HAFN vs. XLK
HAFN (Hafnia Limited) is a stock, while XLK (State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF) is Technology Equities fund tracking the S&P Technology Select Sector Daily Capped 35/20 Index. Over the past year, HAFN returned 65.87% vs 66.93% for XLK. At a 0.11 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
HAFN vs. XLK - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HAFN achieves a 48.52% return, which is significantly higher than XLK's 36.47% return.
HAFN
- 1D
- -0.77%
- 1M
- -14.21%
- YTD
- 48.52%
- 6M
- 36.21%
- 1Y
- 65.87%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
XLK
- 1D
- -1.00%
- 1M
- 21.09%
- YTD
- 36.47%
- 6M
- 35.71%
- 1Y
- 66.93%
- 3Y*
- 33.90%
- 5Y*
- 23.83%
- 10Y*
- 25.84%
HAFN vs. XLK - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
HAFN Hafnia Limited | 48.52% | 2.71% | -12.52% |
XLK State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF | 36.47% | 24.61% | 12.78% |
Correlation
The correlation between HAFN and XLK is -0.00, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.00 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 10, 2024 | 0.11 |
The correlation between HAFN and XLK shifts across timeframes, from -0.00 (1 year) to 0.11 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HAFN vs. XLK — Risk / Return Rank
HAFN
XLK
HAFN vs. XLK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hafnia Limited (HAFN) and State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| HAFN | XLK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.33 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.41 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.31 | 1.52 | -0.21 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.46 | 4.22 | -0.76 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.70 | 14.16 | -5.45 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| HAFN | XLK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.91 | 3.24 | -1.33 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.96 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 1.06 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.38 | 0.42 | -0.04 |
Drawdowns
HAFN vs. XLK - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HAFN drawdown since its inception was -53.75%, smaller than the maximum XLK drawdown of -82.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HAFN and XLK.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HAFN | XLK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -53.75% | -82.05% | +28.30% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -19.13% | -15.92% | -3.21% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -25.66% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -33.56% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -33.56% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -18.29% | -1.00% | -17.29% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -21.20% | -34.96% | +13.76% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.59% | 4.74% | +2.85% |
Volatility
HAFN vs. XLK - Volatility Comparison
Hafnia Limited (HAFN) has a higher volatility of 11.74% compared to State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLK) at 6.98%. This indicates that HAFN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XLK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HAFN | XLK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.74% | 6.98% | +4.76% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 24.56% | 16.68% | +7.88% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 34.77% | 20.82% | +13.95% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 38.18% | 24.90% | +13.28% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 38.18% | 24.49% | +13.69% |
Dividends
HAFN vs. XLK - Dividend Comparison
HAFN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.75%, more than XLK's 0.39% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HAFN Hafnia Limited | 5.75% | 7.48% | 20.25% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
XLK State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF | 0.39% | 0.54% | 0.66% | 0.76% | 1.04% | 0.65% | 0.92% | 1.16% | 1.60% | 1.37% | 1.74% | 1.79% |
Frequently Asked Questions
HAFN and XLK have a correlation of -0.00, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
HAFN has higher volatility (11.74%) compared to XLK (6.98%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HAFN dropped -53.75% vs XLK's -82.05%.
XLK currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.24 vs 1.91), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for HAFN and XLK
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer