H4ZJ.DE vs. SPYM.DE
Compare and contrast key facts about HSBC MSCI World UCITS ETF USD (H4ZJ.DE) and SPDR MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF (SPYM.DE).
H4ZJ.DE and SPYM.DE are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. H4ZJ.DE is a passively managed fund by HSBC that tracks the performance of the MSCI World. It was launched on Dec 8, 2010. SPYM.DE is a passively managed fund by State Street that tracks the performance of the MSCI Emerging Markets. It was launched on May 13, 2011. Both H4ZJ.DE and SPYM.DE are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: H4ZJ.DE or SPYM.DE.
Key characteristics
| H4ZJ.DE | SPYM.DE | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | 15.19% | 8.47% |
| 1Y Return | 20.17% | 10.17% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | 9.25% | -0.73% |
| 5Y Return (Ann) | 12.31% | 3.62% |
| 10Y Return (Ann) | 11.43% | 4.56% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 2.05 | 0.96 |
| Daily Std Dev | 10.98% | 13.20% |
| Max Drawdown | -33.60% | -36.28% |
| Current Drawdown | -1.93% | -10.32% |
Correlation
The correlation between H4ZJ.DE and SPYM.DE is 0.65, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Performance
H4ZJ.DE vs. SPYM.DE - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, H4ZJ.DE achieves a 15.19% return, which is significantly higher than SPYM.DE's 8.47% return. Over the past 10 years, H4ZJ.DE has outperformed SPYM.DE with an annualized return of 11.43%, while SPYM.DE has yielded a comparatively lower 4.56% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
H4ZJ.DE vs. SPYM.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
H4ZJ.DE has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than SPYM.DE's 0.18% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
H4ZJ.DE vs. SPYM.DE - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for HSBC MSCI World UCITS ETF USD (H4ZJ.DE) and SPDR MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF (SPYM.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
H4ZJ.DE vs. SPYM.DE - Dividend Comparison
H4ZJ.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.09%, while SPYM.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
H4ZJ.DE HSBC MSCI World UCITS ETF USD | 1.09% | 1.73% | 1.88% | 1.49% | 1.73% | 2.13% | 2.56% | 2.16% | 2.11% | 2.09% | 2.25% | 0.50% |
SPYM.DE SPDR MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
H4ZJ.DE vs. SPYM.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum H4ZJ.DE drawdown since its inception was -33.60%, smaller than the maximum SPYM.DE drawdown of -36.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for H4ZJ.DE and SPYM.DE. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
H4ZJ.DE vs. SPYM.DE - Volatility Comparison
HSBC MSCI World UCITS ETF USD (H4ZJ.DE) and SPDR MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF (SPYM.DE) have volatilities of 3.94% and 3.81%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.