GXIG vs. URA
GXIG (Global X Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF) and URA (Global X Uranium ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - GXIG is a Corporate Bonds fund actively managed by Global X, while URA is a Commodity Producers Equities fund tracking the Solactive Global Uranium & Nuclear Components Index. GXIG is actively managed, while URA is passively managed. At a 0.18 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. GXIG charges 0.14%/yr vs 0.69%/yr for URA.
Performance
GXIG vs. URA - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GXIG achieves a 0.52% return, which is significantly lower than URA's 25.02% return.
GXIG
- 1D
- -0.02%
- 1M
- 0.47%
- YTD
- 0.52%
- 6M
- 0.46%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
URA
- 1D
- 5.70%
- 1M
- -4.33%
- YTD
- 25.02%
- 6M
- 23.66%
- 1Y
- 75.62%
- 3Y*
- 42.00%
- 5Y*
- 23.53%
- 10Y*
- 17.81%
GXIG vs. URA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
GXIG Global X Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF | 0.52% | 4.43% |
URA Global X Uranium ETF | 25.02% | 19.20% |
Correlation
The correlation between GXIG and URA is 0.18, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 18, 2025 | 0.18 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GXIG vs. URA — Risk / Return Rank
GXIG
URA
GXIG vs. URA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF (GXIG) and Global X Uranium ETF (URA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GXIG | URA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 1.53 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.54 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.47 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.91 | -0.04 | +0.95 |
Drawdowns
GXIG vs. URA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GXIG drawdown since its inception was -3.18%, smaller than the maximum URA drawdown of -93.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GXIG and URA.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GXIG | URA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -3.18% | -93.54% | +90.36% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -28.43% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -37.81% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -37.90% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -61.45% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.27% | -39.38% | +38.11% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.05% | -75.02% | +73.97% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 13.35% | — |
Volatility
GXIG vs. URA - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GXIG | URA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 14.99% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 37.90% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 5.78% | 49.84% | -44.06% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 5.78% | 43.55% | -37.77% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 5.78% | 37.69% | -31.91% |
GXIG vs. URA - Expense Ratio Comparison
GXIG has a 0.14% expense ratio, which is lower than URA's 0.69% expense ratio.
Dividends
GXIG vs. URA - Dividend Comparison
GXIG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.90%, more than URA's 3.90% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GXIG Global X Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF | 5.90% | 3.83% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
URA Global X Uranium ETF | 3.90% | 4.88% | 2.86% | 6.07% | 0.76% | 5.84% | 1.69% | 1.66% | 0.44% | 2.03% | 7.28% | 1.96% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GXIG and URA have a correlation of 0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, GXIG is cheaper at 0.14% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
GXIG is cheaper with a 0.14% expense ratio, compared with 0.69% for URA.
GXIG has the higher dividend yield at 5.90%, compared with 3.90% for URA.
GXIG is categorized as Corporate Bonds, while URA is Commodity Producers Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.14% for GXIG and 0.69% for URA.
Find the right allocation for GXIG and URA
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer