PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
H4ZA.DE vs. H4ZJ.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

H4ZA.DE vs. H4ZJ.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in HSBC EURO STOXX 50 UCITS ETF EUR (H4ZA.DE) and HSBC MSCI World UCITS ETF USD (H4ZJ.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, H4ZA.DE achieves a 7.24% return, which is significantly lower than H4ZJ.DE's 10.86% return. Over the past 10 years, H4ZA.DE has underperformed H4ZJ.DE with an annualized return of 10.80%, while H4ZJ.DE has yielded a comparatively higher 14.71% annualized return.


H4ZA.DE

1D
0.77%
1M
1.94%
YTD
7.24%
6M
8.59%
1Y
15.63%
3Y*
16.60%
5Y*
12.12%
10Y*
10.80%

H4ZJ.DE

1D
-0.34%
1M
3.69%
YTD
10.86%
6M
10.96%
1Y
23.81%
3Y*
18.46%
5Y*
13.87%
10Y*
14.71%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

H4ZA.DE vs. H4ZJ.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
H4ZA.DE
HSBC EURO STOXX 50 UCITS ETF EUR
7.24%22.26%13.81%22.59%-8.87%23.72%-2.73%30.07%-11.96%10.07%
H4ZJ.DE
HSBC MSCI World UCITS ETF USD
10.86%8.00%26.94%22.28%-13.11%35.34%7.78%34.57%-2.46%9.87%

Correlation

The correlation between H4ZA.DE and H4ZJ.DE is 0.76, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.76

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.69

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.75

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.78

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 30, 2013

0.76

The correlation between H4ZA.DE and H4ZJ.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.69 to 0.78 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

H4ZA.DE vs. H4ZJ.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

H4ZA.DE
H4ZA.DE Risk / Return Rank: 2929
Overall Rank
H4ZA.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2828
Sharpe Ratio Rank
H4ZA.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 2929
Sortino Ratio Rank
H4ZA.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 2828
Omega Ratio Rank
H4ZA.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 3030
Calmar Ratio Rank
H4ZA.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 3333
Martin Ratio Rank

H4ZJ.DE
H4ZJ.DE Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
H4ZJ.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6565
Sharpe Ratio Rank
H4ZJ.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
H4ZJ.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
H4ZJ.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
H4ZJ.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

H4ZA.DE vs. H4ZJ.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for HSBC EURO STOXX 50 UCITS ETF EUR (H4ZA.DE) and HSBC MSCI World UCITS ETF USD (H4ZJ.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


H4ZA.DEH4ZJ.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.15

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.42

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.18

1.40

-0.22

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.43

3.61

-2.18

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.85

14.41

-9.56

H4ZA.DE vs. H4ZJ.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current H4ZA.DE Sharpe Ratio is 0.98, which is lower than the H4ZJ.DE Sharpe Ratio of 2.13. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of H4ZA.DE and H4ZJ.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


H4ZA.DEH4ZJ.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.98

2.13

-1.15

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.69

0.97

-0.28

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.59

0.97

-0.38

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.41

0.93

-0.52

Drawdowns

H4ZA.DE vs. H4ZJ.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum H4ZA.DE drawdown since its inception was -38.41%, which is greater than H4ZJ.DE's maximum drawdown of -33.60%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for H4ZA.DE and H4ZJ.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


H4ZA.DEH4ZJ.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-38.41%

-33.60%

-4.81%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.97%

-6.59%

-4.38%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.40%

-21.65%

+5.25%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.26%

-21.65%

-1.61%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-38.41%

-33.60%

-4.81%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.50%

-0.34%

-0.16%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.84%

-4.02%

-3.82%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.24%

1.66%

+1.58%

Volatility

H4ZA.DE vs. H4ZJ.DE - Volatility Comparison

HSBC EURO STOXX 50 UCITS ETF EUR (H4ZA.DE) has a higher volatility of 4.95% compared to HSBC MSCI World UCITS ETF USD (H4ZJ.DE) at 2.77%. This indicates that H4ZA.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than H4ZJ.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


H4ZA.DEH4ZJ.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.95%

2.77%

+2.18%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.99%

7.73%

+5.26%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.99%

11.24%

+4.75%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.50%

14.14%

+3.36%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.17%

15.05%

+3.12%

H4ZA.DE vs. H4ZJ.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

H4ZA.DE has a 0.05% expense ratio, which is lower than H4ZJ.DE's 0.15% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

H4ZA.DE vs. H4ZJ.DE - Dividend Comparison

H4ZA.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.44%, more than H4ZJ.DE's 1.16% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
H4ZA.DE
HSBC EURO STOXX 50 UCITS ETF EUR
2.44%2.49%5.35%2.93%2.94%1.94%2.06%2.84%3.55%2.73%2.85%2.70%
H4ZJ.DE
HSBC MSCI World UCITS ETF USD
1.16%1.28%2.06%3.02%2.65%2.73%3.30%4.02%4.71%3.58%4.02%3.46%

Frequently Asked Questions


H4ZA.DE and H4ZJ.DE have a correlation of 0.76, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, H4ZA.DE is cheaper at 0.05% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

H4ZA.DE is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for H4ZJ.DE.

H4ZA.DE is categorized as Europe Equities, while H4ZJ.DE is Global Equities. H4ZA.DE tracks EURO STOXX® 50, while H4ZJ.DE tracks MSCI World. Their fees differ too: 0.05% for H4ZA.DE and 0.15% for H4ZJ.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for H4ZA.DE and H4ZJ.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer