GZIRX vs. FPFIX
GZIRX (Goldman Sachs Strategic Income Fund) and FPFIX (FPA Flexible Fixed Income Fund) are both Nontraditional Bonds funds. Over the past 5 years, GZIRX returned 4.18%/yr vs 3.50%/yr for FPFIX. At a 0.34 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. GZIRX charges 0.78%/yr vs 0.51%/yr for FPFIX.
Performance
GZIRX vs. FPFIX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GZIRX achieves a 0.88% return, which is significantly higher than FPFIX's -0.11% return.
GZIRX
- 1D
- -0.10%
- 1M
- 0.82%
- YTD
- 0.88%
- 6M
- 1.84%
- 1Y
- 7.55%
- 3Y*
- 7.51%
- 5Y*
- 4.18%
- 10Y*
- 3.52%
FPFIX
- 1D
- -0.10%
- 1M
- -0.18%
- YTD
- -0.11%
- 6M
- 0.20%
- 1Y
- 4.07%
- 3Y*
- 5.78%
- 5Y*
- 3.50%
- 10Y*
- —
GZIRX vs. FPFIX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GZIRX Goldman Sachs Strategic Income Fund | 0.88% | 8.49% | 6.13% | 10.37% | -3.83% | -1.44% | 9.51% | 5.84% |
FPFIX FPA Flexible Fixed Income Fund | -0.11% | 6.87% | 5.28% | 8.11% | -2.82% | 1.77% | 4.71% | 3.78% |
Correlation
The correlation between GZIRX and FPFIX is 0.47, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.47 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.50 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.44 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2019 | 0.34 |
The correlation between GZIRX and FPFIX shifts across timeframes, from 0.34 (all time) to 0.50 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GZIRX vs. FPFIX — Risk / Return Rank
GZIRX
FPFIX
GZIRX vs. FPFIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs Strategic Income Fund (GZIRX) and FPA Flexible Fixed Income Fund (FPFIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GZIRX | FPFIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.75 | 1.62 | +1.13 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 4.18 | 2.42 | +1.76 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.60 | 1.32 | +0.29 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.91 | 1.94 | +0.97 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.69 | 5.74 | +7.94 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GZIRX | FPFIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.75 | 1.62 | +1.13 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.24 | 1.52 | -0.28 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.95 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.92 | 1.76 | -0.85 |
Drawdowns
GZIRX vs. FPFIX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GZIRX drawdown since its inception was -13.90%, which is greater than FPFIX's maximum drawdown of -4.11%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GZIRX and FPFIX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GZIRX | FPFIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -13.90% | -4.11% | -9.79% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.72% | -2.10% | -0.62% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -3.15% | -2.10% | -1.05% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -7.86% | -4.11% | -3.75% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -13.90% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.10% | -1.51% | +1.41% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.78% | -0.59% | -1.19% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.58% | 0.71% | -0.13% |
Volatility
GZIRX vs. FPFIX - Volatility Comparison
Goldman Sachs Strategic Income Fund (GZIRX) and FPA Flexible Fixed Income Fund (FPFIX) have volatilities of 0.79% and 0.79%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GZIRX | FPFIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.79% | 0.79% | 0.00% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.41% | 1.75% | +0.66% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.81% | 2.46% | +0.35% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 3.39% | 2.32% | +1.07% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 3.72% | 2.08% | +1.64% |
GZIRX vs. FPFIX - Expense Ratio Comparison
GZIRX has a 0.78% expense ratio, which is higher than FPFIX's 0.51% expense ratio.
Dividends
GZIRX vs. FPFIX - Dividend Comparison
GZIRX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.31%, more than FPFIX's 3.74% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FPFIX FPA Flexible Fixed Income Fund | 3.74% | 3.78% | 4.76% | 3.95% | 2.92% | 2.26% | 3.00% | 2.42% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
GZIRX Goldman Sachs Strategic Income Fund | 4.31% | 4.06% | 6.61% | 3.36% | 2.38% | 2.34% | 3.76% | 3.38% | 2.66% | 1.33% | 2.18% | 4.59% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GZIRX and FPFIX have a correlation of 0.47, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FPFIX has higher volatility (0.79%) compared to GZIRX (0.79%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GZIRX dropped -13.90% vs FPFIX's -4.11%.
GZIRX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.75 vs 1.62), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GZIRX and FPFIX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer