GYLD vs. THRV
GYLD (Arrow Dow Jones Global Yield ETF) and THRV (Prospera Income ETF) are both Diversified Portfolio funds. GYLD is passively managed, while THRV is actively managed. At a 0.35 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. GYLD charges 0.75%/yr vs 1.80%/yr for THRV.
Performance
GYLD vs. THRV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GYLD achieves a 7.91% return, which is significantly higher than THRV's 1.86% return.
GYLD
- 1D
- -0.42%
- 1M
- -0.76%
- YTD
- 7.91%
- 6M
- 10.25%
- 1Y
- 15.94%
- 3Y*
- 15.50%
- 5Y*
- 6.21%
- 10Y*
- 4.68%
THRV
- 1D
- -0.38%
- 1M
- 0.32%
- YTD
- 1.86%
- 6M
- 1.66%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
GYLD vs. THRV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
GYLD Arrow Dow Jones Global Yield ETF | 7.91% | 3.40% |
THRV Prospera Income ETF | 1.86% | 0.16% |
Correlation
The correlation between GYLD and THRV is 0.35, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 1, 2025 | 0.35 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GYLD vs. THRV — Risk / Return Rank
GYLD
THRV
GYLD vs. THRV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Arrow Dow Jones Global Yield ETF (GYLD) and Prospera Income ETF (THRV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GYLD | THRV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.23 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.29 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.19 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GYLD | THRV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.26 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.45 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.28 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.21 | 1.04 | -0.84 |
Drawdowns
GYLD vs. THRV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GYLD drawdown since its inception was -55.03%, which is greater than THRV's maximum drawdown of -1.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GYLD and THRV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GYLD | THRV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -55.03% | -1.50% | -53.53% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -4.86% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -8.37% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -20.24% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -47.89% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.71% | -0.51% | -1.20% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -14.41% | -0.44% | -13.97% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.74% | — | — |
Volatility
GYLD vs. THRV - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GYLD | THRV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.16% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.39% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.78% | 2.92% | +9.86% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.79% | 2.92% | +10.87% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.58% | 2.92% | +13.66% |
GYLD vs. THRV - Expense Ratio Comparison
GYLD has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than THRV's 1.80% expense ratio.
Dividends
GYLD vs. THRV - Dividend Comparison
GYLD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.37%, more than THRV's 4.71% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GYLD Arrow Dow Jones Global Yield ETF | 7.37% | 8.43% | 12.90% | 7.13% | 4.64% | 5.50% | 7.42% | 5.83% | 8.17% | 6.78% | 7.29% | 10.35% |
THRV Prospera Income ETF | 4.71% | 1.67% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GYLD and THRV have a correlation of 0.35, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, GYLD is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
GYLD is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 1.80% for THRV.
GYLD has the higher dividend yield at 7.37%, compared with 4.71% for THRV.
They also come from different issuers: Arrow Funds and Prospera Funds. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for GYLD and 1.80% for THRV.
Find the right allocation for GYLD and THRV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer