PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
H4ZF.DE vs. H4ZA.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

H4ZF.DE vs. H4ZA.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in HSBC S&P 500 UCITS ETF USD (H4ZF.DE) and HSBC EURO STOXX 50 UCITS ETF EUR (H4ZA.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

H4ZF.DE vs. H4ZA.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
H4ZF.DE
HSBC S&P 500 UCITS ETF USD
-3.07%4.74%32.24%22.66%-14.40%40.68%7.94%36.99%0.78%8.65%
H4ZA.DE
HSBC EURO STOXX 50 UCITS ETF EUR
-0.82%22.26%13.81%22.59%-8.87%23.72%-2.73%30.07%-11.96%10.07%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, H4ZF.DE achieves a -3.07% return, which is significantly lower than H4ZA.DE's -0.82% return. Over the past 10 years, H4ZF.DE has outperformed H4ZA.DE with an annualized return of 14.49%, while H4ZA.DE has yielded a comparatively lower 10.38% annualized return.


H4ZF.DE

1D
1.72%
1M
-3.11%
YTD
-3.07%
6M
0.01%
1Y
10.11%
3Y*
16.08%
5Y*
12.06%
10Y*
14.49%

H4ZA.DE

1D
3.00%
1M
-4.13%
YTD
-0.82%
6M
3.26%
1Y
10.92%
3Y*
14.08%
5Y*
11.42%
10Y*
10.38%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


H4ZF.DE vs. H4ZA.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

H4ZF.DE has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is higher than H4ZA.DE's 0.05% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Return for Risk

H4ZF.DE vs. H4ZA.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

H4ZF.DE
H4ZF.DE Risk / Return Rank: 3434
Overall Rank
H4ZF.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2929
Sharpe Ratio Rank
H4ZF.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 2929
Sortino Ratio Rank
H4ZF.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 3030
Omega Ratio Rank
H4ZF.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 4242
Calmar Ratio Rank
H4ZF.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 4242
Martin Ratio Rank

H4ZA.DE
H4ZA.DE Risk / Return Rank: 3232
Overall Rank
H4ZA.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3131
Sharpe Ratio Rank
H4ZA.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 3030
Sortino Ratio Rank
H4ZA.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 2929
Omega Ratio Rank
H4ZA.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 3636
Calmar Ratio Rank
H4ZA.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 3636
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

H4ZF.DE vs. H4ZA.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for HSBC S&P 500 UCITS ETF USD (H4ZF.DE) and HSBC EURO STOXX 50 UCITS ETF EUR (H4ZA.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


H4ZF.DEH4ZA.DEDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.59

0.63

-0.04

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.89

0.94

-0.05

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.13

1.13

0.00

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.20

1.02

+0.18

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

4.34

3.57

+0.77

H4ZF.DE vs. H4ZA.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current H4ZF.DE Sharpe Ratio is 0.59, which is comparable to the H4ZA.DE Sharpe Ratio of 0.63. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of H4ZF.DE and H4ZA.DE, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


H4ZF.DEH4ZA.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.59

0.63

-0.04

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.78

0.66

+0.13

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.89

0.57

+0.32

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.97

0.39

+0.58

Correlation

The correlation between H4ZF.DE and H4ZA.DE is 0.65, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

H4ZF.DE vs. H4ZA.DE - Dividend Comparison

H4ZF.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.94%, less than H4ZA.DE's 2.64% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
H4ZF.DE
HSBC S&P 500 UCITS ETF USD
0.94%0.95%0.96%1.19%1.32%0.91%2.24%2.98%3.49%3.23%3.29%4.21%
H4ZA.DE
HSBC EURO STOXX 50 UCITS ETF EUR
2.64%2.49%5.35%2.93%2.94%1.94%2.06%2.84%3.55%2.73%2.85%2.70%

Drawdowns

H4ZF.DE vs. H4ZA.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum H4ZF.DE drawdown since its inception was -33.82%, smaller than the maximum H4ZA.DE drawdown of -38.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for H4ZF.DE and H4ZA.DE.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


H4ZF.DEH4ZA.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.82%

-38.41%

+4.59%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.42%

-12.68%

-0.74%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.32%

-23.26%

-0.06%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.82%

-38.41%

+4.59%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.24%

-7.04%

+1.80%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.96%

-7.90%

+3.94%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.33%

3.14%

-0.81%

Volatility

H4ZF.DE vs. H4ZA.DE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for HSBC S&P 500 UCITS ETF USD (H4ZF.DE) is 3.80%, while HSBC EURO STOXX 50 UCITS ETF EUR (H4ZA.DE) has a volatility of 6.57%. This indicates that H4ZF.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than H4ZA.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


H4ZF.DEH4ZA.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.80%

6.57%

-2.77%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.65%

11.03%

-2.38%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.20%

17.41%

-0.21%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.23%

17.24%

-2.01%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.17%

18.11%

-1.94%