GYLD vs. CTAP

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

GYLD (Arrow Dow Jones Global Yield ETF) and CTAP (Simplify US Equity PLUS Managed Futures Strategy ETF) are both Diversified Portfolio funds. GYLD is passively managed, while CTAP is actively managed. At a 0.27 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. GYLD charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.10%/yr for CTAP.

Performance

GYLD vs. CTAP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Arrow Dow Jones Global Yield ETF (GYLD) and Simplify US Equity PLUS Managed Futures Strategy ETF (CTAP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GYLD achieves a 7.29% return, which is significantly higher than CTAP's 5.23% return.

GYLD

• 1D: -0.70%
• 1M: -1.41%
• YTD: 7.29%
• 6M: 7.99%
• 1Y: 16.25%
• 3Y*: 15.08%
• 5Y*: 6.08%
• 10Y*: 4.72%

CTAP

• 1D: -2.94%
• 1M: -14.89%
• YTD: 5.23%
• 6M: 3.79%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GYLD vs. CTAP - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
GYLD Arrow Dow Jones Global Yield ETF	7.29%	2.51%
CTAP Simplify US Equity PLUS Managed Futures Strategy ETF	5.23%	2.22%

Correlation

The correlation between GYLD and CTAP is 0.27, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 9, 2025	0.27

Return for Risk

GYLD vs. CTAP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GYLD

GYLD Risk / Return Rank: 50
GYLD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 39
GYLD Sortino Ratio Rank: 41
GYLD Omega Ratio Rank: 40
GYLD Calmar Ratio Rank: 71
GYLD Martin Ratio Rank: 57

CTAP

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GYLD vs. CTAP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Arrow Dow Jones Global Yield ETF (GYLD) and Simplify US Equity PLUS Managed Futures Strategy ETF (CTAP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	GYLD	CTAP	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.32	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.99	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.25	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.36	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	9.53	—	—

Drawdowns

GYLD vs. CTAP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GYLD drawdown since its inception was -55.03%, which is greater than CTAP's maximum drawdown of -17.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GYLD and CTAP.

Drawdown Indicators

	GYLD	CTAP	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-55.03%	-17.57%	-37.46%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-4.86%	—	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-8.37%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-19.37%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-47.89%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.28%	-17.57%	+15.29%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-14.36%	-3.10%	-11.26%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.71%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	GYLD	CTAP	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.27%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.40%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.33%	24.63%	-12.30%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	13.80%	24.63%	-10.83%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.51%	24.63%	-8.12%

GYLD vs. CTAP - Expense Ratio Comparison

GYLD has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than CTAP's 0.10% expense ratio.

Dividends

GYLD vs. CTAP - Dividend Comparison

GYLD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.55%, more than CTAP's 0.75% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
CTAP Simplify US Equity PLUS Managed Futures Strategy ETF	0.75%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
GYLD Arrow Dow Jones Global Yield ETF	7.55%	8.43%	12.90%	7.13%	4.64%	5.50%	7.42%	5.83%	8.17%	6.78%	7.29%	10.35%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both GYLD and CTAP in my portfolio?

GYLD and CTAP have a correlation of 0.27, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, GYLD or CTAP?

On fees, CTAP is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, GYLD or CTAP?

CTAP is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for GYLD.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, GYLD or CTAP?

GYLD has the higher dividend yield at 7.55%, compared with 0.75% for CTAP.

What is the main difference between GYLD and CTAP?

They also come from different issuers: Arrow Funds and Simplify. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for GYLD and 0.10% for CTAP.