H4ZF.DE vs. DBPG.DE
H4ZF.DE (HSBC S&P 500 UCITS ETF USD) and DBPG.DE (Xtrackers S&P 500 2x Leveraged Daily Swap UCITS ETF 1C) are both exchange-traded funds - H4ZF.DE is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Index, while DBPG.DE is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the S&P 500 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, H4ZF.DE returned 15.80%/yr vs 24.01%/yr for DBPG.DE. Their correlation of 0.92 suggests significant overlap in exposure. H4ZF.DE charges 0.09%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for DBPG.DE.
Performance
H4ZF.DE vs. DBPG.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, H4ZF.DE achieves a 11.35% return, which is significantly lower than DBPG.DE's 19.52% return. Over the past 10 years, H4ZF.DE has underperformed DBPG.DE with an annualized return of 15.80%, while DBPG.DE has yielded a comparatively higher 24.01% annualized return.
H4ZF.DE
- 1D
- -0.12%
- 1M
- 5.21%
- YTD
- 11.35%
- 6M
- 11.39%
- 1Y
- 25.60%
- 3Y*
- 18.88%
- 5Y*
- 14.74%
- 10Y*
- 15.80%
DBPG.DE
- 1D
- -0.23%
- 1M
- 9.51%
- YTD
- 19.52%
- 6M
- 20.06%
- 1Y
- 51.09%
- 3Y*
- 34.60%
- 5Y*
- 21.51%
- 10Y*
- 24.01%
H4ZF.DE vs. DBPG.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
H4ZF.DE HSBC S&P 500 UCITS ETF USD | 11.35% | 4.74% | 32.24% | 22.66% | -14.40% | 40.68% | 7.94% | 36.99% | 0.78% | 8.65% |
DBPG.DE Xtrackers S&P 500 2x Leveraged Daily Swap UCITS ETF 1C | 19.52% | 13.51% | 53.27% | 44.01% | -36.28% | 78.38% | 9.47% | 68.71% | -12.05% | 25.82% |
Correlation
The correlation between H4ZF.DE and DBPG.DE is 0.95 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.95 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.95 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.96 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.96 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 14, 2010 | 0.92 |
The correlation between H4ZF.DE and DBPG.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.92 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
H4ZF.DE vs. DBPG.DE — Risk / Return Rank
H4ZF.DE
DBPG.DE
H4ZF.DE vs. DBPG.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for HSBC S&P 500 UCITS ETF USD (H4ZF.DE) and Xtrackers S&P 500 2x Leveraged Daily Swap UCITS ETF 1C (DBPG.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| H4ZF.DE | DBPG.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.07 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.01 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.41 | 1.39 | +0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.56 | 3.30 | +0.27 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.69 | 12.66 | +0.03 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| H4ZF.DE | DBPG.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.20 | 2.26 | -0.07 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.96 | 0.71 | +0.25 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.97 | 0.76 | +0.22 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.03 | 0.78 | +0.25 |
Drawdowns
H4ZF.DE vs. DBPG.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum H4ZF.DE drawdown since its inception was -33.82%, smaller than the maximum DBPG.DE drawdown of -59.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for H4ZF.DE and DBPG.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| H4ZF.DE | DBPG.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -33.82% | -59.28% | +25.46% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.16% | -15.43% | +8.27% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -23.32% | -38.46% | +15.14% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -23.32% | -38.46% | +15.14% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -33.82% | -59.28% | +25.46% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.44% | -1.10% | +0.66% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.93% | -8.85% | +4.92% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.01% | 4.02% | -2.01% |
Volatility
H4ZF.DE vs. DBPG.DE - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for HSBC S&P 500 UCITS ETF USD (H4ZF.DE) is 2.68%, while Xtrackers S&P 500 2x Leveraged Daily Swap UCITS ETF 1C (DBPG.DE) has a volatility of 5.65%. This indicates that H4ZF.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DBPG.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| H4ZF.DE | DBPG.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.68% | 5.65% | -2.97% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.59% | 15.61% | -8.02% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.61% | 22.46% | -10.85% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.20% | 30.11% | -14.91% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.12% | 31.48% | -15.36% |
H4ZF.DE vs. DBPG.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
H4ZF.DE has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is lower than DBPG.DE's 0.60% expense ratio.
Dividends
H4ZF.DE vs. DBPG.DE - Dividend Comparison
H4ZF.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.82%, while DBPG.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DBPG.DE Xtrackers S&P 500 2x Leveraged Daily Swap UCITS ETF 1C | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
H4ZF.DE HSBC S&P 500 UCITS ETF USD | 0.82% | 0.95% | 0.96% | 1.19% | 1.32% | 0.91% | 2.24% | 2.98% | 3.49% | 3.23% | 3.29% | 4.21% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.95, H4ZF.DE and DBPG.DE move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, H4ZF.DE is cheaper at 0.09% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
H4ZF.DE is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for DBPG.DE.
H4ZF.DE is categorized as S&P 500, while DBPG.DE is Leveraged Equities. Both ETFs track S&P 500 Index. They also come from different issuers: HSBC and Xtrackers. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for H4ZF.DE and 0.60% for DBPG.DE.
Find the right allocation for H4ZF.DE and DBPG.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer