GXXIX vs. STK
Compare and contrast key facts about abrdn U.S. Sustainable Leaders Fund (GXXIX) and Columbia Seligman Premium Technology Growth Closed Fund (STK).
GXXIX is managed by Aberdeen. It was launched on Jun 30, 2000. STK is an actively managed fund by Aberdeen. It was launched on Nov 25, 2009.
Performance
GXXIX vs. STK - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
GXXIX vs. STK - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GXXIX abrdn U.S. Sustainable Leaders Fund | -7.53% | 3.82% | 10.11% | 15.19% | -26.55% | 81.37% | 29.56% | 36.96% | -6.73% | 20.42% |
STK Columbia Seligman Premium Technology Growth Closed Fund | 7.23% | 24.85% | 17.74% | 46.60% | -30.36% | 48.63% | 25.39% | 52.73% | -14.91% | 33.52% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GXXIX achieves a -7.53% return, which is significantly lower than STK's 7.23% return. Over the past 10 years, GXXIX has underperformed STK with an annualized return of 13.33%, while STK has yielded a comparatively higher 19.36% annualized return.
GXXIX
- 1D
- 2.82%
- 1M
- -5.54%
- YTD
- -7.53%
- 6M
- -7.78%
- 1Y
- 2.72%
- 3Y*
- 5.62%
- 5Y*
- 9.27%
- 10Y*
- 13.33%
STK
- 1D
- 2.79%
- 1M
- -3.99%
- YTD
- 7.23%
- 6M
- 13.94%
- 1Y
- 50.57%
- 3Y*
- 23.77%
- 5Y*
- 15.10%
- 10Y*
- 19.36%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
GXXIX vs. STK - Expense Ratio Comparison
GXXIX has a 0.97% expense ratio, which is lower than STK's 1.26% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
GXXIX vs. STK — Risk / Return Rank
GXXIX
STK
GXXIX vs. STK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for abrdn U.S. Sustainable Leaders Fund (GXXIX) and Columbia Seligman Premium Technology Growth Closed Fund (STK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GXXIX | STK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.19 | 1.97 | -1.79 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.40 | 2.70 | -2.30 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.05 | 1.38 | -0.33 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.31 | 3.73 | -3.43 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.15 | 13.76 | -12.61 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GXXIX | STK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.19 | 1.97 | -1.79 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.34 | 0.61 | -0.27 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.56 | 0.75 | -0.19 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.60 | 0.65 | -0.04 |
Correlation
The correlation between GXXIX and STK is 0.65, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
GXXIX vs. STK - Dividend Comparison
GXXIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.48%, less than STK's 6.96% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GXXIX abrdn U.S. Sustainable Leaders Fund | 2.48% | 2.30% | 0.00% | 0.28% | 0.39% | 59.39% | 14.10% | 9.76% | 12.93% | 10.11% | 12.20% | 5.82% |
STK Columbia Seligman Premium Technology Growth Closed Fund | 6.96% | 7.38% | 16.02% | 6.70% | 12.62% | 8.48% | 6.79% | 7.86% | 14.88% | 11.82% | 9.87% | 10.32% |
Drawdowns
GXXIX vs. STK - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GXXIX drawdown since its inception was -33.65%, smaller than the maximum STK drawdown of -41.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GXXIX and STK.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| GXXIX | STK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -33.65% | -41.74% | +8.09% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.78% | -13.59% | +1.81% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -33.65% | -36.27% | +2.62% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -33.65% | -41.74% | +8.09% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -10.87% | -4.93% | -5.94% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.20% | -7.47% | +1.27% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.14% | 3.69% | -0.55% |
Volatility
GXXIX vs. STK - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for abrdn U.S. Sustainable Leaders Fund (GXXIX) is 5.20%, while Columbia Seligman Premium Technology Growth Closed Fund (STK) has a volatility of 10.03%. This indicates that GXXIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than STK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| GXXIX | STK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.20% | 10.03% | -4.83% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.27% | 18.08% | -8.81% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.73% | 25.75% | -9.02% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 27.78% | 24.85% | +2.93% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.72% | 25.92% | -2.20% |