GWX vs. XLU
GWX (SPDR S&P International Small Cap ETF) and XLU (State Street Utilities Select Sector SPDR ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - GWX is a Foreign Small & Mid Cap Equities fund tracking the S&P Developed Ex-U.S. Under USD2 Billion Index, while XLU is a Utilities Equities fund tracking the Utilities Select Sector Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, GWX returned 7.61%/yr vs 9.22%/yr for XLU. At a 0.41 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. GWX charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.08%/yr for XLU.
Performance
GWX vs. XLU - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GWX achieves a 12.82% return, which is significantly higher than XLU's 3.65% return. Over the past 10 years, GWX has underperformed XLU with an annualized return of 7.61%, while XLU has yielded a comparatively higher 9.22% annualized return.
GWX
- 1D
- 0.92%
- 1M
- 0.17%
- YTD
- 12.82%
- 6M
- 15.59%
- 1Y
- 31.16%
- 3Y*
- 17.59%
- 5Y*
- 5.81%
- 10Y*
- 7.61%
XLU
- 1D
- 0.53%
- 1M
- -5.24%
- YTD
- 3.65%
- 6M
- 1.99%
- 1Y
- 11.64%
- 3Y*
- 13.76%
- 5Y*
- 9.36%
- 10Y*
- 9.22%
GWX vs. XLU - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GWX SPDR S&P International Small Cap ETF | 12.82% | 35.89% | 0.21% | 10.94% | -19.98% | 9.66% | 13.41% | 18.18% | -18.97% | 28.88% |
XLU State Street Utilities Select Sector SPDR ETF | 3.65% | 16.03% | 23.31% | -7.18% | 1.44% | 17.70% | 0.51% | 25.93% | 3.94% | 12.05% |
Correlation
The correlation between GWX and XLU is 0.32, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.32 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.36 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.36 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.30 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 27, 2007 | 0.41 |
The correlation between GWX and XLU shifts across timeframes, from 0.30 (10 years) to 0.41 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
GWX vs. XLU - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
GWX
XLU
Industrials
-
Technology
-
Basic Materials
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Healthcare
-
Financial Services
-
Real Estate
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Communication Services
-
Utilities
Industrials
GWX
XLU
-
Technology
GWX
XLU
-
Basic Materials
GWX
XLU
-
Consumer Cyclical
GWX
XLU
-
Healthcare
GWX
XLU
-
Financial Services
GWX
XLU
-
Real Estate
GWX
XLU
-
Consumer Defensive
GWX
XLU
-
Energy
GWX
XLU
-
Communication Services
GWX
XLU
-
Utilities
GWX
XLU
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GWX vs. XLU — Risk / Return Rank
GWX
XLU
GWX vs. XLU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P International Small Cap ETF (GWX) and State Street Utilities Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GWX | XLU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.21 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.61 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.35 | 1.15 | +0.21 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.63 | 1.27 | +1.36 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.19 | 2.84 | +7.35 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GWX | XLU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.02 | 0.81 | +1.21 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.35 | 0.54 | -0.19 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.44 | 0.48 | -0.04 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.23 | 0.40 | -0.17 |
Drawdowns
GWX vs. XLU - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GWX drawdown since its inception was -63.25%, which is greater than XLU's maximum drawdown of -51.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GWX and XLU.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GWX | XLU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -63.25% | -51.98% | -11.27% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.91% | -9.18% | -2.73% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.73% | -17.26% | +2.53% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -34.58% | -25.26% | -9.32% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -45.27% | -36.07% | -9.20% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.96% | -7.30% | +5.34% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -14.73% | -10.22% | -4.51% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.07% | 4.11% | -1.04% |
Volatility
GWX vs. XLU - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for SPDR S&P International Small Cap ETF (GWX) is 5.12%, while State Street Utilities Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLU) has a volatility of 5.47%. This indicates that GWX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XLU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GWX | XLU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.12% | 5.47% | -0.35% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.85% | 11.52% | +1.33% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.54% | 14.57% | +0.97% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.74% | 17.32% | -0.58% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.36% | 19.25% | -1.89% |
GWX vs. XLU - Expense Ratio Comparison
GWX has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than XLU's 0.08% expense ratio.
Dividends
GWX vs. XLU - Dividend Comparison
GWX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.51%, less than XLU's 2.71% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GWX SPDR S&P International Small Cap ETF | 2.51% | 2.83% | 2.71% | 2.64% | 2.71% | 2.75% | 1.74% | 3.41% | 2.94% | 5.18% | 4.21% | 2.67% |
XLU State Street Utilities Select Sector SPDR ETF | 2.71% | 2.71% | 2.96% | 3.39% | 2.92% | 2.79% | 3.14% | 2.95% | 3.33% | 3.33% | 3.41% | 3.67% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GWX and XLU have a correlation of 0.32, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
XLU has higher volatility (5.47%) compared to GWX (5.12%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GWX dropped -63.25% vs XLU's -51.98%.
On 10-year performance, XLU leads with 9.22% vs 7.61% for GWX. On fees, XLU is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, GWX has been the lower-risk option at 5.12%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, XLU has performed better with a 9.22% return vs 7.61%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
XLU is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for GWX.
XLU has the higher dividend yield at 2.71%, compared with 2.51% for GWX.
GWX is categorized as Foreign Small & Mid Cap Equities, while XLU is Utilities Equities. GWX tracks S&P Developed Ex-U.S. Under USD2 Billion Index, while XLU tracks Utilities Select Sector Index. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for GWX and 0.08% for XLU.
GWX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.02 vs 0.81), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GWX and XLU
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer