GZIRX vs. TTRZX

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

GZIRX (Goldman Sachs Strategic Income Fund) and TTRZX (Templeton Global Total Return Fund) are both Nontraditional Bonds funds. Over the past 10 years, GZIRX returned 3.72%/yr vs 1.12%/yr for TTRZX. At a 0.38 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. GZIRX charges 0.78%/yr vs 0.89%/yr for TTRZX.

Performance

GZIRX vs. TTRZX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Goldman Sachs Strategic Income Fund (GZIRX) and Templeton Global Total Return Fund (TTRZX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GZIRX achieves a 1.72% return, which is significantly lower than TTRZX's 1.92% return. Over the past 10 years, GZIRX has outperformed TTRZX with an annualized return of 3.72%, while TTRZX has yielded a comparatively lower 1.12% annualized return.

GZIRX

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 1.13%
• YTD: 1.72%
• 6M: 2.27%
• 1Y: 7.98%
• 3Y*: 7.81%
• 5Y*: 4.40%
• 10Y*: 3.72%

TTRZX

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.60%
• YTD: 1.92%
• 6M: 2.34%
• 1Y: 9.38%
• 3Y*: 5.92%
• 5Y*: 0.15%
• 10Y*: 1.12%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GZIRX vs. TTRZX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
GZIRX Goldman Sachs Strategic Income Fund	1.72%	8.49%	6.13%	10.37%	-3.83%	-1.44%	9.51%	5.96%	-2.25%	-0.15%
TTRZX Templeton Global Total Return Fund	1.92%	18.26%	-6.61%	6.28%	-12.29%	-5.14%	-5.58%	2.01%	2.03%	3.09%

Correlation

The correlation between GZIRX and TTRZX is 0.49, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.49
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.37
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.39
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.34
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2011	0.38

The correlation between GZIRX and TTRZX shifts across timeframes, from 0.34 (10 years) to 0.49 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

GZIRX vs. TTRZX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GZIRX

GZIRX Risk / Return Rank: 85
GZIRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 93
GZIRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 93
GZIRX Omega Ratio Rank: 91
GZIRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 67
GZIRX Martin Ratio Rank: 81

TTRZX

TTRZX Risk / Return Rank: 21
TTRZX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 23
TTRZX Sortino Ratio Rank: 23
TTRZX Omega Ratio Rank: 25
TTRZX Calmar Ratio Rank: 17
TTRZX Martin Ratio Rank: 19

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GZIRX vs. TTRZX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs Strategic Income Fund (GZIRX) and Templeton Global Total Return Fund (TTRZX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	GZIRX	TTRZX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.89	1.26	+1.63
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	4.42	1.83	+2.59
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.64	1.24	+0.40
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.01	1.36	+1.65
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	14.07	4.50	+9.56

GZIRX vs. TTRZX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GZIRX Sharpe Ratio is 2.89, which is higher than the TTRZX Sharpe Ratio of 1.26. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GZIRX and TTRZX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

GZIRX vs. TTRZX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GZIRX drawdown since its inception was -13.90%, smaller than the maximum TTRZX drawdown of -33.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GZIRX and TTRZX.

Drawdown Indicators

	GZIRX	TTRZX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-13.90%	-33.17%	+19.27%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-2.72%	-6.95%	+4.23%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-3.15%	-11.49%	+8.34%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-7.86%	-26.45%	+18.59%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-13.90%	-33.17%	+19.27%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-8.74%	+8.74%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.77%	-7.61%	+5.84%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.58%	2.09%	-1.51%

Volatility

GZIRX vs. TTRZX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Goldman Sachs Strategic Income Fund (GZIRX) is 0.61%, while Templeton Global Total Return Fund (TTRZX) has a volatility of 1.91%. This indicates that GZIRX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TTRZX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	GZIRX	TTRZX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.61%	1.91%	-1.30%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	2.39%	6.25%	-3.86%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.83%	7.48%	-4.65%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	3.39%	9.23%	-5.84%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	3.72%	7.91%	-4.19%

GZIRX vs. TTRZX - Expense Ratio Comparison

GZIRX has a 0.78% expense ratio, which is lower than TTRZX's 0.89% expense ratio.

Dividends

GZIRX vs. TTRZX - Dividend Comparison

GZIRX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.28%, less than TTRZX's 6.95% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
GZIRX Goldman Sachs Strategic Income Fund	4.28%	4.06%	6.61%	3.36%	2.38%	2.34%	3.76%	3.38%	2.66%	1.33%	2.18%	4.59%
TTRZX Templeton Global Total Return Fund	6.95%	5.57%	8.19%	5.95%	7.54%	8.18%	4.84%	6.96%	5.55%	3.54%	2.94%	4.31%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both GZIRX and TTRZX in my portfolio?

GZIRX and TTRZX have a correlation of 0.49, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, GZIRX or TTRZX?

TTRZX has higher volatility (1.91%) compared to GZIRX (0.61%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GZIRX dropped -13.90% vs TTRZX's -33.17%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

GZIRX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.89 vs 1.26), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.