PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GXLK.L vs. LYPG.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GXLK.L vs. LYPG.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in SPDR S&P US Technology Select Sector UCITS ETF (GXLK.L) and Amundi MSCI World Information Technology UCITS ETF EUR Acc (LYPG.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

GXLK.L is traded in GBP, while LYPG.DE is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the LYPG.DE values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GXLK.L achieves a 14.22% return, which is significantly lower than LYPG.DE's 16.21% return. Over the past 10 years, GXLK.L has underperformed LYPG.DE with an annualized return of 19.28%, while LYPG.DE has yielded a comparatively higher 22.50% annualized return.


GXLK.L

1D
0.00%
1M
-6.86%
6M
17.22%
YTD
14.22%
1Y
27.54%
3Y*
22.12%
5Y*
10.69%
10Y*
19.28%
ALL TIME*
18.53%

LYPG.DE

1D
1.17%
1M
-6.09%
6M
18.75%
YTD
16.21%
1Y
29.00%
3Y*
25.39%
5Y*
18.12%
10Y*
22.50%
ALL TIME*
20.38%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GXLK.L vs. LYPG.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
GXLK.L
SPDR S&P US Technology Select Sector UCITS ETF
14.22%15.88%24.73%48.31%-40.75%34.21%43.38%49.62%-1.81%33.90%
LYPG.DE
Amundi MSCI World Information Technology UCITS ETF EUR Acc
16.21%14.88%34.88%46.22%-24.39%31.72%38.04%43.33%2.03%25.81%

Correlation

The correlation between GXLK.L and LYPG.DE is 0.95 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.95

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.95

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.89

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.71

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 7, 2015

0.68

Over the past year, GXLK.L and LYPG.DE have become more correlated (0.95) than their long-term average of 0.68, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GXLK.L vs. LYPG.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GXLK.L
GXLK.L Risk / Return Rank: 4444
Overall Rank
GXLK.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4949
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GXLK.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 4747
Sortino Ratio Rank
GXLK.L Omega Ratio Rank: 4646
Omega Ratio Rank
GXLK.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 4343
Calmar Ratio Rank
GXLK.L Martin Ratio Rank: 3535
Martin Ratio Rank

LYPG.DE
LYPG.DE Risk / Return Rank: 5151
Overall Rank
LYPG.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5757
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LYPG.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 5353
Sortino Ratio Rank
LYPG.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 5151
Omega Ratio Rank
LYPG.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 5353
Calmar Ratio Rank
LYPG.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 4242
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GXLK.L vs. LYPG.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P US Technology Select Sector UCITS ETF (GXLK.L) and Amundi MSCI World Information Technology UCITS ETF EUR Acc (LYPG.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


GXLK.LLYPG.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.05

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.06

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.23

1.23

0.00

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.66

1.76

-0.10

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.95

4.27

-0.32

GXLK.L vs. LYPG.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GXLK.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.29, which is comparable to the LYPG.DE Sharpe Ratio of 1.33. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GXLK.L and LYPG.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

GXLK.L vs. LYPG.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GXLK.L drawdown since its inception was -43.09%, which is greater than LYPG.DE's maximum drawdown of -28.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GXLK.L and LYPG.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GXLK.LLYPG.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-43.09%

-28.29%

-14.80%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-16.67%

-16.37%

-0.30%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-28.24%

-28.29%

+0.05%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-43.09%

-28.29%

-14.80%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-43.09%

-28.29%

-14.80%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-9.98%

-8.65%

-1.33%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.58%

-5.12%

-3.46%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

7.00%

6.78%

+0.22%

Volatility

GXLK.L vs. LYPG.DE - Volatility Comparison

SPDR S&P US Technology Select Sector UCITS ETF (GXLK.L) and Amundi MSCI World Information Technology UCITS ETF EUR Acc (LYPG.DE) have volatilities of 7.47% and 7.49%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GXLK.LLYPG.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.47%

7.49%

-0.02%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.44%

16.67%

-0.23%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

21.55%

21.69%

-0.14%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

24.58%

22.42%

+2.16%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.33%

21.35%

+2.98%

GXLK.L vs. LYPG.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

GXLK.L has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than LYPG.DE's 0.30% expense ratio.


Dividends

GXLK.L vs. LYPG.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither GXLK.L nor LYPG.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.95, GXLK.L and LYPG.DE move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

On fees, GXLK.L is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

GXLK.L is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for LYPG.DE.

GXLK.L tracks MSCI World/Information Tech NR USD, while LYPG.DE tracks MSCI World Information Technology. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Amundi. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for GXLK.L and 0.30% for LYPG.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GXLK.L and LYPG.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer