PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GXIG vs. BSCR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GXIG vs. BSCR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF (GXIG) and Invesco BulletShares 2027 Corporate Bond ETF (BSCR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GXIG achieves a -0.60% return, which is significantly lower than BSCR's 1.63% return.


GXIG

1D
-0.38%
1M
-1.22%
6M
-0.62%
YTD
-0.60%
1Y
3.57%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

BSCR

1D
0.05%
1M
0.30%
6M
1.57%
YTD
1.63%
1Y
4.33%
3Y*
5.31%
5Y*
1.36%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GXIG vs. BSCR - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between GXIG and BSCR is 0.54, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.54

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 17, 2025

0.55

The correlation between GXIG and BSCR has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.54 to 0.55 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GXIG vs. BSCR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GXIG
GXIG Risk / Return Rank: 2323
Overall Rank
GXIG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2222
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GXIG Sortino Ratio Rank: 2020
Sortino Ratio Rank
GXIG Omega Ratio Rank: 2121
Omega Ratio Rank
GXIG Calmar Ratio Rank: 2828
Calmar Ratio Rank
GXIG Martin Ratio Rank: 2626
Martin Ratio Rank

BSCR
BSCR Risk / Return Rank: 9898
Overall Rank
BSCR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BSCR Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
BSCR Omega Ratio Rank: 9898
Omega Ratio Rank
BSCR Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
BSCR Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GXIG vs. BSCR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF (GXIG) and Invesco BulletShares 2027 Corporate Bond ETF (BSCR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


GXIGBSCRDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-3.68

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-7.16

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.12

2.16

-1.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.13

10.40

-9.28

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.70

45.96

-43.26

GXIG vs. BSCR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GXIG Sharpe Ratio is 0.63, which is lower than the BSCR Sharpe Ratio of 4.31. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GXIG and BSCR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

GXIG vs. BSCR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GXIG drawdown since its inception was -3.18%, smaller than the maximum BSCR drawdown of -17.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GXIG and BSCR.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GXIGBSCRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-3.18%

-17.26%

+14.08%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.18%

-0.42%

-2.76%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-2.27%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-14.87%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.37%

0.00%

-2.37%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.08%

-3.30%

+2.22%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.33%

0.09%

+1.24%

Volatility

GXIG vs. BSCR - Volatility Comparison

Global X Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF (GXIG) has a higher volatility of 1.53% compared to Invesco BulletShares 2027 Corporate Bond ETF (BSCR) at 0.20%. This indicates that GXIG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BSCR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GXIGBSCRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.53%

0.20%

+1.33%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.41%

0.60%

+2.81%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.74%

1.01%

+4.73%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.71%

4.07%

+1.64%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.71%

5.32%

+0.39%

GXIG vs. BSCR - Expense Ratio Comparison

GXIG has a 0.14% expense ratio, which is higher than BSCR's 0.10% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

GXIG vs. BSCR - Dividend Comparison

GXIG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.40%, more than BSCR's 4.28% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
BSCR
Invesco BulletShares 2027 Corporate Bond ETF
4.28%4.26%4.27%3.74%2.65%2.12%2.46%3.11%3.35%0.78%
GXIG
Global X Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF
6.40%3.83%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


GXIG and BSCR have a correlation of 0.54, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GXIG has higher volatility (1.53%) compared to BSCR (0.20%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GXIG dropped -3.18% vs BSCR's -17.26%.

On 1-year performance, BSCR leads with 4.33% vs 3.57% for GXIG. On fees, BSCR is cheaper at 0.10% per year. On volatility, BSCR has been the lower-risk option at 0.20%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, BSCR has performed better with a 4.33% return vs 3.57%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

BSCR is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.14% for GXIG.

GXIG has the higher dividend yield at 6.40%, compared with 4.28% for BSCR.

They also come from different issuers: Global X and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.14% for GXIG and 0.10% for BSCR.

BSCR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.31 vs 0.63), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GXIG and BSCR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer