H4ZN.DE vs. H4ZF.DE
H4ZN.DE (HSBC S&P 500 UCITS ETF USD (Acc)) and H4ZF.DE (HSBC S&P 500 UCITS ETF USD) are both S&P 500 funds from HSBC tracking the S&P 500 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, H4ZN.DE returned 18.87%/yr vs 18.88%/yr for H4ZF.DE. With a 1.00 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. Both charge a 0.09% expense ratio.
Performance
H4ZN.DE vs. H4ZF.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with H4ZN.DE having a 11.38% return and H4ZF.DE slightly lower at 11.35%.
H4ZN.DE
- 1D
- -0.12%
- 1M
- 4.34%
- YTD
- 11.38%
- 6M
- 10.80%
- 1Y
- 25.53%
- 3Y*
- 18.87%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
H4ZF.DE
- 1D
- -0.12%
- 1M
- 4.35%
- YTD
- 11.35%
- 6M
- 10.84%
- 1Y
- 25.55%
- 3Y*
- 18.88%
- 5Y*
- 14.74%
- 10Y*
- 15.80%
H4ZN.DE vs. H4ZF.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
H4ZN.DE HSBC S&P 500 UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 11.38% | 4.72% | 32.33% | 22.56% | -5.90% |
H4ZF.DE HSBC S&P 500 UCITS ETF USD | 11.35% | 4.74% | 32.24% | 22.66% | -5.88% |
Correlation
The correlation between H4ZN.DE and H4ZF.DE is 0.99 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.00 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 1.00 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 13, 2022 | 1.00 |
The correlation between H4ZN.DE and H4ZF.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.99 to 1.00 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
H4ZN.DE vs. H4ZF.DE — Risk / Return Rank
H4ZN.DE
H4ZF.DE
H4ZN.DE vs. H4ZF.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for HSBC S&P 500 UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (H4ZN.DE) and HSBC S&P 500 UCITS ETF USD (H4ZF.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| H4ZN.DE | H4ZF.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.00 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.01 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.41 | 1.41 | 0.00 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.55 | 3.56 | -0.01 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.69 | 12.69 | +0.01 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| H4ZN.DE | H4ZF.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.20 | 2.20 | 0.00 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.96 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.97 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.09 | 1.03 | +0.06 |
Drawdowns
H4ZN.DE vs. H4ZF.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum H4ZN.DE drawdown since its inception was -23.40%, smaller than the maximum H4ZF.DE drawdown of -33.82%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for H4ZN.DE and H4ZF.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| H4ZN.DE | H4ZF.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -23.40% | -33.82% | +10.42% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.17% | -7.16% | -0.01% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -23.40% | -23.32% | -0.08% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -23.32% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -33.82% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.43% | -0.44% | +0.01% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.50% | -3.93% | -0.57% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.01% | 2.01% | 0.00% |
Volatility
H4ZN.DE vs. H4ZF.DE - Volatility Comparison
HSBC S&P 500 UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (H4ZN.DE) and HSBC S&P 500 UCITS ETF USD (H4ZF.DE) have volatilities of 2.66% and 2.68%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| H4ZN.DE | H4ZF.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.66% | 2.68% | -0.02% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.63% | 7.59% | +0.04% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.60% | 11.61% | -0.01% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.48% | 15.20% | -0.72% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.48% | 16.12% | -1.64% |
H4ZN.DE vs. H4ZF.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both H4ZN.DE and H4ZF.DE have an expense ratio of 0.09%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
H4ZN.DE vs. H4ZF.DE - Dividend Comparison
H4ZN.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while H4ZF.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.82%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
H4ZF.DE HSBC S&P 500 UCITS ETF USD | 0.82% | 0.95% | 0.96% | 1.19% | 1.32% | 0.91% | 2.24% | 2.98% | 3.49% | 3.23% | 3.29% | 4.21% |
H4ZN.DE HSBC S&P 500 UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.99, H4ZN.DE and H4ZF.DE move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
Both ETFs have the same 0.09% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
H4ZN.DE and H4ZF.DE have the same expense ratio: 0.09% per year.
Both ETFs track S&P 500 Index.
Find the right allocation for H4ZN.DE and H4ZF.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer