GXC vs. CNQQ

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

GXC (SPDR S&P China ETF) and CNQQ (Rayliant-ChinaAMC Transformative China Tech ETF) are both China Equities funds - GXC tracks the S&P China BMI Index while CNQQ tracks the Solactive ChinaAMC Transformative China Tech. Both are passively managed. Their correlation of 0.85 suggests significant overlap in exposure. GXC charges 0.59%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for CNQQ.

Performance

GXC vs. CNQQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR S&P China ETF (GXC) and Rayliant-ChinaAMC Transformative China Tech ETF (CNQQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GXC achieves a -3.93% return, which is significantly lower than CNQQ's 11.61% return.

GXC

• 1D: -2.27%
• 1M: -2.82%
• YTD: -3.93%
• 6M: -5.13%
• 1Y: 12.26%
• 3Y*: 10.65%
• 5Y*: -4.55%
• 10Y*: 5.25%

CNQQ

• 1D: -0.38%
• 1M: 7.02%
• YTD: 11.61%
• 6M: 12.97%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GXC vs. CNQQ - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
GXC SPDR S&P China ETF	-3.93%	-4.26%
CNQQ Rayliant-ChinaAMC Transformative China Tech ETF	11.61%	-5.96%

Correlation

The correlation between GXC and CNQQ is 0.85, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 29, 2025	0.85

Return for Risk

GXC vs. CNQQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GXC

GXC Risk / Return Rank: 19
GXC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 19
GXC Sortino Ratio Rank: 19
GXC Omega Ratio Rank: 19
GXC Calmar Ratio Rank: 20
GXC Martin Ratio Rank: 18

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GXC vs. CNQQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P China ETF (GXC) and Rayliant-ChinaAMC Transformative China Tech ETF (CNQQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	GXC	CNQQ	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.65	—	—
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.03	—	—
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.13	—	—
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.90	—	—
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	2.02	—	—
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	GXC	CNQQ	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.65	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.16	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.20	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.16	0.30	-0.14

Drawdowns

GXC vs. CNQQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GXC drawdown since its inception was -71.96%, which is greater than CNQQ's maximum drawdown of -17.82%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GXC and CNQQ.

Drawdown Indicators

	GXC	CNQQ	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-71.96%	-17.82%	-54.14%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-13.73%	—	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-25.54%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-53.99%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-60.23%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-32.10%	-1.46%	-30.64%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-28.82%	-9.24%	-19.58%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	6.09%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	GXC	CNQQ	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.64%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	13.59%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	18.88%	24.44%	-5.56%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	28.97%	24.44%	+4.53%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	26.09%	24.44%	+1.65%

GXC vs. CNQQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

GXC has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is lower than CNQQ's 0.75% expense ratio.

Dividends

GXC vs. CNQQ - Dividend Comparison

GXC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.50%, more than CNQQ's 0.23% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
CNQQ Rayliant-ChinaAMC Transformative China Tech ETF	0.23%	0.09%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
GXC SPDR S&P China ETF	2.50%	2.40%	2.81%	3.70%	2.67%	1.35%	1.04%	1.60%	2.03%	1.84%	2.05%	2.85%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both GXC and CNQQ in my portfolio?

GXC and CNQQ have a correlation of 0.85, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, GXC or CNQQ?

On fees, GXC is cheaper at 0.59% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, GXC or CNQQ?

GXC is cheaper with a 0.59% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for CNQQ.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, GXC or CNQQ?

GXC has the higher dividend yield at 2.50%, compared with 0.23% for CNQQ.

What is the main difference between GXC and CNQQ?

GXC tracks S&P China BMI Index, while CNQQ tracks Solactive ChinaAMC Transformative China Tech. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Rayliant. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for GXC and 0.75% for CNQQ.