GXUS vs. CIL
GXUS (Goldman Sachs MarketBeta(R) Total International Equity ETF) and CIL (VictoryShares International Volatility Wtd ETF) are both Foreign Large Cap Equities funds - GXUS tracks the Solactive GBS Global Markets ex United States Large & Mid Cap Index - Benchmark TR Net while CIL tracks the Nasdaq Victory International 500 Volatility Weighted Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, GXUS returned 31.75% vs 17.37% for CIL. A 0.79 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. GXUS charges 0.18%/yr vs 0.45%/yr for CIL.
Performance
GXUS vs. CIL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GXUS achieves a 14.90% return, which is significantly higher than CIL's 5.44% return.
GXUS
- 1D
- -0.98%
- 1M
- 5.14%
- YTD
- 14.90%
- 6M
- 17.66%
- 1Y
- 31.75%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CIL
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.00%
- YTD
- 5.44%
- 6M
- 7.94%
- 1Y
- 17.37%
- 3Y*
- 15.59%
- 5Y*
- 7.45%
- 10Y*
- 8.21%
GXUS vs. CIL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
GXUS Goldman Sachs MarketBeta(R) Total International Equity ETF | 14.90% | 31.47% | 4.61% | 6.23% |
CIL VictoryShares International Volatility Wtd ETF | 5.44% | 32.99% | 3.76% | 6.73% |
Correlation
The correlation between GXUS and CIL is 0.54, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.54 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 8, 2023 | 0.79 |
Over the past year, the correlation between GXUS and CIL has dropped to 0.54 - well below their long-term average of 0.79, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GXUS vs. CIL — Risk / Return Rank
GXUS
CIL
GXUS vs. CIL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs MarketBeta(R) Total International Equity ETF (GXUS) and VictoryShares International Volatility Wtd ETF (CIL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GXUS | CIL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.28 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.55 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.35 | 1.49 | -0.14 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.78 | 3.95 | -1.17 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.51 | 16.75 | -6.24 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GXUS | CIL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.95 | 2.24 | -0.28 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.46 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.48 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.25 | 0.43 | +0.82 |
Drawdowns
GXUS vs. CIL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GXUS drawdown since its inception was -13.90%, smaller than the maximum CIL drawdown of -36.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GXUS and CIL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GXUS | CIL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -13.90% | -36.27% | +22.37% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.46% | -4.60% | -6.86% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -11.96% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -29.89% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -36.27% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.98% | -0.58% | -0.40% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.80% | -6.56% | +3.76% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.03% | 1.07% | +1.96% |
Volatility
GXUS vs. CIL - Volatility Comparison
Goldman Sachs MarketBeta(R) Total International Equity ETF (GXUS) has a higher volatility of 5.42% compared to VictoryShares International Volatility Wtd ETF (CIL) at 0.00%. This indicates that GXUS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CIL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GXUS | CIL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.42% | 0.00% | +5.42% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.11% | 4.23% | +8.88% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.33% | 8.19% | +8.14% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.22% | 16.49% | -1.27% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.22% | 17.17% | -1.95% |
GXUS vs. CIL - Expense Ratio Comparison
GXUS has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is lower than CIL's 0.45% expense ratio.
Dividends
GXUS vs. CIL - Dividend Comparison
GXUS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.19%, more than CIL's 1.67% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CIL VictoryShares International Volatility Wtd ETF | 1.67% | 2.70% | 3.46% | 2.91% | 2.41% | 3.04% | 1.73% | 2.69% | 2.85% | 2.17% | 2.34% | 0.43% |
GXUS Goldman Sachs MarketBeta(R) Total International Equity ETF | 2.19% | 2.66% | 2.87% | 1.28% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GXUS and CIL have a correlation of 0.54, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GXUS has higher volatility (5.42%) compared to CIL (0.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GXUS dropped -13.90% vs CIL's -36.27%.
On 1-year performance, GXUS leads with 31.75% vs 17.37% for CIL. On fees, GXUS is cheaper at 0.18% per year. On volatility, CIL has been the lower-risk option at 0.00%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, GXUS has performed better with a 31.75% return vs 17.37%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
GXUS is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for CIL.
GXUS has the higher dividend yield at 2.19%, compared with 1.67% for CIL.
GXUS tracks Solactive GBS Global Markets ex United States Large & Mid Cap Index - Benchmark TR Net, while CIL tracks Nasdaq Victory International 500 Volatility Weighted Index. They also come from different issuers: Goldman Sachs and Crestview. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for GXUS and 0.45% for CIL.
CIL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.24 vs 1.95), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GXUS and CIL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer