PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GXIG vs. BPH
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GXIG vs. BPH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF (GXIG) and BP p.l.c. ADRhedged ETF (BPH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


GXIG

1D
-0.19%
1M
0.60%
YTD
0.33%
6M
0.02%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

BPH

1D
1.20%
1M
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GXIG vs. BPH - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between GXIG and BPH is -0.77, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 27, 2026

-0.77

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GXIG vs. BPH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF (GXIG) and BP p.l.c. ADRhedged ETF (BPH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

GXIG vs. BPH - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GXIGBPHDifference

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.87

9.48

-8.61

Drawdowns

GXIG vs. BPH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GXIG drawdown since its inception was -3.18%, which is greater than BPH's maximum drawdown of -2.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GXIG and BPH.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GXIGBPHDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-3.18%

-2.35%

-0.83%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.46%

0.00%

-1.46%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.05%

-1.08%

+0.03%

Volatility

GXIG vs. BPH - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GXIGBPHDifference

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.78%

25.75%

-19.97%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.78%

25.75%

-19.97%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.78%

25.75%

-19.97%

GXIG vs. BPH - Expense Ratio Comparison

GXIG has a 0.14% expense ratio, which is lower than BPH's 0.19% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

GXIG vs. BPH - Dividend Comparison

GXIG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.91%, while BPH has not paid dividends to shareholders.


Frequently Asked Questions


GXIG and BPH have a correlation of -0.77, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, GXIG is cheaper at 0.14% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

GXIG is cheaper with a 0.14% expense ratio, compared with 0.19% for BPH.

GXIG has the higher dividend yield at 5.91%, compared with 0.00% for BPH.

GXIG is categorized as Corporate Bonds, while BPH is Oil & Gas. They also come from different issuers: Global X and Precidian. Their fees differ too: 0.14% for GXIG and 0.19% for BPH.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GXIG and BPH

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer