H4ZN.DE vs. 2B7B.DE
H4ZN.DE (HSBC S&P 500 UCITS ETF USD (Acc)) and 2B7B.DE (iShares V PLC - iShares S&P 500 Materials Sector UCITS ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - H4ZN.DE is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Index, while 2B7B.DE is a Materials fund tracking the S&P 500 Capped 35/20 Materials Sector Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, H4ZN.DE returned 18.87%/yr vs 8.06%/yr for 2B7B.DE. A 0.61 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. H4ZN.DE charges 0.09%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for 2B7B.DE.
Performance
H4ZN.DE vs. 2B7B.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, H4ZN.DE achieves a 11.38% return, which is significantly lower than 2B7B.DE's 12.98% return.
H4ZN.DE
- 1D
- -0.12%
- 1M
- 4.34%
- YTD
- 11.38%
- 6M
- 10.80%
- 1Y
- 25.53%
- 3Y*
- 18.87%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
2B7B.DE
- 1D
- -0.32%
- 1M
- -0.26%
- YTD
- 12.98%
- 6M
- 16.62%
- 1Y
- 16.36%
- 3Y*
- 8.06%
- 5Y*
- 5.89%
- 10Y*
- —
H4ZN.DE vs. 2B7B.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
H4ZN.DE HSBC S&P 500 UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 11.38% | 4.72% | 32.33% | 22.56% | -5.90% |
2B7B.DE iShares V PLC - iShares S&P 500 Materials Sector UCITS ETF | 12.98% | -1.07% | 5.24% | 8.58% | 0.67% |
Correlation
The correlation between H4ZN.DE and 2B7B.DE is 0.44, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.44 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.54 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 13, 2022 | 0.61 |
The correlation between H4ZN.DE and 2B7B.DE shifts across timeframes, from 0.44 (1 year) to 0.61 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
H4ZN.DE vs. 2B7B.DE — Risk / Return Rank
H4ZN.DE
2B7B.DE
H4ZN.DE vs. 2B7B.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for HSBC S&P 500 UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (H4ZN.DE) and iShares V PLC - iShares S&P 500 Materials Sector UCITS ETF (2B7B.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| H4ZN.DE | 2B7B.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.15 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.43 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.41 | 1.18 | +0.23 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.55 | 1.58 | +1.97 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.69 | 4.68 | +8.01 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| H4ZN.DE | 2B7B.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.20 | 1.04 | +1.15 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.34 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.09 | 0.45 | +0.65 |
Drawdowns
H4ZN.DE vs. 2B7B.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum H4ZN.DE drawdown since its inception was -23.40%, smaller than the maximum 2B7B.DE drawdown of -34.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for H4ZN.DE and 2B7B.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| H4ZN.DE | 2B7B.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -23.40% | -34.61% | +11.21% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.17% | -10.19% | +3.02% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -23.40% | -24.54% | +1.14% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -24.54% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.43% | -2.44% | +2.01% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.50% | -6.21% | +1.71% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.01% | 3.44% | -1.43% |
Volatility
H4ZN.DE vs. 2B7B.DE - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for HSBC S&P 500 UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (H4ZN.DE) is 2.66%, while iShares V PLC - iShares S&P 500 Materials Sector UCITS ETF (2B7B.DE) has a volatility of 4.84%. This indicates that H4ZN.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than 2B7B.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| H4ZN.DE | 2B7B.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.66% | 4.84% | -2.18% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.63% | 12.31% | -4.68% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.60% | 15.43% | -3.83% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.48% | 17.20% | -2.72% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.48% | 19.16% | -4.68% |
H4ZN.DE vs. 2B7B.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
H4ZN.DE has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is lower than 2B7B.DE's 0.15% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
H4ZN.DE vs. 2B7B.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither H4ZN.DE nor 2B7B.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
H4ZN.DE and 2B7B.DE have a correlation of 0.44, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, H4ZN.DE is cheaper at 0.09% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
H4ZN.DE is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for 2B7B.DE.
H4ZN.DE is categorized as S&P 500, while 2B7B.DE is Materials. H4ZN.DE tracks S&P 500 Index, while 2B7B.DE tracks S&P 500 Capped 35/20 Materials Sector Index. They also come from different issuers: HSBC and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for H4ZN.DE and 0.15% for 2B7B.DE.
Find the right allocation for H4ZN.DE and 2B7B.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer