PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GXRP vs. GLNK
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GXRP vs. GLNK - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Grayscale XRP Trust ETF (GXRP) and Grayscale Chainlink Trust ETF (GLNK). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with GXRP having a -35.87% return and GLNK slightly higher at -34.28%.


GXRP

1D
-2.33%
1M
-17.12%
YTD
-35.87%
6M
-44.38%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

GLNK

1D
-1.51%
1M
-17.03%
YTD
-34.28%
6M
-43.95%
1Y
-60.98%
3Y*
-14.49%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GXRP vs. GLNK - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
GXRP
Grayscale XRP Trust ETF
-35.87%-18.76%
GLNK
Grayscale Chainlink Trust ETF
-34.28%-33.85%

Correlation

The correlation between GXRP and GLNK is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 25, 2025

0.91

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GXRP vs. GLNK — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GXRP

GLNK
GLNK Risk / Return Rank: 55
Overall Rank
GLNK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GLNK Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
Sortino Ratio Rank
GLNK Omega Ratio Rank: 55
Omega Ratio Rank
GLNK Calmar Ratio Rank: 33
Calmar Ratio Rank
GLNK Martin Ratio Rank: 55
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GXRP vs. GLNK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Grayscale XRP Trust ETF (GXRP) and Grayscale Chainlink Trust ETF (GLNK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

GXRP vs. GLNK - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GXRPGLNKDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.56

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-1.00

-0.01

-0.99

Drawdowns

GXRP vs. GLNK - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GXRP drawdown since its inception was -49.34%, smaller than the maximum GLNK drawdown of -95.82%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GXRP and GLNK.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GXRPGLNKDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-49.34%

-95.82%

+46.48%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-88.29%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-95.82%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-49.34%

-95.78%

+46.44%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-30.29%

-55.74%

+25.45%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

66.91%

Volatility

GXRP vs. GLNK - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GXRPGLNKDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

14.84%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

46.80%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

71.66%

109.05%

-37.39%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

71.66%

164.79%

-93.13%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

71.66%

164.79%

-93.13%

GXRP vs. GLNK - Expense Ratio Comparison

GXRP has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than GLNK's 2.50% expense ratio.


Dividends

GXRP vs. GLNK - Dividend Comparison

Neither GXRP nor GLNK has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.91, GXRP and GLNK move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

On fees, GXRP is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

GXRP is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 2.50% for GLNK.

GXRP and GLNK have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

GXRP tracks CoinDesk XRP Reference Rate Index, while GLNK tracks Chainlink (LINK). Their fees differ too: 0.35% for GXRP and 2.50% for GLNK.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GXRP and GLNK

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer