PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GWX vs. XLU
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GWX vs. XLU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR S&P International Small Cap ETF (GWX) and State Street Utilities Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GWX achieves a 7.41% return, which is significantly lower than XLU's 8.84% return. Over the past 10 years, GWX has underperformed XLU with an annualized return of 8.00%, while XLU has yielded a comparatively higher 9.45% annualized return.


GWX

1D
-0.14%
1M
-6.50%
YTD
7.41%
6M
7.04%
1Y
23.14%
3Y*
16.07%
5Y*
5.08%
10Y*
8.00%

XLU

1D
0.68%
1M
1.79%
YTD
8.84%
6M
8.54%
1Y
17.09%
3Y*
15.18%
5Y*
10.75%
10Y*
9.45%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GWX vs. XLU - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
GWX
SPDR S&P International Small Cap ETF
7.41%35.89%0.21%10.94%-19.98%9.66%13.41%18.18%-18.97%28.88%
XLU
State Street Utilities Select Sector SPDR ETF
8.84%16.03%23.31%-7.18%1.44%17.70%0.51%25.93%3.94%12.05%

Correlation

The correlation between GWX and XLU is 0.27, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.27

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.35

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.35

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.30

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 26, 2007

0.41

The correlation between GWX and XLU shifts across timeframes, from 0.27 (1 year) to 0.41 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

GWX vs. XLU - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
GWX
XLU

Industrials

22.1%

-

Technology

16.3%

-

Basic Materials

14.7%

-

Consumer Cyclical

11.1%

-

Healthcare

8.2%

-

Financial Services

7.6%

-

Real Estate

7.0%

-

Consumer Defensive

4.5%

-

Energy

4.3%

-

Communication Services

2.9%

-

Utilities

1.4%
100.0%

Industrials

GWX
22.1%
XLU

-

Technology

GWX
16.3%
XLU

-

Basic Materials

GWX
14.7%
XLU

-

Consumer Cyclical

GWX
11.1%
XLU

-

Healthcare

GWX
8.2%
XLU

-

Financial Services

GWX
7.6%
XLU

-

Real Estate

GWX
7.0%
XLU

-

Consumer Defensive

GWX
4.5%
XLU

-

Energy

GWX
4.3%
XLU

-

Communication Services

GWX
2.9%
XLU

-

Utilities

GWX
1.4%
XLU
100.0%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GWX vs. XLU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GWX
GWX Risk / Return Rank: 4545
Overall Rank
GWX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4444
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GWX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4343
Sortino Ratio Rank
GWX Omega Ratio Rank: 4444
Omega Ratio Rank
GWX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4444
Calmar Ratio Rank
GWX Martin Ratio Rank: 4848
Martin Ratio Rank

XLU
XLU Risk / Return Rank: 3535
Overall Rank
XLU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3737
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XLU Sortino Ratio Rank: 3434
Sortino Ratio Rank
XLU Omega Ratio Rank: 3434
Omega Ratio Rank
XLU Calmar Ratio Rank: 4343
Calmar Ratio Rank
XLU Martin Ratio Rank: 3030
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GWX vs. XLU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P International Small Cap ETF (GWX) and State Street Utilities Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


GWXXLUDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.23

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.34

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

1.21

+0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.95

1.87

+0.08

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.10

3.96

+3.14

GWX vs. XLU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GWX Sharpe Ratio is 1.40, which is comparable to the XLU Sharpe Ratio of 1.17. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GWX and XLU, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

GWX vs. XLU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GWX drawdown since its inception was -63.25%, which is greater than XLU's maximum drawdown of -51.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GWX and XLU.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GWXXLUDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-63.25%

-51.98%

-11.27%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.91%

-9.18%

-2.73%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.73%

-17.26%

+2.53%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-34.58%

-25.26%

-9.32%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-45.27%

-36.07%

-9.20%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.67%

-2.65%

-4.02%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-14.70%

-10.21%

-4.49%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.27%

4.33%

-1.06%

Volatility

GWX vs. XLU - Volatility Comparison

SPDR S&P International Small Cap ETF (GWX) has a higher volatility of 6.70% compared to State Street Utilities Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLU) at 5.29%. This indicates that GWX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XLU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GWXXLUDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.70%

5.29%

+1.41%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.21%

11.68%

+2.53%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.57%

14.68%

+1.89%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.94%

17.30%

-0.36%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.33%

19.28%

-1.95%

GWX vs. XLU - Expense Ratio Comparison

GWX has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than XLU's 0.08% expense ratio.


Dividends

GWX vs. XLU - Dividend Comparison

GWX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.75%, more than XLU's 2.61% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GWX
SPDR S&P International Small Cap ETF
2.75%2.83%2.71%2.64%2.71%2.75%1.74%3.41%2.94%5.18%4.21%2.67%
XLU
State Street Utilities Select Sector SPDR ETF
2.61%2.71%2.96%3.39%2.92%2.79%3.14%2.95%3.33%3.33%3.41%3.67%

Frequently Asked Questions


GWX and XLU have a correlation of 0.27, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GWX has higher volatility (6.70%) compared to XLU (5.29%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GWX dropped -63.25% vs XLU's -51.98%.

On 10-year performance, XLU leads with 9.45% vs 8.00% for GWX. On fees, XLU is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, XLU has been the lower-risk option at 5.29%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, XLU has performed better with a 9.45% return vs 8.00%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

XLU is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for GWX.

GWX has the higher dividend yield at 2.75%, compared with 2.61% for XLU.

GWX is categorized as Foreign Small & Mid Cap Equities, while XLU is Utilities Equities. GWX tracks S&P Developed Ex-U.S. Under USD2 Billion Index, while XLU tracks Utilities Select Sector Index. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for GWX and 0.08% for XLU.

GWX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.40 vs 1.17), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GWX and XLU

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer