H4Z7.DE vs. 10AJ.DE

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

H4Z7.DE (HSBC FTSE EPRA NAREIT Developed UCITS ETF USD (Acc)) and 10AJ.DE (Amundi Index FTSE EPRA NAREIT Global UCITS ETF EUR Dist) are both REIT funds tracking the FTSE EPRA/NAREIT Developed, from HSBC and Amundi respectively. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, H4Z7.DE returned 6.21%/yr vs 5.94%/yr for 10AJ.DE. With a 0.97 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. Both charge a 0.24% expense ratio.

Performance

H4Z7.DE vs. 10AJ.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in HSBC FTSE EPRA NAREIT Developed UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (H4Z7.DE) and Amundi Index FTSE EPRA NAREIT Global UCITS ETF EUR Dist (10AJ.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with H4Z7.DE having a 7.83% return and 10AJ.DE slightly higher at 7.96%.

H4Z7.DE

• 1D: -0.12%
• 1M: -2.61%
• YTD: 7.83%
• 6M: 7.26%
• 1Y: 9.73%
• 3Y*: 6.21%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

10AJ.DE

• 1D: -0.04%
• 1M: -2.40%
• YTD: 7.96%
• 6M: 7.43%
• 1Y: 9.54%
• 3Y*: 5.94%
• 5Y*: 1.87%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

H4Z7.DE vs. 10AJ.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
H4Z7.DE HSBC FTSE EPRA NAREIT Developed UCITS ETF USD (Acc)	7.83%	-1.78%	5.80%	7.39%	-13.07%
10AJ.DE Amundi Index FTSE EPRA NAREIT Global UCITS ETF EUR Dist	7.96%	-1.85%	5.52%	6.85%	-13.31%

Correlation

The correlation between H4Z7.DE and 10AJ.DE is 0.97 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.97
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.96
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 26, 2022	0.97

The correlation between H4Z7.DE and 10AJ.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.96 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

H4Z7.DE vs. 10AJ.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

H4Z7.DE

H4Z7.DE Risk / Return Rank: 25
H4Z7.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 25
H4Z7.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 24
H4Z7.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 24
H4Z7.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 26
H4Z7.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 28

10AJ.DE

10AJ.DE Risk / Return Rank: 25
10AJ.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 25
10AJ.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 24
10AJ.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 24
10AJ.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 26
10AJ.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 28

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

H4Z7.DE vs. 10AJ.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for HSBC FTSE EPRA NAREIT Developed UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (H4Z7.DE) and Amundi Index FTSE EPRA NAREIT Global UCITS ETF EUR Dist (10AJ.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	H4Z7.DE	10AJ.DE	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.86	0.85	+0.01
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.26	1.23	+0.03
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.15	1.15	0.00
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.23	1.20	+0.03
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	3.99	3.94	+0.05
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

H4Z7.DE vs. 10AJ.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current H4Z7.DE Sharpe Ratio is 0.86, which is comparable to the 10AJ.DE Sharpe Ratio of 0.85. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of H4Z7.DE and 10AJ.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	H4Z7.DE	10AJ.DE	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.86	0.85	+0.01
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.13	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.08	0.22	-0.14

Drawdowns

H4Z7.DE vs. 10AJ.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum H4Z7.DE drawdown since its inception was -26.78%, smaller than the maximum 10AJ.DE drawdown of -42.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for H4Z7.DE and 10AJ.DE.

Drawdown Indicators

	H4Z7.DE	10AJ.DE	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-26.78%	-42.62%	+15.84%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.86%	-7.89%	+0.03%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-20.13%	-20.52%	+0.39%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-30.01%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.86%	-6.63%	+3.77%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-11.53%	-12.13%	+0.60%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.42%	2.41%	+0.01%

Volatility

H4Z7.DE vs. 10AJ.DE - Volatility Comparison

HSBC FTSE EPRA NAREIT Developed UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (H4Z7.DE) has a higher volatility of 2.87% compared to Amundi Index FTSE EPRA NAREIT Global UCITS ETF EUR Dist (10AJ.DE) at 2.70%. This indicates that H4Z7.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than 10AJ.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	H4Z7.DE	10AJ.DE	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.87%	2.70%	+0.17%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.56%	8.38%	+0.18%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	11.25%	11.14%	+0.11%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	14.42%	14.60%	-0.18%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	14.42%	17.10%	-2.68%

H4Z7.DE vs. 10AJ.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both H4Z7.DE and 10AJ.DE have an expense ratio of 0.24%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

H4Z7.DE vs. 10AJ.DE - Dividend Comparison

H4Z7.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while 10AJ.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.77%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
10AJ.DE Amundi Index FTSE EPRA NAREIT Global UCITS ETF EUR Dist	2.77%	2.99%	2.94%	2.98%	3.23%	2.13%	3.10%	2.92%	2.63%
H4Z7.DE HSBC FTSE EPRA NAREIT Developed UCITS ETF USD (Acc)	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both H4Z7.DE and 10AJ.DE in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.97, H4Z7.DE and 10AJ.DE move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which ETF is better, H4Z7.DE or 10AJ.DE?

Both ETFs have the same 0.24% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, H4Z7.DE or 10AJ.DE?

H4Z7.DE and 10AJ.DE have the same expense ratio: 0.24% per year.

What is the main difference between H4Z7.DE and 10AJ.DE?

Both ETFs track FTSE EPRA/NAREIT Developed. They also come from different issuers: HSBC and Amundi.