PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GXLK.L vs. 6AQQ.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GXLK.L vs. 6AQQ.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in SPDR S&P US Technology Select Sector UCITS ETF (GXLK.L) and Amundi Nasdaq 100 UCITS ETF EUR (6AQQ.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

GXLK.L is traded in GBP, while 6AQQ.DE is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the 6AQQ.DE values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with GXLK.L having a 14.22% return and 6AQQ.DE slightly lower at 13.71%. Over the past 10 years, GXLK.L has underperformed 6AQQ.DE with an annualized return of 19.28%, while 6AQQ.DE has yielded a comparatively higher 20.42% annualized return.


GXLK.L

1D
0.00%
1M
-6.86%
6M
17.22%
YTD
14.22%
1Y
27.54%
3Y*
22.12%
5Y*
10.69%
10Y*
19.28%
ALL TIME*
18.53%

6AQQ.DE

1D
1.12%
1M
-6.33%
6M
14.73%
YTD
13.71%
1Y
25.73%
3Y*
21.77%
5Y*
15.38%
10Y*
20.42%
ALL TIME*
20.20%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GXLK.L vs. 6AQQ.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
GXLK.L
SPDR S&P US Technology Select Sector UCITS ETF
14.22%15.88%24.73%48.31%-40.75%34.21%43.38%49.62%-1.81%33.90%
6AQQ.DE
Amundi Nasdaq 100 UCITS ETF EUR
13.71%12.65%27.94%48.51%-26.12%29.77%42.33%35.47%4.69%20.85%

Correlation

The correlation between GXLK.L and 6AQQ.DE is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.90

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.91

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.84

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.67

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 7, 2015

0.63

Over the past year, GXLK.L and 6AQQ.DE have become more correlated (0.90) than their long-term average of 0.63, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GXLK.L vs. 6AQQ.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GXLK.L
GXLK.L Risk / Return Rank: 4444
Overall Rank
GXLK.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4949
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GXLK.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 4747
Sortino Ratio Rank
GXLK.L Omega Ratio Rank: 4646
Omega Ratio Rank
GXLK.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 4343
Calmar Ratio Rank
GXLK.L Martin Ratio Rank: 3535
Martin Ratio Rank

6AQQ.DE
6AQQ.DE Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
6AQQ.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
6AQQ.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
6AQQ.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
6AQQ.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
6AQQ.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 6262
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GXLK.L vs. 6AQQ.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P US Technology Select Sector UCITS ETF (GXLK.L) and Amundi Nasdaq 100 UCITS ETF EUR (6AQQ.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


GXLK.L6AQQ.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.26

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.35

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.23

1.27

-0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.66

2.32

-0.66

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.95

6.37

-2.42

GXLK.L vs. 6AQQ.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GXLK.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.29, which is comparable to the 6AQQ.DE Sharpe Ratio of 1.55. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GXLK.L and 6AQQ.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

GXLK.L vs. 6AQQ.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GXLK.L drawdown since its inception was -43.09%, which is greater than 6AQQ.DE's maximum drawdown of -27.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GXLK.L and 6AQQ.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GXLK.L6AQQ.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-43.09%

-27.56%

-15.53%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-16.67%

-11.02%

-5.65%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-28.24%

-25.16%

-3.08%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-43.09%

-27.56%

-15.53%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-43.09%

-27.56%

-15.53%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-9.98%

-6.33%

-3.65%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.58%

-4.53%

-4.05%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

7.00%

4.03%

+2.97%

Volatility

GXLK.L vs. 6AQQ.DE - Volatility Comparison

SPDR S&P US Technology Select Sector UCITS ETF (GXLK.L) has a higher volatility of 7.47% compared to Amundi Nasdaq 100 UCITS ETF EUR (6AQQ.DE) at 6.05%. This indicates that GXLK.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than 6AQQ.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GXLK.L6AQQ.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.47%

6.05%

+1.42%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.44%

12.46%

+3.98%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

21.55%

16.61%

+4.94%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

24.58%

19.65%

+4.93%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.33%

19.59%

+4.74%

GXLK.L vs. 6AQQ.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

GXLK.L has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than 6AQQ.DE's 0.23% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

GXLK.L vs. 6AQQ.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither GXLK.L nor 6AQQ.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


GXLK.L and 6AQQ.DE have a correlation of 0.90, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, GXLK.L is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

GXLK.L is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.23% for 6AQQ.DE.

GXLK.L is categorized as Technology Equities, while 6AQQ.DE is Nasdaq-100. GXLK.L tracks MSCI World/Information Tech NR USD, while 6AQQ.DE tracks Nasdaq 100®. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Amundi. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for GXLK.L and 0.23% for 6AQQ.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GXLK.L and 6AQQ.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer