GXPD vs. RSPD
GXPD (Global X PureCap MSCI Consumer Discretionary ETF) and RSPD (Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Consumer Discretionary ETF) are both Consumer Discretionary Equities funds - GXPD tracks the MSCI USA Consumer Discretionary PureCap Index while RSPD tracks the S&P 500 Equal Weighted / Consumer Discretionary -SEC. Both are passively managed. A 0.69 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. GXPD charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.40%/yr for RSPD.
Performance
GXPD vs. RSPD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GXPD achieves a -4.42% return, which is significantly lower than RSPD's -3.06% return.
GXPD
- 1D
- -0.80%
- 1M
- -6.40%
- YTD
- -4.42%
- 6M
- -6.65%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
RSPD
- 1D
- -0.22%
- 1M
- 2.26%
- YTD
- -3.06%
- 6M
- -4.33%
- 1Y
- 6.74%
- 3Y*
- 8.83%
- 5Y*
- 3.43%
- 10Y*
- 8.53%
GXPD vs. RSPD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
GXPD Global X PureCap MSCI Consumer Discretionary ETF | -4.42% | 5.36% |
RSPD Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Consumer Discretionary ETF | -3.06% | 1.75% |
Correlation
The correlation between GXPD and RSPD is 0.69, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 23, 2025 | 0.70 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GXPD vs. RSPD — Risk / Return Rank
GXPD
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
RSPD
GXPD vs. RSPD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X PureCap MSCI Consumer Discretionary ETF (GXPD) and Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Consumer Discretionary ETF (RSPD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| GXPD | RSPD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.07 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 0.49 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 1.17 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
GXPD vs. RSPD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GXPD drawdown since its inception was -16.61%, smaller than the maximum RSPD drawdown of -68.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GXPD and RSPD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GXPD | RSPD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -16.61% | -68.00% | +51.39% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -13.80% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -21.01% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -34.41% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -48.00% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -8.86% | -7.89% | -0.97% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.40% | -10.69% | +6.29% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 5.77% | — |
Volatility
GXPD vs. RSPD - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GXPD | RSPD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 5.66% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 14.03% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.38% | 18.54% | +1.84% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.38% | 22.17% | -1.79% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.38% | 23.12% | -2.74% |
GXPD vs. RSPD - Expense Ratio Comparison
GXPD has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than RSPD's 0.40% expense ratio.
Dividends
GXPD vs. RSPD - Dividend Comparison
GXPD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.20%, less than RSPD's 0.89% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GXPD Global X PureCap MSCI Consumer Discretionary ETF | 0.20% | 0.19% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
RSPD Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Consumer Discretionary ETF | 0.89% | 1.08% | 0.84% | 1.09% | 0.99% | 0.53% | 0.81% | 1.59% | 1.67% | 1.45% | 1.27% | 1.37% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GXPD and RSPD have a correlation of 0.69, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, GXPD is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
GXPD is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for RSPD.
RSPD has the higher dividend yield at 0.89%, compared with 0.20% for GXPD.
GXPD tracks MSCI USA Consumer Discretionary PureCap Index, while RSPD tracks S&P 500 Equal Weighted / Consumer Discretionary -SEC. They also come from different issuers: Global X and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for GXPD and 0.40% for RSPD.
Find the right allocation for GXPD and RSPD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer