DBPG.DE vs. LYMZ.DE
Compare and contrast key facts about Xtrackers S&P 500 2x Leveraged Daily Swap UCITS ETF 1C (DBPG.DE) and Amundi EURO STOXX 50 Daily (2x) Leveraged UCITS ETF (LYMZ.DE).
DBPG.DE and LYMZ.DE are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. DBPG.DE is a passively managed fund by Xtrackers that tracks the performance of the S&P 500 Index. It was launched on Mar 18, 2010. LYMZ.DE is a passively managed fund by Amundi that tracks the performance of the EURO STOXX 50 Daily Leverage Index. It was launched on Jun 29, 2007. Both DBPG.DE and LYMZ.DE are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
DBPG.DE vs. LYMZ.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
DBPG.DE vs. LYMZ.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DBPG.DE Xtrackers S&P 500 2x Leveraged Daily Swap UCITS ETF 1C | -8.60% | 13.51% | 53.27% | 44.01% | -36.28% | 78.38% | 9.47% | 68.71% | -12.05% | 25.82% |
LYMZ.DE Amundi EURO STOXX 50 Daily (2x) Leveraged UCITS ETF | -3.18% | 39.84% | 15.21% | 41.48% | -21.87% | 49.32% | -15.91% | 64.99% | -24.78% | 18.73% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DBPG.DE achieves a -8.60% return, which is significantly lower than LYMZ.DE's -3.18% return. Over the past 10 years, DBPG.DE has outperformed LYMZ.DE with an annualized return of 21.28%, while LYMZ.DE has yielded a comparatively lower 14.93% annualized return.
DBPG.DE
- 1D
- 4.05%
- 1M
- -7.31%
- YTD
- -8.60%
- 6M
- -4.02%
- 1Y
- 20.36%
- 3Y*
- 27.52%
- 5Y*
- 16.83%
- 10Y*
- 21.28%
LYMZ.DE
- 1D
- 5.93%
- 1M
- -8.77%
- YTD
- -3.18%
- 6M
- 3.75%
- 1Y
- 15.29%
- 3Y*
- 20.06%
- 5Y*
- 16.04%
- 10Y*
- 14.93%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
DBPG.DE vs. LYMZ.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
DBPG.DE has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than LYMZ.DE's 0.40% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
DBPG.DE vs. LYMZ.DE — Risk / Return Rank
DBPG.DE
LYMZ.DE
DBPG.DE vs. LYMZ.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers S&P 500 2x Leveraged Daily Swap UCITS ETF 1C (DBPG.DE) and Amundi EURO STOXX 50 Daily (2x) Leveraged UCITS ETF (LYMZ.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| DBPG.DE | LYMZ.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.52 | 0.44 | +0.08 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.01 | 0.81 | +0.20 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.15 | 1.11 | +0.04 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.83 | 0.75 | +0.07 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.97 | 2.52 | -0.55 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| DBPG.DE | LYMZ.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.52 | 0.44 | +0.08 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.53 | 0.46 | +0.07 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.65 | 0.41 | +0.25 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.71 | 0.08 | +0.63 |
Correlation
The correlation between DBPG.DE and LYMZ.DE is 0.72, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
DBPG.DE vs. LYMZ.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither DBPG.DE nor LYMZ.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Drawdowns
DBPG.DE vs. LYMZ.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DBPG.DE drawdown since its inception was -59.28%, smaller than the maximum LYMZ.DE drawdown of -84.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DBPG.DE and LYMZ.DE.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| DBPG.DE | LYMZ.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -59.28% | -84.31% | +25.03% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -24.02% | -24.56% | +0.54% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -38.46% | -44.28% | +5.82% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -59.28% | -63.87% | +4.59% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -20.29% | -14.34% | -5.95% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.21% | -40.46% | +31.25% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 10.01% | 6.32% | +3.69% |
Volatility
DBPG.DE vs. LYMZ.DE - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Xtrackers S&P 500 2x Leveraged Daily Swap UCITS ETF 1C (DBPG.DE) is 8.38%, while Amundi EURO STOXX 50 Daily (2x) Leveraged UCITS ETF (LYMZ.DE) has a volatility of 13.04%. This indicates that DBPG.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LYMZ.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| DBPG.DE | LYMZ.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.38% | 13.04% | -4.66% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 27.26% | 21.93% | +5.33% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 38.85% | 34.81% | +4.04% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 31.68% | 34.49% | -2.81% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 32.25% | 36.21% | -3.96% |