GXIG vs. LQDH
GXIG (Global X Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF) and LQDH (iShares Interest Rate Hedged Corporate Bond ETF) are both Corporate Bonds funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, GXIG returned 4.30% vs 7.53% for LQDH. At a 0.40 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. GXIG charges 0.14%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for LQDH.
Performance
GXIG vs. LQDH - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GXIG achieves a 0.46% return, which is significantly lower than LQDH's 2.45% return.
GXIG
- 1D
- 0.12%
- 1M
- 0.68%
- YTD
- 0.46%
- 6M
- 0.64%
- 1Y
- 4.30%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
LQDH
- 1D
- 0.04%
- 1M
- 0.34%
- YTD
- 2.45%
- 6M
- 2.61%
- 1Y
- 7.53%
- 3Y*
- 7.85%
- 5Y*
- 5.22%
- 10Y*
- 4.67%
GXIG vs. LQDH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
GXIG Global X Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF | 0.46% | 4.61% |
LQDH iShares Interest Rate Hedged Corporate Bond ETF | 2.45% | 4.85% |
Correlation
The correlation between GXIG and LQDH is 0.42, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.42 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 17, 2025 | 0.40 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GXIG vs. LQDH — Risk / Return Rank
GXIG
LQDH
GXIG vs. LQDH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF (GXIG) and iShares Interest Rate Hedged Corporate Bond ETF (LQDH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| GXIG | LQDH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.08 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.25 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.14 | 1.57 | -0.43 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.36 | 3.23 | -1.87 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.30 | 13.73 | -10.43 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
GXIG vs. LQDH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GXIG drawdown since its inception was -3.18%, smaller than the maximum LQDH drawdown of -24.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GXIG and LQDH.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GXIG | LQDH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -3.18% | -24.63% | +21.45% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.18% | -2.34% | -0.84% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -4.86% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -7.08% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -24.63% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.33% | -0.11% | -1.22% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.06% | -1.67% | +0.61% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.31% | 0.55% | +0.76% |
Volatility
GXIG vs. LQDH - Volatility Comparison
Global X Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF (GXIG) has a higher volatility of 1.20% compared to iShares Interest Rate Hedged Corporate Bond ETF (LQDH) at 0.43%. This indicates that GXIG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LQDH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GXIG | LQDH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.20% | 0.43% | +0.77% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 4.13% | 2.02% | +2.11% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 5.75% | 2.68% | +3.07% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 5.72% | 4.41% | +1.31% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 5.72% | 6.43% | -0.71% |
GXIG vs. LQDH - Expense Ratio Comparison
GXIG has a 0.14% expense ratio, which is lower than LQDH's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
GXIG vs. LQDH - Dividend Comparison
GXIG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.90%, which matches LQDH's 5.94% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GXIG Global X Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF | 5.90% | 3.83% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
LQDH iShares Interest Rate Hedged Corporate Bond ETF | 5.94% | 6.06% | 7.57% | 7.69% | 3.73% | 1.65% | 2.22% | 3.09% | 5.08% | 2.37% | 2.33% | 2.98% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GXIG and LQDH have a correlation of 0.42, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GXIG has higher volatility (1.20%) compared to LQDH (0.43%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GXIG dropped -3.18% vs LQDH's -24.63%.
On 1-year performance, LQDH leads with 7.53% vs 4.30% for GXIG. On fees, GXIG is cheaper at 0.14% per year. On volatility, LQDH has been the lower-risk option at 0.43%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, LQDH has performed better with a 7.53% return vs 4.30%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
GXIG is cheaper with a 0.14% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for LQDH.
LQDH has the higher dividend yield at 5.94%, compared with 5.90% for GXIG.
They also come from different issuers: Global X and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.14% for GXIG and 0.25% for LQDH.
LQDH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.83 vs 0.75), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GXIG and LQDH
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer