GWPFX vs. AVUS
GWPFX (American Funds Global Growth Fund Class R-6) and AVUS (Avantis U.S. Equity ETF) are both funds - GWPFX is a Global Equities fund managed by American Funds, while AVUS is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund actively managed by Avantis. Over the past 5 years, GWPFX returned 10.64%/yr vs 13.04%/yr for AVUS. Their correlation of 0.93 suggests significant overlap in exposure. GWPFX charges 0.47%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for AVUS.
Performance
GWPFX vs. AVUS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GWPFX achieves a 11.29% return, which is significantly lower than AVUS's 14.42% return.
GWPFX
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 5.60%
- YTD
- 11.29%
- 6M
- 11.76%
- 1Y
- 28.07%
- 3Y*
- 22.12%
- 5Y*
- 10.64%
- 10Y*
- 13.34%
AVUS
- 1D
- -0.46%
- 1M
- 4.77%
- YTD
- 14.42%
- 6M
- 14.71%
- 1Y
- 32.34%
- 3Y*
- 22.35%
- 5Y*
- 13.04%
- 10Y*
- —
GWPFX vs. AVUS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GWPFX American Funds Global Growth Fund Class R-6 | 11.29% | 20.46% | 20.08% | 28.78% | -26.99% | 18.56% | 25.39% | 10.37% |
AVUS Avantis U.S. Equity ETF | 14.42% | 16.68% | 20.43% | 21.77% | -13.82% | 28.73% | 17.58% | 8.87% |
Correlation
The correlation between GWPFX and AVUS is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.92 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.93 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.94 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 27, 2019 | 0.93 |
The correlation between GWPFX and AVUS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.92 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GWPFX vs. AVUS — Risk / Return Rank
GWPFX
AVUS
GWPFX vs. AVUS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for American Funds Global Growth Fund Class R-6 (GWPFX) and Avantis U.S. Equity ETF (AVUS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GWPFX | AVUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.65 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.87 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.37 | 1.48 | -0.12 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.45 | 4.14 | -1.69 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.80 | 18.85 | -8.05 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GWPFX | AVUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.02 | 2.68 | -0.65 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.59 | 0.76 | -0.17 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.32 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.35 | 0.80 | -0.45 |
Drawdowns
GWPFX vs. AVUS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GWPFX drawdown since its inception was -52.51%, which is greater than AVUS's maximum drawdown of -37.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GWPFX and AVUS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GWPFX | AVUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -52.51% | -37.04% | -15.47% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.78% | -7.85% | -3.93% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.40% | -19.74% | +0.34% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -34.15% | -22.19% | -11.96% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -52.51% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -0.46% | +0.46% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.74% | -5.09% | -0.65% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.66% | 1.72% | +0.94% |
Volatility
GWPFX vs. AVUS - Volatility Comparison
American Funds Global Growth Fund Class R-6 (GWPFX) has a higher volatility of 3.82% compared to Avantis U.S. Equity ETF (AVUS) at 2.98%. This indicates that GWPFX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AVUS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GWPFX | AVUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.82% | 2.98% | +0.84% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.24% | 9.00% | +2.24% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.25% | 12.15% | +2.10% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.23% | 17.29% | +0.94% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 41.64% | 20.85% | +20.79% |
GWPFX vs. AVUS - Expense Ratio Comparison
GWPFX has a 0.47% expense ratio, which is higher than AVUS's 0.15% expense ratio.
Dividends
GWPFX vs. AVUS - Dividend Comparison
GWPFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.17%, more than AVUS's 0.91% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AVUS Avantis U.S. Equity ETF | 0.91% | 1.08% | 1.27% | 1.41% | 1.59% | 1.08% | 1.19% | 0.35% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
GWPFX American Funds Global Growth Fund Class R-6 | 5.17% | 5.75% | 5.81% | 1.60% | 9.84% | 3.39% | 3.41% | 5.77% | 6.18% | 3.35% | 4.30% | 4.75% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.92, GWPFX and AVUS move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
GWPFX has higher volatility (3.82%) compared to AVUS (2.98%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GWPFX dropped -52.51% vs AVUS's -37.04%.
AVUS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.68 vs 2.02), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GWPFX and AVUS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer