PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GYLD vs. BIL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GYLD vs. BIL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Arrow Dow Jones Global Yield ETF (GYLD) and SPDR Bloomberg 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF (BIL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GYLD achieves a 7.29% return, which is significantly higher than BIL's 1.67% return. Over the past 10 years, GYLD has outperformed BIL with an annualized return of 4.72%, while BIL has yielded a comparatively lower 2.20% annualized return.


GYLD

1D
-0.70%
1M
-1.41%
YTD
7.29%
6M
7.99%
1Y
16.25%
3Y*
15.08%
5Y*
6.08%
10Y*
4.72%

BIL

1D
0.01%
1M
0.28%
YTD
1.67%
6M
1.76%
1Y
3.84%
3Y*
4.60%
5Y*
3.45%
10Y*
2.20%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GYLD vs. BIL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
GYLD
Arrow Dow Jones Global Yield ETF
7.29%19.85%3.83%10.36%-7.73%18.03%-11.17%13.29%-9.97%4.33%
BIL
SPDR Bloomberg 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF
1.67%4.15%5.19%4.94%1.40%-0.10%0.40%2.03%1.74%0.69%

Correlation

The correlation between GYLD and BIL is -0.07, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.07

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.00

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.00

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.00

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 8, 2012

0.01

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GYLD vs. BIL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GYLD
GYLD Risk / Return Rank: 5050
Overall Rank
GYLD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3939
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GYLD Sortino Ratio Rank: 4141
Sortino Ratio Rank
GYLD Omega Ratio Rank: 4040
Omega Ratio Rank
GYLD Calmar Ratio Rank: 7171
Calmar Ratio Rank
GYLD Martin Ratio Rank: 5757
Martin Ratio Rank

BIL
BIL Risk / Return Rank: 100100
Overall Rank
BIL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100100
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BIL Sortino Ratio Rank: 100100
Sortino Ratio Rank
BIL Omega Ratio Rank: 100100
Omega Ratio Rank
BIL Calmar Ratio Rank: 100100
Calmar Ratio Rank
BIL Martin Ratio Rank: 100100
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GYLD vs. BIL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Arrow Dow Jones Global Yield ETF (GYLD) and SPDR Bloomberg 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF (BIL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


GYLDBILDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-18.00

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-170.68

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

87.16

-85.91

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.36

352.24

-348.89

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.53

2,793.11

-2,783.58

GYLD vs. BIL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GYLD Sharpe Ratio is 1.32, which is lower than the BIL Sharpe Ratio of 19.32. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GYLD and BIL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

GYLD vs. BIL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GYLD drawdown since its inception was -55.03%, which is greater than BIL's maximum drawdown of -0.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GYLD and BIL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GYLDBILDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-55.03%

-0.78%

-54.25%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.86%

-0.01%

-4.85%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-8.37%

-0.01%

-8.36%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.37%

-0.09%

-19.28%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-47.89%

-0.21%

-47.68%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.28%

0.00%

-2.28%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-14.36%

-0.26%

-14.10%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.71%

0.00%

+1.71%

Volatility

GYLD vs. BIL - Volatility Comparison

Arrow Dow Jones Global Yield ETF (GYLD) has a higher volatility of 3.27% compared to SPDR Bloomberg 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF (BIL) at 0.07%. This indicates that GYLD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BIL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GYLDBILDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.27%

0.07%

+3.20%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.40%

0.14%

+9.26%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.33%

0.20%

+12.13%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.80%

0.26%

+13.54%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.51%

0.26%

+16.25%

GYLD vs. BIL - Expense Ratio Comparison

GYLD has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than BIL's 0.14% expense ratio.


Dividends

GYLD vs. BIL - Dividend Comparison

GYLD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.55%, more than BIL's 3.85% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BIL
SPDR Bloomberg 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF
3.85%4.13%5.03%4.92%1.35%0.00%0.30%2.05%1.66%0.68%0.07%0.00%
GYLD
Arrow Dow Jones Global Yield ETF
7.55%8.43%12.90%7.13%4.64%5.50%7.42%5.83%8.17%6.78%7.29%10.35%

Frequently Asked Questions


GYLD and BIL have a correlation of -0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GYLD has higher volatility (3.27%) compared to BIL (0.07%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GYLD dropped -55.03% vs BIL's -0.78%.

On 10-year performance, GYLD leads with 4.72% vs 2.20% for BIL. On fees, BIL is cheaper at 0.14% per year. On volatility, BIL has been the lower-risk option at 0.07%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, GYLD has performed better with a 4.72% return vs 2.20%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

BIL is cheaper with a 0.14% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for GYLD.

GYLD has the higher dividend yield at 7.55%, compared with 3.85% for BIL.

GYLD is categorized as Diversified Portfolio, while BIL is Government Bonds. GYLD tracks DJ Brookfield Global Infrastructure Composite Yield, while BIL tracks Bloomberg 1-3 Month U.S. Treasury Bill Index. They also come from different issuers: Arrow Funds and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for GYLD and 0.14% for BIL.

BIL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (19.32 vs 1.32), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GYLD and BIL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer