PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
H4ZN.DE vs. H4ZL.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

H4ZN.DE vs. H4ZL.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in HSBC S&P 500 UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (H4ZN.DE) and HSBC FTSE EPRA NAREIT Developed UCITS ETF USD (H4ZL.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, H4ZN.DE achieves a 11.87% return, which is significantly lower than H4ZL.DE's 12.75% return.


H4ZN.DE

1D
0.00%
1M
1.20%
YTD
11.87%
6M
12.19%
1Y
25.94%
3Y*
19.28%
5Y*
29.49%
10Y*
13.79%

H4ZL.DE

1D
-0.23%
1M
2.21%
YTD
12.75%
6M
13.94%
1Y
15.88%
3Y*
9.37%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

H4ZN.DE vs. H4ZL.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
H4ZN.DE
HSBC S&P 500 UCITS ETF USD (Acc)
11.87%4.72%32.33%22.56%
H4ZL.DE
HSBC FTSE EPRA NAREIT Developed UCITS ETF USD
12.75%-1.48%5.75%6.44%

Correlation

The correlation between H4ZN.DE and H4ZL.DE is 0.38, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.38

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.48

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 2023

0.51

The correlation between H4ZN.DE and H4ZL.DE shifts across timeframes, from 0.38 (1 year) to 0.51 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

H4ZN.DE vs. H4ZL.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

H4ZN.DE
H4ZN.DE Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
H4ZN.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7878
Sharpe Ratio Rank
H4ZN.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
H4ZN.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
H4ZN.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
H4ZN.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank

H4ZL.DE
H4ZL.DE Risk / Return Rank: 4444
Overall Rank
H4ZL.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4444
Sharpe Ratio Rank
H4ZL.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 4343
Sortino Ratio Rank
H4ZL.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 4141
Omega Ratio Rank
H4ZL.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 4646
Calmar Ratio Rank
H4ZL.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 4747
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

H4ZN.DE vs. H4ZL.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for HSBC S&P 500 UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (H4ZN.DE) and HSBC FTSE EPRA NAREIT Developed UCITS ETF USD (H4ZL.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


H4ZN.DEH4ZL.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.77

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.98

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.40

1.24

+0.16

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.63

2.03

+1.61

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.81

7.07

+5.74

H4ZN.DE vs. H4ZL.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current H4ZN.DE Sharpe Ratio is 2.18, which is higher than the H4ZL.DE Sharpe Ratio of 1.41. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of H4ZN.DE and H4ZL.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

H4ZN.DE vs. H4ZL.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum H4ZN.DE drawdown since its inception was -43.18%, which is greater than H4ZL.DE's maximum drawdown of -20.11%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for H4ZN.DE and H4ZL.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


H4ZN.DEH4ZL.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-43.18%

-20.11%

-23.07%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.17%

-7.84%

+0.67%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.40%

-20.11%

-3.29%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.40%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-23.40%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.23%

+0.23%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-17.50%

-6.58%

-10.92%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.03%

2.25%

-0.22%

Volatility

H4ZN.DE vs. H4ZL.DE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for HSBC S&P 500 UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (H4ZN.DE) is 3.21%, while HSBC FTSE EPRA NAREIT Developed UCITS ETF USD (H4ZL.DE) has a volatility of 3.58%. This indicates that H4ZN.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than H4ZL.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


H4ZN.DEH4ZL.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.21%

3.58%

-0.37%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.98%

8.68%

-0.70%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.96%

11.34%

+0.62%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

47.86%

14.00%

+33.86%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

33.89%

14.00%

+19.89%

H4ZN.DE vs. H4ZL.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

H4ZN.DE has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is lower than H4ZL.DE's 0.24% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

H4ZN.DE vs. H4ZL.DE - Dividend Comparison

H4ZN.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while H4ZL.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.90%.


PositionTTM202520242023
H4ZL.DE
HSBC FTSE EPRA NAREIT Developed UCITS ETF USD
2.90%3.31%3.28%3.42%
H4ZN.DE
HSBC S&P 500 UCITS ETF USD (Acc)
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


H4ZN.DE and H4ZL.DE have a correlation of 0.38, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, H4ZN.DE is cheaper at 0.09% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

H4ZN.DE is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.24% for H4ZL.DE.

H4ZN.DE is categorized as S&P 500, while H4ZL.DE is REIT. H4ZN.DE tracks S&P 500 Index, while H4ZL.DE tracks FTSE EPRA/NAREIT Developed. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for H4ZN.DE and 0.24% for H4ZL.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for H4ZN.DE and H4ZL.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer