PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
H2O.DE vs. ESIH.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

H2O.DE vs. ESIH.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Enapter AG (H2O.DE) and iShares MSCI Europe Health Care Sector UCITS ETF (ESIH.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

H2O.DE is traded in EUR, while ESIH.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the ESIH.L values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, H2O.DE achieves a -16.72% return, which is significantly lower than ESIH.L's -1.85% return.


H2O.DE

1D
-4.05%
1M
16.39%
YTD
-16.72%
6M
-34.86%
1Y
-49.29%
3Y*
-51.11%
5Y*
-44.30%
10Y*

ESIH.L

1D
2.97%
1M
1.59%
YTD
-1.85%
6M
-0.51%
1Y
6.04%
3Y*
2.67%
5Y*
5.75%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

H2O.DE vs. ESIH.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
H2O.DE
Enapter AG
-16.72%-58.92%-58.42%-29.96%-38.97%-12.47%-40.87%
ESIH.L
iShares MSCI Europe Health Care Sector UCITS ETF
-1.83%6.88%4.34%7.67%-3.68%24.71%0.15%

Correlation

The correlation between H2O.DE and ESIH.L is -0.03, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.03

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.01

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.02

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 24, 2020

0.02

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

H2O.DE vs. ESIH.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

H2O.DE
H2O.DE Risk / Return Rank: 1010
Overall Rank
H2O.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
Sharpe Ratio Rank
H2O.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
Sortino Ratio Rank
H2O.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 1010
Omega Ratio Rank
H2O.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 1212
Calmar Ratio Rank
H2O.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 1414
Martin Ratio Rank

ESIH.L
ESIH.L Risk / Return Rank: 1717
Overall Rank
ESIH.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1818
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ESIH.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 1818
Sortino Ratio Rank
ESIH.L Omega Ratio Rank: 1717
Omega Ratio Rank
ESIH.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 1717
Calmar Ratio Rank
ESIH.L Martin Ratio Rank: 1717
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

H2O.DE vs. ESIH.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Enapter AG (H2O.DE) and iShares MSCI Europe Health Care Sector UCITS ETF (ESIH.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


H2O.DEESIH.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.16

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.96

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.86

1.08

-0.22

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.79

0.47

-1.25

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.22

1.04

-2.26

H2O.DE vs. ESIH.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current H2O.DE Sharpe Ratio is -0.80, which is lower than the ESIH.L Sharpe Ratio of 0.36. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of H2O.DE and ESIH.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


H2O.DEESIH.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.80

0.36

-1.16

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.89

0.37

-1.26

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.77

0.42

-1.19

Drawdowns

H2O.DE vs. ESIH.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum H2O.DE drawdown since its inception was -98.00%, which is greater than ESIH.L's maximum drawdown of -25.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for H2O.DE and ESIH.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


H2O.DEESIH.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-98.00%

-25.54%

-72.46%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-63.67%

-12.93%

-50.74%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-91.68%

-25.54%

-66.14%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-96.32%

-25.54%

-70.78%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-97.39%

-11.03%

-86.36%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-76.16%

-7.22%

-68.94%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

41.03%

5.81%

+35.22%

Volatility

H2O.DE vs. ESIH.L - Volatility Comparison

Enapter AG (H2O.DE) has a higher volatility of 18.97% compared to iShares MSCI Europe Health Care Sector UCITS ETF (ESIH.L) at 5.28%. This indicates that H2O.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ESIH.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


H2O.DEESIH.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

18.97%

5.28%

+13.69%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

35.77%

11.85%

+23.92%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

62.47%

16.89%

+45.58%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

49.20%

15.72%

+33.48%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

61.41%

15.50%

+45.91%

Dividends

H2O.DE vs. ESIH.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither H2O.DE nor ESIH.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


H2O.DE and ESIH.L have a correlation of -0.03, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for H2O.DE and ESIH.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer