PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EMXC.DE vs. EPOL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EMXC.DE vs. EPOL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Lyxor MSCI Emerging Markets Ex China UCITS ETF - Acc (EMXC.DE) and iShares MSCI Poland ETF (EPOL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

EMXC.DE is traded in EUR, while EPOL is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the EPOL values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EMXC.DE achieves a 44.88% return, which is significantly higher than EPOL's 14.06% return.


EMXC.DE

1D
1.15%
1M
5.01%
YTD
44.88%
6M
47.41%
1Y
69.83%
3Y*
26.88%
5Y*
14.13%
10Y*

EPOL

1D
1.40%
1M
-1.76%
YTD
14.06%
6M
14.50%
1Y
34.67%
3Y*
30.50%
5Y*
16.65%
10Y*
11.65%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EMXC.DE vs. EPOL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
EMXC.DE
Lyxor MSCI Emerging Markets Ex China UCITS ETF - Acc
44.88%19.92%9.13%14.31%-13.59%17.56%2.25%-4.50%
EPOL
iShares MSCI Poland ETF
14.06%56.29%3.82%46.18%-19.95%20.60%-15.93%-7.12%

Correlation

The correlation between EMXC.DE and EPOL is 0.38, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.38

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.37

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.41

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 20, 2019

0.44

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EMXC.DE vs. EPOL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EMXC.DE
EMXC.DE Risk / Return Rank: 9494
Overall Rank
EMXC.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EMXC.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 9393
Sortino Ratio Rank
EMXC.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 9494
Omega Ratio Rank
EMXC.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
EMXC.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank

EPOL
EPOL Risk / Return Rank: 4848
Overall Rank
EPOL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4343
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EPOL Sortino Ratio Rank: 4343
Sortino Ratio Rank
EPOL Omega Ratio Rank: 3838
Omega Ratio Rank
EPOL Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
EPOL Martin Ratio Rank: 5151
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EMXC.DE vs. EPOL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lyxor MSCI Emerging Markets Ex China UCITS ETF - Acc (EMXC.DE) and iShares MSCI Poland ETF (EPOL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


EMXC.DEEPOLDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.60

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.66

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.58

1.26

+0.31

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.85

3.84

+2.01

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

21.06

9.93

+11.13

EMXC.DE vs. EPOL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EMXC.DE Sharpe Ratio is 3.23, which is higher than the EPOL Sharpe Ratio of 1.63. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EMXC.DE and EPOL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

EMXC.DE vs. EPOL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EMXC.DE drawdown since its inception was -40.89%, smaller than the maximum EPOL drawdown of -52.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EMXC.DE and EPOL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EMXC.DEEPOLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-40.89%

-52.18%

+11.29%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.87%

-9.08%

-2.79%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.47%

-17.83%

-2.64%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.47%

-45.52%

+25.05%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-52.18%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.04%

-3.47%

-0.57%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.72%

-16.57%

+8.85%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.30%

3.50%

-0.20%

Volatility

EMXC.DE vs. EPOL - Volatility Comparison

Lyxor MSCI Emerging Markets Ex China UCITS ETF - Acc (EMXC.DE) has a higher volatility of 10.10% compared to iShares MSCI Poland ETF (EPOL) at 6.83%. This indicates that EMXC.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EPOL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EMXC.DEEPOLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.10%

6.83%

+3.27%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

19.32%

16.42%

+2.90%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

21.53%

21.43%

+0.10%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.35%

26.18%

-9.83%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.03%

25.21%

-6.18%

EMXC.DE vs. EPOL - Expense Ratio Comparison

EMXC.DE has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than EPOL's 0.61% expense ratio.


Dividends

EMXC.DE vs. EPOL - Dividend Comparison

EMXC.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while EPOL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.82%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EMXC.DE
Lyxor MSCI Emerging Markets Ex China UCITS ETF - Acc
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
EPOL
iShares MSCI Poland ETF
3.82%4.78%6.04%2.87%2.65%1.33%1.44%2.51%1.44%1.88%2.14%2.53%

Frequently Asked Questions


EMXC.DE and EPOL have a correlation of 0.38, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, EMXC.DE is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

EMXC.DE is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.61% for EPOL.

EMXC.DE is categorized as Emerging Markets Equities, while EPOL is Europe Equities. EMXC.DE tracks MSCI EM NR USD, while EPOL tracks MSCI Poland Investable Market Index. They also come from different issuers: Amundi and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for EMXC.DE and 0.61% for EPOL.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EMXC.DE and EPOL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer