PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GWX vs. XLE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GWX vs. XLE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR S&P International Small Cap ETF (GWX) and State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GWX achieves a 11.79% return, which is significantly lower than XLE's 32.17% return. Over the past 10 years, GWX has underperformed XLE with an annualized return of 7.57%, while XLE has yielded a comparatively higher 10.22% annualized return.


GWX

1D
-1.21%
1M
0.57%
YTD
11.79%
6M
14.68%
1Y
30.65%
3Y*
17.00%
5Y*
5.61%
10Y*
7.57%

XLE

1D
1.29%
1M
-1.14%
YTD
32.17%
6M
29.80%
1Y
45.00%
3Y*
17.46%
5Y*
20.44%
10Y*
10.22%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GWX vs. XLE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
GWX
SPDR S&P International Small Cap ETF
11.79%35.89%0.21%10.94%-19.98%9.66%13.41%18.18%-18.97%28.88%
XLE
State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF
32.17%7.88%5.56%-0.63%64.32%53.28%-32.67%11.74%-18.22%-0.89%

Correlation

The correlation between GWX and XLE is -0.03, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.03

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.20

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.34

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.45

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 27, 2007

0.58

The correlation between GWX and XLE shifts across timeframes, from -0.03 (1 year) to 0.58 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

GWX vs. XLE - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
GWX
XLE

Industrials

22.0%

-

Technology

15.1%

-

Basic Materials

14.5%

-

Consumer Cyclical

11.2%

-

Healthcare

8.5%

-

Financial Services

7.8%

-

Real Estate

7.2%

-

Consumer Defensive

4.7%

-

Energy

4.7%
100.0%

Communication Services

2.9%

-

Utilities

1.3%

-

Industrials

GWX
22.0%
XLE

-

Technology

GWX
15.1%
XLE

-

Basic Materials

GWX
14.5%
XLE

-

Consumer Cyclical

GWX
11.2%
XLE

-

Healthcare

GWX
8.5%
XLE

-

Financial Services

GWX
7.8%
XLE

-

Real Estate

GWX
7.2%
XLE

-

Consumer Defensive

GWX
4.7%
XLE

-

Energy

GWX
4.7%
XLE
100.0%

Communication Services

GWX
2.9%
XLE

-

Utilities

GWX
1.3%
XLE

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GWX vs. XLE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GWX
GWX Risk / Return Rank: 5656
Overall Rank
GWX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5858
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GWX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
GWX Omega Ratio Rank: 5757
Omega Ratio Rank
GWX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5252
Calmar Ratio Rank
GWX Martin Ratio Rank: 5757
Martin Ratio Rank

XLE
XLE Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
XLE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6565
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XLE Sortino Ratio Rank: 5959
Sortino Ratio Rank
XLE Omega Ratio Rank: 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
XLE Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
XLE Martin Ratio Rank: 6060
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GWX vs. XLE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P International Small Cap ETF (GWX) and State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GWXXLEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.22

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.09

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.35

1.35

0.00

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.58

3.75

-1.17

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.03

10.92

-0.89

GWX vs. XLE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GWX Sharpe Ratio is 1.98, which is comparable to the XLE Sharpe Ratio of 2.21. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GWX and XLE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GWXXLEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.98

2.21

-0.22

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.34

0.79

-0.45

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.44

0.35

+0.09

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.23

0.31

-0.08

Drawdowns

GWX vs. XLE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GWX drawdown since its inception was -63.25%, smaller than the maximum XLE drawdown of -71.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GWX and XLE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GWXXLEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-63.25%

-71.26%

+8.01%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.91%

-12.05%

+0.14%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.73%

-20.14%

+5.41%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-34.58%

-26.04%

-8.54%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-45.27%

-66.81%

+21.54%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.86%

-6.15%

+3.29%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-14.74%

-17.98%

+3.24%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.06%

4.14%

-1.08%

Volatility

GWX vs. XLE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for SPDR S&P International Small Cap ETF (GWX) is 5.21%, while State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLE) has a volatility of 8.25%. This indicates that GWX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XLE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GWXXLEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.21%

8.25%

-3.04%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.82%

16.58%

-3.76%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.52%

20.53%

-5.01%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.74%

26.02%

-9.28%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.36%

29.59%

-12.23%

GWX vs. XLE - Expense Ratio Comparison

GWX has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than XLE's 0.08% expense ratio.


Dividends

GWX vs. XLE - Dividend Comparison

GWX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.54%, which matches XLE's 2.54% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GWX
SPDR S&P International Small Cap ETF
2.54%2.83%2.71%2.64%2.71%2.75%1.74%3.41%2.94%5.18%4.21%2.67%
XLE
State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF
2.54%3.28%3.36%3.55%3.68%4.21%5.62%6.72%3.54%3.03%2.26%3.39%

Frequently Asked Questions


GWX and XLE have a correlation of -0.03, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

XLE has higher volatility (8.25%) compared to GWX (5.21%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GWX dropped -63.25% vs XLE's -71.26%.

On 10-year performance, XLE leads with 10.22% vs 7.57% for GWX. On fees, XLE is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, GWX has been the lower-risk option at 5.21%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, XLE has performed better with a 10.22% return vs 7.57%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

XLE is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for GWX.

GWX and XLE have nearly identical dividend yields, around 2.54%.

GWX is categorized as Foreign Small & Mid Cap Equities, while XLE is Energy Equities. GWX tracks S&P Developed Ex-U.S. Under USD2 Billion Index, while XLE tracks Energy Select Sector Index. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for GWX and 0.08% for XLE.

XLE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.21 vs 1.98), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GWX and XLE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer