GXUS vs. GBIL
GXUS (Goldman Sachs MarketBeta(R) Total International Equity ETF) and GBIL (Goldman Sachs Access Treasury 0-1 Year ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - GXUS is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund tracking the Solactive GBS Global Markets ex United States Large & Mid Cap Index - Benchmark TR Net, while GBIL is a Government Bonds fund tracking the FTSE US Treasury 0-1 Year Composite Select Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, GXUS returned 18.76%/yr vs 4.55%/yr for GBIL. Their 0.04 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. GXUS charges 0.18%/yr vs 0.12%/yr for GBIL.
Performance
GXUS vs. GBIL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GXUS achieves a 16.78% return, which is significantly higher than GBIL's 2.03% return.
GXUS
- 1D
- 1.82%
- 1M
- 2.94%
- 6M
- 9.60%
- YTD
- 16.78%
- 1Y
- 29.85%
- 3Y*
- 18.76%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 18.42%
GBIL
- 1D
- 0.03%
- 1M
- 0.31%
- 6M
- 1.74%
- YTD
- 2.03%
- 1Y
- 3.76%
- 3Y*
- 4.55%
- 5Y*
- 3.44%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 2.30%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $54.21M | $51.93M | $68.82M | |
| $81.19K | $314.40K | $132.80K |
GXUS vs. GBIL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
GXUS Goldman Sachs MarketBeta(R) Total International Equity ETF | 16.78% | 31.47% | 4.61% | 6.23% |
GBIL Goldman Sachs Access Treasury 0-1 Year ETF | 2.03% | 4.12% | 5.24% | 3.06% |
Correlation
The correlation between GXUS and GBIL is 0.05, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.05 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.05 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 7, 2023 | 0.04 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GXUS vs. GBIL — Risk / Return Rank
GXUS
GBIL
GXUS vs. GBIL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs MarketBeta(R) Total International Equity ETF (GXUS) and Goldman Sachs Access Treasury 0-1 Year ETF (GBIL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| GXUS | GBIL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -16.41 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -148.73 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.32 | 93.38 | -92.05 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.62 | 188.95 | -186.33 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.79 | 2,263.03 | -2,253.24 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
GXUS vs. GBIL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GXUS drawdown since its inception was -13.90%, which is greater than GBIL's maximum drawdown of -0.76%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GXUS and GBIL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GXUS | GBIL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -13.90% | -0.76% | -13.14% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.46% | -0.02% | -11.44% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -13.90% | -0.76% | -13.14% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -0.76% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.78% | -0.04% | -2.74% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.06% | 0.00% | +3.06% |
Volatility
GXUS vs. GBIL - Volatility Comparison
Goldman Sachs MarketBeta(R) Total International Equity ETF (GXUS) has a higher volatility of 5.19% compared to Goldman Sachs Access Treasury 0-1 Year ETF (GBIL) at 0.06%. This indicates that GXUS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GBIL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GXUS | GBIL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.19% | 0.06% | +5.13% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.23% | 0.14% | +15.09% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.15% | 0.21% | +16.94% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.59% | 0.58% | +15.01% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.59% | 0.47% | +15.12% |
GXUS vs. GBIL - Expense Ratio Comparison
GXUS has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is higher than GBIL's 0.12% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
GXUS vs. GBIL - Dividend Comparison
GXUS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.25%, less than GBIL's 3.67% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GBIL Goldman Sachs Access Treasury 0-1 Year ETF | 3.67% | 4.02% | 4.93% | 4.77% | 1.37% | 0.00% | 0.81% | 2.20% | 1.70% | 0.74% | 0.11% |
GXUS Goldman Sachs MarketBeta(R) Total International Equity ETF | 2.25% | 2.66% | 2.87% | 1.28% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GXUS and GBIL have a correlation of 0.05, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GXUS has higher volatility (5.19%) compared to GBIL (0.06%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GXUS dropped -13.90% vs GBIL's -0.76%.
On 3-year performance, GXUS leads with 18.76% vs 4.55% for GBIL. On fees, GBIL is cheaper at 0.12% per year. On volatility, GBIL has been the lower-risk option at 0.06%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, GXUS has performed better with a 18.76% return vs 4.55%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
GBIL is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.18% for GXUS.
GBIL has the higher dividend yield at 3.67%, compared with 2.25% for GXUS.
GXUS is categorized as Foreign Large Cap Equities, while GBIL is Government Bonds. GXUS tracks Solactive GBS Global Markets ex United States Large & Mid Cap Index - Benchmark TR Net, while GBIL tracks FTSE US Treasury 0-1 Year Composite Select Index. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for GXUS and 0.12% for GBIL.
GBIL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (18.16 vs 1.75), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GXUS and GBIL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer