H4ZN.DE vs. H4Z7.DE

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

H4ZN.DE (HSBC S&P 500 UCITS ETF USD (Acc)) and H4Z7.DE (HSBC FTSE EPRA NAREIT Developed UCITS ETF USD (Acc)) are both exchange-traded funds - H4ZN.DE is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Index, while H4Z7.DE is a REIT fund tracking the FTSE EPRA/NAREIT Developed. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, H4ZN.DE returned 18.87%/yr vs 6.21%/yr for H4Z7.DE. A 0.55 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. H4ZN.DE charges 0.09%/yr vs 0.24%/yr for H4Z7.DE.

Performance

H4ZN.DE vs. H4Z7.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in HSBC S&P 500 UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (H4ZN.DE) and HSBC FTSE EPRA NAREIT Developed UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (H4Z7.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, H4ZN.DE achieves a 11.38% return, which is significantly higher than H4Z7.DE's 7.83% return.

H4ZN.DE

• 1D: -0.12%
• 1M: 4.34%
• YTD: 11.38%
• 6M: 10.80%
• 1Y: 25.53%
• 3Y*: 18.87%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

H4Z7.DE

• 1D: -0.12%
• 1M: -2.61%
• YTD: 7.83%
• 6M: 7.26%
• 1Y: 9.73%
• 3Y*: 6.21%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

H4ZN.DE vs. H4Z7.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
H4ZN.DE HSBC S&P 500 UCITS ETF USD (Acc)	11.38%	4.72%	32.33%	22.56%	-7.18%
H4Z7.DE HSBC FTSE EPRA NAREIT Developed UCITS ETF USD (Acc)	7.83%	-1.78%	5.80%	7.39%	-13.07%

Correlation

The correlation between H4ZN.DE and H4Z7.DE is 0.43, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.43
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.49
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 26, 2022	0.55

The correlation between H4ZN.DE and H4Z7.DE shifts across timeframes, from 0.43 (1 year) to 0.55 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

H4ZN.DE vs. H4Z7.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

H4ZN.DE

H4ZN.DE Risk / Return Rank: 69
H4ZN.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 68
H4ZN.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
H4ZN.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 70
H4ZN.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 72
H4ZN.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 69

H4Z7.DE

H4Z7.DE Risk / Return Rank: 25
H4Z7.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 25
H4Z7.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 24
H4Z7.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 24
H4Z7.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 26
H4Z7.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 28

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

H4ZN.DE vs. H4Z7.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for HSBC S&P 500 UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (H4ZN.DE) and HSBC FTSE EPRA NAREIT Developed UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (H4Z7.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	H4ZN.DE	H4Z7.DE	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.20	0.86	+1.34
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.97	1.26	+1.71
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.41	1.15	+0.26
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.55	1.23	+2.32
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	12.69	3.99	+8.70
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

H4ZN.DE vs. H4Z7.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current H4ZN.DE Sharpe Ratio is 2.20, which is higher than the H4Z7.DE Sharpe Ratio of 0.86. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of H4ZN.DE and H4Z7.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	H4ZN.DE	H4Z7.DE	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.20	0.86	+1.34
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.09	0.08	+1.01

Drawdowns

H4ZN.DE vs. H4Z7.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum H4ZN.DE drawdown since its inception was -23.40%, smaller than the maximum H4Z7.DE drawdown of -26.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for H4ZN.DE and H4Z7.DE.

Drawdown Indicators

	H4ZN.DE	H4Z7.DE	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-23.40%	-26.78%	+3.38%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.17%	-7.86%	+0.69%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-23.40%	-20.13%	-3.27%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.43%	-2.86%	+2.43%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.50%	-11.53%	+7.03%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.01%	2.42%	-0.41%

Volatility

H4ZN.DE vs. H4Z7.DE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for HSBC S&P 500 UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (H4ZN.DE) is 2.66%, while HSBC FTSE EPRA NAREIT Developed UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (H4Z7.DE) has a volatility of 2.87%. This indicates that H4ZN.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than H4Z7.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	H4ZN.DE	H4Z7.DE	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.66%	2.87%	-0.21%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	7.63%	8.56%	-0.93%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	11.60%	11.25%	+0.35%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	14.48%	14.42%	+0.06%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	14.48%	14.42%	+0.06%

H4ZN.DE vs. H4Z7.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

H4ZN.DE has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is lower than H4Z7.DE's 0.24% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

H4ZN.DE vs. H4Z7.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither H4ZN.DE nor H4Z7.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both H4ZN.DE and H4Z7.DE in my portfolio?

H4ZN.DE and H4Z7.DE have a correlation of 0.43, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, H4ZN.DE or H4Z7.DE?

On fees, H4ZN.DE is cheaper at 0.09% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, H4ZN.DE or H4Z7.DE?

H4ZN.DE is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.24% for H4Z7.DE.

What is the main difference between H4ZN.DE and H4Z7.DE?

H4ZN.DE is categorized as S&P 500, while H4Z7.DE is REIT. H4ZN.DE tracks S&P 500 Index, while H4Z7.DE tracks FTSE EPRA/NAREIT Developed. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for H4ZN.DE and 0.24% for H4Z7.DE.