2B7B.DE vs. XZEU.DE
Compare and contrast key facts about iShares S&P 500 Materials Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (2B7B.DE) and Xtrackers MSCI Europe ESG UCITS ETF 1C (XZEU.DE).
2B7B.DE and XZEU.DE are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. 2B7B.DE is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the S&P 500 Capped 35/20 Materials. It was launched on Mar 20, 2017. XZEU.DE is a passively managed fund by Xtrackers that tracks the performance of the MSCI Europe NR EUR. It was launched on Jun 27, 2018. Both 2B7B.DE and XZEU.DE are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: 2B7B.DE or XZEU.DE.
Correlation
The correlation between 2B7B.DE and XZEU.DE is 0.64, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Performance
2B7B.DE vs. XZEU.DE - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
2B7B.DE:
0.56
XZEU.DE:
1.02
2B7B.DE:
0.85
XZEU.DE:
1.45
2B7B.DE:
1.11
XZEU.DE:
1.18
2B7B.DE:
0.76
XZEU.DE:
1.69
2B7B.DE:
2.38
XZEU.DE:
5.85
2B7B.DE:
2.95%
XZEU.DE:
1.89%
2B7B.DE:
12.56%
XZEU.DE:
10.79%
2B7B.DE:
-34.61%
XZEU.DE:
-33.18%
2B7B.DE:
-8.88%
XZEU.DE:
-5.15%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, 2B7B.DE achieves a 6.85% return, which is significantly lower than XZEU.DE's 10.84% return.
2B7B.DE
6.85%
-5.38%
-0.93%
7.30%
10.03%
N/A
XZEU.DE
10.84%
-0.95%
-1.85%
11.32%
7.06%
N/A
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
2B7B.DE vs. XZEU.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
2B7B.DE has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than XZEU.DE's 0.20% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
2B7B.DE vs. XZEU.DE - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares S&P 500 Materials Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (2B7B.DE) and Xtrackers MSCI Europe ESG UCITS ETF 1C (XZEU.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
2B7B.DE vs. XZEU.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither 2B7B.DE nor XZEU.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Drawdowns
2B7B.DE vs. XZEU.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum 2B7B.DE drawdown since its inception was -34.61%, roughly equal to the maximum XZEU.DE drawdown of -33.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for 2B7B.DE and XZEU.DE. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
2B7B.DE vs. XZEU.DE - Volatility Comparison
iShares S&P 500 Materials Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (2B7B.DE) has a higher volatility of 3.86% compared to Xtrackers MSCI Europe ESG UCITS ETF 1C (XZEU.DE) at 3.29%. This indicates that 2B7B.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XZEU.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.