PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GXPE vs. EINC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GXPE vs. EINC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X PureCap MSCI Energy ETF (GXPE) and VanEck Energy Income ETF (EINC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GXPE achieves a 30.84% return, which is significantly higher than EINC's 26.33% return.


GXPE

1D
-0.26%
1M
-1.57%
YTD
30.84%
6M
28.66%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

EINC

1D
1.28%
1M
0.04%
YTD
26.33%
6M
24.35%
1Y
29.22%
3Y*
29.81%
5Y*
21.04%
10Y*
11.62%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GXPE vs. EINC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
GXPE
Global X PureCap MSCI Energy ETF
30.84%4.62%
EINC
VanEck Energy Income ETF
26.33%3.70%

Correlation

The correlation between GXPE and EINC is 0.65, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 24, 2025

0.65

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GXPE vs. EINC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GXPE

EINC
EINC Risk / Return Rank: 6262
Overall Rank
EINC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6161
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EINC Sortino Ratio Rank: 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
EINC Omega Ratio Rank: 5858
Omega Ratio Rank
EINC Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
EINC Martin Ratio Rank: 5959
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GXPE vs. EINC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X PureCap MSCI Energy ETF (GXPE) and VanEck Energy Income ETF (EINC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

GXPE vs. EINC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GXPEEINCDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.00

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.08

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.46

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

2.15

0.04

+2.11

Drawdowns

GXPE vs. EINC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GXPE drawdown since its inception was -12.37%, smaller than the maximum EINC drawdown of -87.55%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GXPE and EINC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GXPEEINCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-12.37%

-87.55%

+75.18%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.89%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.01%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.87%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-68.85%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.12%

-4.23%

-2.89%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.23%

-44.28%

+41.05%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.85%

Volatility

GXPE vs. EINC - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GXPEEINCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.52%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.55%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.38%

14.74%

+5.64%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.38%

19.58%

+0.80%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.38%

25.43%

-5.05%

GXPE vs. EINC - Expense Ratio Comparison

GXPE has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than EINC's 0.45% expense ratio.


Dividends

GXPE vs. EINC - Dividend Comparison

GXPE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.92%, less than EINC's 3.50% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EINC
VanEck Energy Income ETF
3.50%4.51%3.33%3.77%2.89%6.03%6.69%9.66%11.31%8.53%9.71%28.53%
GXPE
Global X PureCap MSCI Energy ETF
0.92%1.20%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


GXPE and EINC have a correlation of 0.65, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, GXPE is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

GXPE is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for EINC.

EINC has the higher dividend yield at 3.50%, compared with 0.92% for GXPE.

GXPE tracks MSCI USA Energy PureCap Index, while EINC tracks MVIS North America Energy Infrastructure Index. They also come from different issuers: Global X and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for GXPE and 0.45% for EINC.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GXPE and EINC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer