PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GZIRX vs. FPFIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GZIRX vs. FPFIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Goldman Sachs Strategic Income Fund (GZIRX) and FPA Flexible Fixed Income Fund (FPFIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GZIRX achieves a 0.88% return, which is significantly higher than FPFIX's -0.11% return.


GZIRX

1D
-0.10%
1M
0.82%
YTD
0.88%
6M
1.84%
1Y
7.55%
3Y*
7.51%
5Y*
4.18%
10Y*
3.52%

FPFIX

1D
-0.10%
1M
-0.18%
YTD
-0.11%
6M
0.20%
1Y
4.07%
3Y*
5.78%
5Y*
3.50%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GZIRX vs. FPFIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
GZIRX
Goldman Sachs Strategic Income Fund
0.88%8.49%6.13%10.37%-3.83%-1.44%9.51%5.84%
FPFIX
FPA Flexible Fixed Income Fund
-0.11%6.87%5.28%8.11%-2.82%1.77%4.71%3.78%

Correlation

The correlation between GZIRX and FPFIX is 0.47, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.47

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.50

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.44

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2019

0.34

The correlation between GZIRX and FPFIX shifts across timeframes, from 0.34 (all time) to 0.50 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GZIRX vs. FPFIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GZIRX
GZIRX Risk / Return Rank: 7878
Overall Rank
GZIRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GZIRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8888
Sortino Ratio Rank
GZIRX Omega Ratio Rank: 8787
Omega Ratio Rank
GZIRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5757
Calmar Ratio Rank
GZIRX Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank

FPFIX
FPFIX Risk / Return Rank: 2929
Overall Rank
FPFIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3131
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FPFIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3333
Sortino Ratio Rank
FPFIX Omega Ratio Rank: 3535
Omega Ratio Rank
FPFIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2626
Calmar Ratio Rank
FPFIX Martin Ratio Rank: 2121
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GZIRX vs. FPFIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs Strategic Income Fund (GZIRX) and FPA Flexible Fixed Income Fund (FPFIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GZIRXFPFIXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.75

1.62

+1.13

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

4.18

2.42

+1.76

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.60

1.32

+0.29

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.91

1.94

+0.97

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

13.69

5.74

+7.94

GZIRX vs. FPFIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GZIRX Sharpe Ratio is 2.75, which is higher than the FPFIX Sharpe Ratio of 1.62. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GZIRX and FPFIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GZIRXFPFIXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.75

1.62

+1.13

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.24

1.52

-0.28

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.95

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.92

1.76

-0.85

Drawdowns

GZIRX vs. FPFIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GZIRX drawdown since its inception was -13.90%, which is greater than FPFIX's maximum drawdown of -4.11%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GZIRX and FPFIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GZIRXFPFIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-13.90%

-4.11%

-9.79%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.72%

-2.10%

-0.62%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-3.15%

-2.10%

-1.05%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-7.86%

-4.11%

-3.75%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-13.90%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.10%

-1.51%

+1.41%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.78%

-0.59%

-1.19%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.58%

0.71%

-0.13%

Volatility

GZIRX vs. FPFIX - Volatility Comparison

Goldman Sachs Strategic Income Fund (GZIRX) and FPA Flexible Fixed Income Fund (FPFIX) have volatilities of 0.79% and 0.79%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GZIRXFPFIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.79%

0.79%

0.00%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.41%

1.75%

+0.66%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.81%

2.46%

+0.35%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

3.39%

2.32%

+1.07%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

3.72%

2.08%

+1.64%

GZIRX vs. FPFIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

GZIRX has a 0.78% expense ratio, which is higher than FPFIX's 0.51% expense ratio.


Dividends

GZIRX vs. FPFIX - Dividend Comparison

GZIRX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.31%, more than FPFIX's 3.74% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FPFIX
FPA Flexible Fixed Income Fund
3.74%3.78%4.76%3.95%2.92%2.26%3.00%2.42%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
GZIRX
Goldman Sachs Strategic Income Fund
4.31%4.06%6.61%3.36%2.38%2.34%3.76%3.38%2.66%1.33%2.18%4.59%

Frequently Asked Questions


GZIRX and FPFIX have a correlation of 0.47, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FPFIX has higher volatility (0.79%) compared to GZIRX (0.79%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GZIRX dropped -13.90% vs FPFIX's -4.11%.

GZIRX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.75 vs 1.62), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GZIRX and FPFIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer