GXUS vs. IFLO
GXUS (Goldman Sachs MarketBeta(R) Total International Equity ETF) and IFLO (VictoryShares International Free Cash Flow ETF) are both Foreign Large Cap Equities funds. Over the past year, GXUS returned 26.68% vs 32.28% for IFLO. A 0.79 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. GXUS charges 0.18%/yr vs 0.56%/yr for IFLO.
Performance
GXUS vs. IFLO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GXUS achieves a 14.03% return, which is significantly lower than IFLO's 16.93% return.
GXUS
- 1D
- 0.85%
- 1M
- -0.55%
- YTD
- 14.03%
- 6M
- 13.79%
- 1Y
- 26.68%
- 3Y*
- 18.47%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
IFLO
- 1D
- 0.43%
- 1M
- -1.62%
- YTD
- 16.93%
- 6M
- 16.46%
- 1Y
- 32.28%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
GXUS vs. IFLO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
GXUS Goldman Sachs MarketBeta(R) Total International Equity ETF | 14.03% | 11.09% |
IFLO VictoryShares International Free Cash Flow ETF | 16.93% | 13.12% |
Correlation
The correlation between GXUS and IFLO is 0.79, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 26, 2025 | 0.79 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GXUS vs. IFLO — Risk / Return Rank
GXUS
IFLO
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
GXUS vs. IFLO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs MarketBeta(R) Total International Equity ETF (GXUS) and VictoryShares International Free Cash Flow ETF (IFLO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| GXUS | IFLO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.28 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.34 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.66 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
GXUS vs. IFLO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GXUS drawdown since its inception was -13.90%, which is greater than IFLO's maximum drawdown of -6.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GXUS and IFLO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GXUS | IFLO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -13.90% | -6.44% | -7.46% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.46% | -6.44% | -5.02% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -13.90% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.35% | -3.37% | +1.02% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.78% | -1.25% | -1.53% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.09% | — | — |
Volatility
GXUS vs. IFLO - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GXUS | IFLO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.97% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.65% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.40% | 14.75% | +2.65% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.53% | 14.75% | +0.78% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.53% | 14.75% | +0.78% |
GXUS vs. IFLO - Expense Ratio Comparison
GXUS has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is lower than IFLO's 0.56% expense ratio.
Dividends
GXUS vs. IFLO - Dividend Comparison
GXUS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.30%, more than IFLO's 1.51% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
GXUS Goldman Sachs MarketBeta(R) Total International Equity ETF | 2.30% | 2.66% | 2.87% | 1.28% |
IFLO VictoryShares International Free Cash Flow ETF | 1.51% | 0.73% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GXUS and IFLO have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On 1-year performance, IFLO leads with 32.28% vs 26.68% for GXUS. On fees, GXUS is cheaper at 0.18% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, IFLO has performed better with a 32.28% return vs 26.68%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
GXUS is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.56% for IFLO.
GXUS has the higher dividend yield at 2.30%, compared with 1.51% for IFLO.
They also come from different issuers: Goldman Sachs and VictoryShares. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for GXUS and 0.56% for IFLO.
Find the right allocation for GXUS and IFLO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer