GXPC vs. AIQ
GXPC (Global X PureCap MSCI Communication Services ETF) and AIQ (Global X Artificial Intelligence & Technology ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - GXPC is a Communications Equities fund tracking the MSCI USA Communication Services PureCap Index, while AIQ is a Technology Equities fund tracking the Indxx Artificial Intelligence & Big Data Index. Both are passively managed. A 0.56 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. GXPC charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.68%/yr for AIQ.
Performance
GXPC vs. AIQ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GXPC achieves a 3.83% return, which is significantly lower than AIQ's 35.98% return.
GXPC
- 1D
- -0.34%
- 1M
- -4.59%
- YTD
- 3.83%
- 6M
- 3.68%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
AIQ
- 1D
- -1.40%
- 1M
- 21.10%
- YTD
- 35.98%
- 6M
- 36.15%
- 1Y
- 69.19%
- 3Y*
- 37.50%
- 5Y*
- 19.07%
- 10Y*
- —
GXPC vs. AIQ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
GXPC Global X PureCap MSCI Communication Services ETF | 3.83% | 19.31% |
AIQ Global X Artificial Intelligence & Technology ETF | 35.98% | 13.70% |
Correlation
The correlation between GXPC and AIQ is 0.56, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 24, 2025 | 0.56 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GXPC vs. AIQ — Risk / Return Rank
GXPC
AIQ
GXPC vs. AIQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X PureCap MSCI Communication Services ETF (GXPC) and Global X Artificial Intelligence & Technology ETF (AIQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GXPC | AIQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 3.02 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.76 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.43 | 0.84 | +0.59 |
Drawdowns
GXPC vs. AIQ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GXPC drawdown since its inception was -16.59%, smaller than the maximum AIQ drawdown of -44.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GXPC and AIQ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GXPC | AIQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -16.59% | -44.66% | +28.07% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -16.47% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -26.35% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -44.66% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.11% | -1.40% | -5.71% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.05% | -9.80% | +6.75% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 4.76% | — |
Volatility
GXPC vs. AIQ - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GXPC | AIQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 8.60% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 18.46% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.79% | 23.04% | -3.25% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.79% | 25.33% | -5.54% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.79% | 25.50% | -5.71% |
GXPC vs. AIQ - Expense Ratio Comparison
GXPC has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than AIQ's 0.68% expense ratio.
Dividends
GXPC vs. AIQ - Dividend Comparison
GXPC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.12%, less than AIQ's 0.14% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AIQ Global X Artificial Intelligence & Technology ETF | 0.14% | 0.18% | 0.14% | 0.16% | 0.56% | 0.15% | 0.50% | 0.51% | 0.51% |
GXPC Global X PureCap MSCI Communication Services ETF | 0.12% | 0.12% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GXPC and AIQ have a correlation of 0.56, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, GXPC is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
GXPC is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.68% for AIQ.
AIQ has the higher dividend yield at 0.14%, compared with 0.12% for GXPC.
GXPC is categorized as Communications Equities, while AIQ is Technology Equities. GXPC tracks MSCI USA Communication Services PureCap Index, while AIQ tracks Indxx Artificial Intelligence & Big Data Index. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for GXPC and 0.68% for AIQ.
Find the right allocation for GXPC and AIQ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer