GXPD vs. COPX
GXPD (Global X PureCap MSCI Consumer Discretionary ETF) and COPX (Global X Copper Miners ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - GXPD is a Consumer Discretionary Equities fund tracking the MSCI USA Consumer Discretionary PureCap Index, while COPX is a Materials fund tracking the Solactive Global Copper Miners Total Return Index. Both are passively managed. At a 0.40 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. GXPD charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for COPX.
Performance
GXPD vs. COPX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GXPD achieves a -0.87% return, which is significantly lower than COPX's 25.71% return.
GXPD
- 1D
- -0.87%
- 1M
- -2.13%
- YTD
- -0.87%
- 6M
- -0.98%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
COPX
- 1D
- -3.64%
- 1M
- 17.74%
- YTD
- 25.71%
- 6M
- 36.90%
- 1Y
- 120.82%
- 3Y*
- 37.36%
- 5Y*
- 19.87%
- 10Y*
- 21.95%
GXPD vs. COPX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
GXPD Global X PureCap MSCI Consumer Discretionary ETF | -0.87% | 5.44% |
COPX Global X Copper Miners ETF | 25.71% | 58.01% |
Correlation
The correlation between GXPD and COPX is 0.40, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 24, 2025 | 0.40 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GXPD vs. COPX — Risk / Return Rank
GXPD
COPX
GXPD vs. COPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X PureCap MSCI Consumer Discretionary ETF (GXPD) and Global X Copper Miners ETF (COPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GXPD | COPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 2.93 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.55 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.62 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.26 | 0.19 | +0.07 |
Drawdowns
GXPD vs. COPX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GXPD drawdown since its inception was -16.61%, smaller than the maximum COPX drawdown of -83.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GXPD and COPX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GXPD | COPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -16.61% | -83.16% | +66.55% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -27.82% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -39.72% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -42.12% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -65.41% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.48% | -5.69% | +0.21% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.27% | -39.30% | +35.03% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 8.66% | — |
Volatility
GXPD vs. COPX - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GXPD | COPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 15.38% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 35.68% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.01% | 41.41% | -21.40% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.01% | 36.51% | -16.50% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.01% | 35.55% | -15.54% |
GXPD vs. COPX - Expense Ratio Comparison
GXPD has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than COPX's 0.65% expense ratio.
Dividends
GXPD vs. COPX - Dividend Comparison
GXPD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.19%, less than COPX's 2.13% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
COPX Global X Copper Miners ETF | 2.13% | 2.68% | 1.80% | 2.39% | 3.14% | 1.48% | 1.30% | 1.37% | 2.59% | 1.57% | 0.60% | 1.20% |
GXPD Global X PureCap MSCI Consumer Discretionary ETF | 0.19% | 0.19% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GXPD and COPX have a correlation of 0.40, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, GXPD is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
GXPD is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for COPX.
COPX has the higher dividend yield at 2.13%, compared with 0.19% for GXPD.
GXPD is categorized as Consumer Discretionary Equities, while COPX is Materials. GXPD tracks MSCI USA Consumer Discretionary PureCap Index, while COPX tracks Solactive Global Copper Miners Total Return Index. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for GXPD and 0.65% for COPX.
Find the right allocation for GXPD and COPX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer