PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
H4ZA.DE vs. H4ZX.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

H4ZA.DE vs. H4ZX.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in HSBC EURO STOXX 50 UCITS ETF EUR (H4ZA.DE) and HSBC Hang Seng TECH UCITS ETF HKD (H4ZX.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, H4ZA.DE achieves a 7.24% return, which is significantly higher than H4ZX.DE's -10.21% return.


H4ZA.DE

1D
0.77%
1M
1.94%
YTD
7.24%
6M
8.59%
1Y
15.63%
3Y*
16.60%
5Y*
12.12%
10Y*
10.80%

H4ZX.DE

1D
-0.76%
1M
-0.37%
YTD
-10.21%
6M
-12.22%
1Y
-7.89%
3Y*
6.77%
5Y*
-8.49%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

H4ZA.DE vs. H4ZX.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
H4ZA.DE
HSBC EURO STOXX 50 UCITS ETF EUR
7.24%22.26%13.81%22.59%-8.87%23.72%1.42%
H4ZX.DE
HSBC Hang Seng TECH UCITS ETF HKD
-10.21%10.69%28.06%-11.53%-20.44%-29.60%2.10%

Correlation

The correlation between H4ZA.DE and H4ZX.DE is 0.36, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.36

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.35

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.38

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 16, 2020

0.37

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

H4ZA.DE vs. H4ZX.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

H4ZA.DE
H4ZA.DE Risk / Return Rank: 2929
Overall Rank
H4ZA.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2828
Sharpe Ratio Rank
H4ZA.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 2929
Sortino Ratio Rank
H4ZA.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 2828
Omega Ratio Rank
H4ZA.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 3030
Calmar Ratio Rank
H4ZA.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 3333
Martin Ratio Rank

H4ZX.DE
H4ZX.DE Risk / Return Rank: 77
Overall Rank
H4ZX.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 77
Sharpe Ratio Rank
H4ZX.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 77
Sortino Ratio Rank
H4ZX.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 77
Omega Ratio Rank
H4ZX.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 77
Calmar Ratio Rank
H4ZX.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 77
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

H4ZA.DE vs. H4ZX.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for HSBC EURO STOXX 50 UCITS ETF EUR (H4ZA.DE) and HSBC Hang Seng TECH UCITS ETF HKD (H4ZX.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


H4ZA.DEH4ZX.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.24

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.73

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.18

0.98

+0.21

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.43

-0.22

+1.65

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.85

-0.41

+5.25

H4ZA.DE vs. H4ZX.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current H4ZA.DE Sharpe Ratio is 0.98, which is higher than the H4ZX.DE Sharpe Ratio of -0.26. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of H4ZA.DE and H4ZX.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


H4ZA.DEH4ZX.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.98

-0.26

+1.24

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.69

-0.22

+0.91

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.59

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.41

-0.20

+0.61

Drawdowns

H4ZA.DE vs. H4ZX.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum H4ZA.DE drawdown since its inception was -38.41%, smaller than the maximum H4ZX.DE drawdown of -69.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for H4ZA.DE and H4ZX.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


H4ZA.DEH4ZX.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-38.41%

-69.32%

+30.91%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.97%

-30.08%

+19.11%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.40%

-33.31%

+16.91%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.26%

-60.34%

+37.08%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-38.41%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.50%

-52.22%

+51.72%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.84%

-49.50%

+41.66%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.24%

16.57%

-13.33%

Volatility

H4ZA.DE vs. H4ZX.DE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for HSBC EURO STOXX 50 UCITS ETF EUR (H4ZA.DE) is 4.95%, while HSBC Hang Seng TECH UCITS ETF HKD (H4ZX.DE) has a volatility of 10.02%. This indicates that H4ZA.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than H4ZX.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


H4ZA.DEH4ZX.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.95%

10.02%

-5.07%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.99%

18.64%

-5.65%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.99%

26.17%

-10.18%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.50%

37.84%

-20.34%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.17%

37.65%

-19.48%

H4ZA.DE vs. H4ZX.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

H4ZA.DE has a 0.05% expense ratio, which is lower than H4ZX.DE's 0.50% expense ratio.


Dividends

H4ZA.DE vs. H4ZX.DE - Dividend Comparison

H4ZA.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.44%, while H4ZX.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
H4ZA.DE
HSBC EURO STOXX 50 UCITS ETF EUR
2.44%2.49%5.35%2.93%2.94%1.94%2.06%2.84%3.55%2.73%2.85%2.70%
H4ZX.DE
HSBC Hang Seng TECH UCITS ETF HKD
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


H4ZA.DE and H4ZX.DE have a correlation of 0.36, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, H4ZA.DE is cheaper at 0.05% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

H4ZA.DE is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for H4ZX.DE.

H4ZA.DE is categorized as Europe Equities, while H4ZX.DE is Technology Equities. H4ZA.DE tracks EURO STOXX® 50, while H4ZX.DE tracks Hang Seng TECH. Their fees differ too: 0.05% for H4ZA.DE and 0.50% for H4ZX.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for H4ZA.DE and H4ZX.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer