PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GXLK.L vs. VUSA.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GXLK.L vs. VUSA.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in SPDR S&P US Technology Select Sector UCITS ETF (GXLK.L) and Vanguard S&P 500 UCITS ETF (VUSA.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GXLK.L achieves a 14.22% return, which is significantly higher than VUSA.L's 9.45% return. Over the past 10 years, GXLK.L has outperformed VUSA.L with an annualized return of 19.28%, while VUSA.L has yielded a comparatively lower 14.45% annualized return.


GXLK.L

1D
0.00%
1M
-6.86%
6M
17.22%
YTD
14.22%
1Y
27.54%
3Y*
22.12%
5Y*
10.69%
10Y*
19.28%
ALL TIME*
18.53%

VUSA.L

1D
0.36%
1M
-1.56%
6M
9.55%
YTD
9.45%
1Y
20.18%
3Y*
17.62%
5Y*
13.22%
10Y*
14.45%
ALL TIME*
16.14%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GXLK.L vs. VUSA.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
GXLK.L
SPDR S&P US Technology Select Sector UCITS ETF
14.22%15.88%24.73%48.31%-40.75%34.21%43.38%49.62%-1.81%33.90%
VUSA.L
Vanguard S&P 500 UCITS ETF
9.45%9.39%27.33%19.82%-9.02%30.97%13.65%26.53%-0.10%10.72%

Correlation

The correlation between GXLK.L and VUSA.L is 0.83, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.83

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.85

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.79

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.60

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 7, 2015

0.57

Over the past year, GXLK.L and VUSA.L have become more correlated (0.83) than their long-term average of 0.57, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GXLK.L vs. VUSA.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GXLK.L
GXLK.L Risk / Return Rank: 4444
Overall Rank
GXLK.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4949
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GXLK.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 4747
Sortino Ratio Rank
GXLK.L Omega Ratio Rank: 4646
Omega Ratio Rank
GXLK.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 4343
Calmar Ratio Rank
GXLK.L Martin Ratio Rank: 3535
Martin Ratio Rank

VUSA.L
VUSA.L Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
VUSA.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7777
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VUSA.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
VUSA.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
VUSA.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
VUSA.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GXLK.L vs. VUSA.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P US Technology Select Sector UCITS ETF (GXLK.L) and Vanguard S&P 500 UCITS ETF (VUSA.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


GXLK.LVUSA.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.56

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.74

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.23

1.34

-0.11

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.66

2.83

-1.17

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.95

10.12

-6.18

GXLK.L vs. VUSA.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GXLK.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.29, which is lower than the VUSA.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.85. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GXLK.L and VUSA.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

GXLK.L vs. VUSA.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GXLK.L drawdown since its inception was -43.09%, which is greater than VUSA.L's maximum drawdown of -25.48%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GXLK.L and VUSA.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GXLK.LVUSA.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-43.09%

-25.48%

-17.61%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-16.67%

-7.10%

-9.57%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-28.24%

-20.93%

-7.31%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-43.09%

-20.93%

-22.16%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-43.09%

-25.48%

-17.61%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-9.98%

-1.56%

-8.42%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.58%

-3.14%

-5.44%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

7.00%

1.99%

+5.01%

Volatility

GXLK.L vs. VUSA.L - Volatility Comparison

SPDR S&P US Technology Select Sector UCITS ETF (GXLK.L) has a higher volatility of 7.47% compared to Vanguard S&P 500 UCITS ETF (VUSA.L) at 2.97%. This indicates that GXLK.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VUSA.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GXLK.LVUSA.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.47%

2.97%

+4.50%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.44%

7.59%

+8.85%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

21.55%

10.90%

+10.65%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

24.58%

14.35%

+10.23%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.33%

15.52%

+8.81%

GXLK.L vs. VUSA.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

GXLK.L has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is higher than VUSA.L's 0.07% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

GXLK.L vs. VUSA.L - Dividend Comparison

GXLK.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while VUSA.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.89%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GXLK.L
SPDR S&P US Technology Select Sector UCITS ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
VUSA.L
Vanguard S&P 500 UCITS ETF
0.89%0.95%1.00%1.24%1.41%1.04%1.44%1.50%1.72%1.61%1.58%1.74%

Frequently Asked Questions


GXLK.L and VUSA.L have a correlation of 0.83, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, VUSA.L is cheaper at 0.07% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

VUSA.L is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for GXLK.L.

GXLK.L is categorized as Technology Equities, while VUSA.L is S&P 500. GXLK.L tracks MSCI World/Information Tech NR USD, while VUSA.L tracks S&P 500 Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for GXLK.L and 0.07% for VUSA.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GXLK.L and VUSA.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer