PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
H410.DE vs. EMXC.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

H410.DE vs. EMXC.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in HSBC MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF USD (H410.DE) and Lyxor MSCI Emerging Markets Ex China UCITS ETF - Acc (EMXC.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, H410.DE achieves a 19.79% return, which is significantly lower than EMXC.DE's 30.36% return.


H410.DE

1D
-1.87%
1M
-8.04%
6M
12.07%
YTD
19.79%
1Y
34.11%
3Y*
18.31%
5Y*
6.91%
10Y*
8.22%

EMXC.DE

1D
-1.60%
1M
-10.29%
6M
21.10%
YTD
30.36%
1Y
48.18%
3Y*
21.90%
5Y*
11.87%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

H410.DE vs. EMXC.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
H410.DE
HSBC MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF USD
19.79%18.65%13.95%4.67%-13.87%4.04%6.95%9.82%
EMXC.DE
Lyxor MSCI Emerging Markets Ex China UCITS ETF - Acc
30.36%19.92%9.13%14.31%-13.59%17.56%2.25%-4.50%

Correlation

The correlation between H410.DE and EMXC.DE is 0.95, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.95

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.87

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.86

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 20, 2019

0.87

The correlation between H410.DE and EMXC.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.86 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

H410.DE vs. EMXC.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

H410.DE
H410.DE Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
H410.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
H410.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
H410.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
H410.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
H410.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank

EMXC.DE
EMXC.DE Risk / Return Rank: 8181
Overall Rank
EMXC.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EMXC.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
EMXC.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
EMXC.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
EMXC.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

H410.DE vs. EMXC.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for HSBC MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF USD (H410.DE) and Lyxor MSCI Emerging Markets Ex China UCITS ETF - Acc (EMXC.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


H410.DEEMXC.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.40

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.43

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.31

1.37

-0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.17

3.51

-0.34

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.64

12.15

-2.50

H410.DE vs. EMXC.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current H410.DE Sharpe Ratio is 1.69, which is comparable to the EMXC.DE Sharpe Ratio of 2.09. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of H410.DE and EMXC.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

H410.DE vs. EMXC.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum H410.DE drawdown since its inception was -41.02%, roughly equal to the maximum EMXC.DE drawdown of -40.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for H410.DE and EMXC.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


H410.DEEMXC.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-41.02%

-40.89%

-0.13%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.71%

-13.66%

+2.95%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.01%

-20.47%

+1.46%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.77%

-20.47%

-2.30%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-31.62%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-10.71%

-13.66%

+2.95%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-13.30%

-7.73%

-5.57%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.53%

3.95%

-0.42%

Volatility

H410.DE vs. EMXC.DE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for HSBC MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF USD (H410.DE) is 8.22%, while Lyxor MSCI Emerging Markets Ex China UCITS ETF - Acc (EMXC.DE) has a volatility of 9.94%. This indicates that H410.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EMXC.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


H410.DEEMXC.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.22%

9.94%

-1.72%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

17.70%

20.82%

-3.12%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.15%

23.00%

-2.85%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.18%

16.71%

+0.47%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.31%

19.20%

-0.89%

H410.DE vs. EMXC.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both H410.DE and EMXC.DE have an expense ratio of 0.15%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

H410.DE vs. EMXC.DE - Dividend Comparison

H410.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.71%, while EMXC.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EMXC.DE
Lyxor MSCI Emerging Markets Ex China UCITS ETF - Acc
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
H410.DE
HSBC MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF USD
1.71%2.00%2.40%2.59%3.11%2.00%1.69%2.03%2.20%1.62%1.71%2.28%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.95, H410.DE and EMXC.DE move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Both ETFs have the same 0.15% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

H410.DE and EMXC.DE have the same expense ratio: 0.15% per year.

H410.DE tracks MSCI Emerging Markets, while EMXC.DE tracks MSCI EM NR USD. They also come from different issuers: HSBC and Amundi.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for H410.DE and EMXC.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer