PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GWSAX vs. AASCX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GWSAX vs. AASCX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Gabelli Focused Growth and Income Fund (GWSAX) and Thrivent Mid Cap Stock Fund (AASCX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GWSAX achieves a 8.60% return, which is significantly lower than AASCX's 15.09% return. Over the past 10 years, GWSAX has underperformed AASCX with an annualized return of 5.92%, while AASCX has yielded a comparatively higher 10.67% annualized return.


GWSAX

1D
0.55%
1M
0.72%
YTD
8.60%
6M
9.63%
1Y
16.35%
3Y*
11.18%
5Y*
5.34%
10Y*
5.92%

AASCX

1D
0.73%
1M
4.81%
YTD
15.09%
6M
14.56%
1Y
20.50%
3Y*
14.74%
5Y*
6.91%
10Y*
10.67%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GWSAX vs. AASCX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
GWSAX
Gabelli Focused Growth and Income Fund
8.60%2.11%13.19%11.90%-13.71%27.12%8.69%26.78%-25.30%17.07%
AASCX
Thrivent Mid Cap Stock Fund
15.09%4.43%14.60%13.65%-17.85%27.70%21.68%24.51%-10.73%8.73%

Correlation

The correlation between GWSAX and AASCX is 0.59, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.59

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.70

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.79

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.80

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2003

0.86

Over the past year, the correlation between GWSAX and AASCX has dropped to 0.59 - well below their long-term average of 0.86, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GWSAX vs. AASCX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GWSAX
GWSAX Risk / Return Rank: 3838
Overall Rank
GWSAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3939
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GWSAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4040
Sortino Ratio Rank
GWSAX Omega Ratio Rank: 3535
Omega Ratio Rank
GWSAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4949
Calmar Ratio Rank
GWSAX Martin Ratio Rank: 3030
Martin Ratio Rank

AASCX
AASCX Risk / Return Rank: 3333
Overall Rank
AASCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2828
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AASCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2929
Sortino Ratio Rank
AASCX Omega Ratio Rank: 2727
Omega Ratio Rank
AASCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4141
Calmar Ratio Rank
AASCX Martin Ratio Rank: 4141
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GWSAX vs. AASCX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Gabelli Focused Growth and Income Fund (GWSAX) and Thrivent Mid Cap Stock Fund (AASCX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GWSAXAASCXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.28

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.41

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.31

1.27

+0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.65

2.42

+0.23

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.00

8.72

-1.72

GWSAX vs. AASCX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GWSAX Sharpe Ratio is 1.80, which is comparable to the AASCX Sharpe Ratio of 1.52. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GWSAX and AASCX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GWSAXAASCXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.80

1.52

+0.28

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.35

0.33

+0.02

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.30

0.51

-0.22

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.35

0.38

-0.03

Drawdowns

GWSAX vs. AASCX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GWSAX drawdown since its inception was -55.75%, roughly equal to the maximum AASCX drawdown of -56.55%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GWSAX and AASCX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GWSAXAASCXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-55.75%

-56.55%

+0.80%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.54%

-9.01%

+2.47%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.58%

-20.23%

+4.65%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.91%

-32.80%

+13.89%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-50.67%

-40.67%

-10.00%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.42%

0.00%

-0.42%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.26%

-10.68%

+1.42%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.47%

2.49%

-0.02%

Volatility

GWSAX vs. AASCX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Gabelli Focused Growth and Income Fund (GWSAX) is 2.16%, while Thrivent Mid Cap Stock Fund (AASCX) has a volatility of 3.47%. This indicates that GWSAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AASCX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GWSAXAASCXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.16%

3.47%

-1.31%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.38%

10.88%

-4.50%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.65%

14.32%

-4.67%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.38%

20.83%

-5.45%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.96%

20.86%

-0.90%

GWSAX vs. AASCX - Expense Ratio Comparison

GWSAX has a 1.25% expense ratio, which is higher than AASCX's 0.98% expense ratio.


Dividends

GWSAX vs. AASCX - Dividend Comparison

GWSAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.84%, less than AASCX's 13.01% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
AASCX
Thrivent Mid Cap Stock Fund
13.01%14.98%9.22%1.54%3.15%12.54%3.54%2.92%12.94%0.09%0.10%
GWSAX
Gabelli Focused Growth and Income Fund
4.84%5.11%4.39%4.57%5.00%3.90%0.00%0.00%0.09%0.49%1.16%

Frequently Asked Questions


GWSAX and AASCX have a correlation of 0.59, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

AASCX has higher volatility (3.47%) compared to GWSAX (2.16%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GWSAX dropped -55.75% vs AASCX's -56.55%.

GWSAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.80 vs 1.52), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GWSAX and AASCX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer