PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FPFIX vs. RWDIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FPFIX vs. RWDIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FPA Flexible Fixed Income Fund (FPFIX) and Redwood Managed Volatility Fund (RWDIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FPFIX achieves a -0.11% return, which is significantly lower than RWDIX's 1.32% return.


FPFIX

1D
-0.10%
1M
-0.18%
YTD
-0.11%
6M
0.20%
1Y
4.07%
3Y*
5.78%
5Y*
3.50%
10Y*

RWDIX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.27%
YTD
1.32%
6M
1.83%
1Y
6.17%
3Y*
4.61%
5Y*
0.28%
10Y*
1.84%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FPFIX vs. RWDIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
FPFIX
FPA Flexible Fixed Income Fund
-0.11%6.87%5.28%8.11%-2.82%1.77%4.71%3.78%
RWDIX
Redwood Managed Volatility Fund
1.32%4.75%6.63%1.04%-11.18%0.52%-1.93%9.04%

Correlation

The correlation between FPFIX and RWDIX is 0.41, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.41

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.47

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.47

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2019

0.32

The correlation between FPFIX and RWDIX shifts across timeframes, from 0.32 (all time) to 0.47 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FPFIX vs. RWDIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FPFIX
FPFIX Risk / Return Rank: 2929
Overall Rank
FPFIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3131
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FPFIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3333
Sortino Ratio Rank
FPFIX Omega Ratio Rank: 3535
Omega Ratio Rank
FPFIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2626
Calmar Ratio Rank
FPFIX Martin Ratio Rank: 2121
Martin Ratio Rank

RWDIX
RWDIX Risk / Return Rank: 8484
Overall Rank
RWDIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RWDIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9191
Sortino Ratio Rank
RWDIX Omega Ratio Rank: 9191
Omega Ratio Rank
RWDIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
RWDIX Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FPFIX vs. RWDIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FPA Flexible Fixed Income Fund (FPFIX) and Redwood Managed Volatility Fund (RWDIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FPFIXRWDIXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.62

2.88

-1.25

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.42

4.48

-2.06

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.32

1.66

-0.34

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.94

3.22

-1.27

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

5.74

15.29

-9.55

FPFIX vs. RWDIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FPFIX Sharpe Ratio is 1.62, which is lower than the RWDIX Sharpe Ratio of 2.88. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FPFIX and RWDIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FPFIXRWDIXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.62

2.88

-1.25

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.52

0.06

+1.46

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.43

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.76

0.45

+1.31

Drawdowns

FPFIX vs. RWDIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FPFIX drawdown since its inception was -4.11%, smaller than the maximum RWDIX drawdown of -16.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FPFIX and RWDIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FPFIXRWDIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-4.11%

-16.69%

+12.58%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.10%

-1.95%

-0.15%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-2.10%

-4.96%

+2.86%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-4.11%

-16.10%

+11.99%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-16.69%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.51%

-0.46%

-1.05%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.59%

-4.42%

+3.83%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.71%

0.41%

+0.30%

Volatility

FPFIX vs. RWDIX - Volatility Comparison

FPA Flexible Fixed Income Fund (FPFIX) has a higher volatility of 0.79% compared to Redwood Managed Volatility Fund (RWDIX) at 0.70%. This indicates that FPFIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RWDIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FPFIXRWDIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.79%

0.70%

+0.09%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.75%

1.73%

+0.02%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.46%

2.17%

+0.29%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

2.32%

4.69%

-2.37%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

2.08%

4.30%

-2.22%

FPFIX vs. RWDIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FPFIX has a 0.51% expense ratio, which is lower than RWDIX's 1.56% expense ratio.


Dividends

FPFIX vs. RWDIX - Dividend Comparison

FPFIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.74%, less than RWDIX's 4.97% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FPFIX
FPA Flexible Fixed Income Fund
3.74%3.78%4.76%3.95%2.92%2.26%3.00%2.42%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
RWDIX
Redwood Managed Volatility Fund
4.97%4.90%5.82%7.60%0.47%6.36%5.42%3.59%2.59%5.52%5.14%1.17%

Frequently Asked Questions


FPFIX and RWDIX have a correlation of 0.41, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FPFIX has higher volatility (0.79%) compared to RWDIX (0.70%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FPFIX dropped -4.11% vs RWDIX's -16.69%.

RWDIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.88 vs 1.62), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FPFIX and RWDIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer