PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GXLC.L vs. XLCS.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GXLC.L vs. XLCS.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in SPDR® S&P® U.S. Communication Services Select Sector UCITS ETF (GXLC.L) and Invesco Communications S&P US Select Sector UCITS ETF Acc (XLCS.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

GXLC.L is traded in GBP, while XLCS.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the XLCS.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GXLC.L achieves a 2.07% return, which is significantly higher than XLCS.L's -1.45% return.


GXLC.L

1D
1.55%
1M
-2.03%
YTD
2.07%
6M
1.19%
1Y
22.13%
3Y*
22.19%
5Y*
11.50%
10Y*

XLCS.L

1D
1.24%
1M
-2.89%
YTD
-1.45%
6M
-3.25%
1Y
6.42%
3Y*
19.70%
5Y*
9.25%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GXLC.L vs. XLCS.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
GXLC.L
SPDR® S&P® U.S. Communication Services Select Sector UCITS ETF
2.07%19.01%33.60%45.06%-29.78%18.90%22.83%25.39%-8.88%
XLCS.L
Invesco Communications S&P US Select Sector UCITS ETF Acc
-1.45%10.64%40.10%43.27%-32.02%14.85%17.89%19.97%-2.53%

Correlation

The correlation between GXLC.L and XLCS.L is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.91

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.90

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.88

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 19, 2018

0.83

The correlation between GXLC.L and XLCS.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.83 to 0.91 - a consistent structural relationship.

GXLC.L vs. XLCS.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
GXLC.L
XLCS.L

Communication Services

100.0%
100.0%

Basic Materials

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

-

Financial Services

-

-

Healthcare

-

-

Industrials

-

-

Real Estate

-

-

Technology

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Communication Services

GXLC.L
100.0%
XLCS.L
100.0%

Basic Materials

GXLC.L

-

XLCS.L

-

Consumer Cyclical

GXLC.L

-

XLCS.L

-

Consumer Defensive

GXLC.L

-

XLCS.L

-

Energy

GXLC.L

-

XLCS.L

-

Financial Services

GXLC.L

-

XLCS.L

-

Healthcare

GXLC.L

-

XLCS.L

-

Industrials

GXLC.L

-

XLCS.L

-

Real Estate

GXLC.L

-

XLCS.L

-

Technology

GXLC.L

-

XLCS.L

-

Utilities

GXLC.L

-

XLCS.L

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GXLC.L vs. XLCS.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GXLC.L
GXLC.L Risk / Return Rank: 5050
Overall Rank
GXLC.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4848
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GXLC.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 5050
Sortino Ratio Rank
GXLC.L Omega Ratio Rank: 4444
Omega Ratio Rank
GXLC.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 5252
Calmar Ratio Rank
GXLC.L Martin Ratio Rank: 5454
Martin Ratio Rank

XLCS.L
XLCS.L Risk / Return Rank: 1717
Overall Rank
XLCS.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1717
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XLCS.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 1616
Sortino Ratio Rank
XLCS.L Omega Ratio Rank: 1515
Omega Ratio Rank
XLCS.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 1717
Calmar Ratio Rank
XLCS.L Martin Ratio Rank: 1717
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GXLC.L vs. XLCS.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR® S&P® U.S. Communication Services Select Sector UCITS ETF (GXLC.L) and Invesco Communications S&P US Select Sector UCITS ETF Acc (XLCS.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GXLC.LXLCS.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.13

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.57

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

1.09

+0.18

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.55

0.93

+1.62

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.15

2.19

+6.96

GXLC.L vs. XLCS.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GXLC.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.65, which is higher than the XLCS.L Sharpe Ratio of 0.53. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GXLC.L and XLCS.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GXLC.LXLCS.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.65

0.53

+1.13

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.64

0.51

+0.13

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.69

0.67

+0.02

Drawdowns

GXLC.L vs. XLCS.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GXLC.L drawdown since its inception was -35.84%, smaller than the maximum XLCS.L drawdown of -38.82%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GXLC.L and XLCS.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GXLC.LXLCS.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-35.84%

-38.82%

+2.98%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.66%

-7.84%

-0.82%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.45%

-19.17%

+0.72%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-35.84%

-38.82%

+2.98%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.54%

-5.38%

+0.84%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.72%

-8.27%

+0.55%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.41%

3.34%

-0.93%

Volatility

GXLC.L vs. XLCS.L - Volatility Comparison

SPDR® S&P® U.S. Communication Services Select Sector UCITS ETF (GXLC.L) and Invesco Communications S&P US Select Sector UCITS ETF Acc (XLCS.L) have volatilities of 4.36% and 4.46%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GXLC.LXLCS.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.36%

4.46%

-0.10%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.64%

10.43%

-0.79%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.32%

13.82%

-0.50%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.92%

19.47%

-1.55%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.04%

20.34%

-1.30%

GXLC.L vs. XLCS.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

GXLC.L has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is higher than XLCS.L's 0.14% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

GXLC.L vs. XLCS.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither GXLC.L nor XLCS.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.91, GXLC.L and XLCS.L move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

On fees, XLCS.L is cheaper at 0.14% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XLCS.L is cheaper with a 0.14% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for GXLC.L.

GXLC.L tracks MSCI World/Comm Services NR USD, while XLCS.L tracks S&P® Select Sector Capped 20% Communications Services Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for GXLC.L and 0.14% for XLCS.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GXLC.L and XLCS.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer