PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GWPCX vs. RYGRX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GWPCX vs. RYGRX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in American Funds Growth Portfolio Class C (GWPCX) and Rydex S&P 500 Pure Growth Fund (RYGRX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GWPCX achieves a 7.97% return, which is significantly lower than RYGRX's 18.71% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with GWPCX having a 12.08% annualized return and RYGRX not far behind at 11.85%.


GWPCX

1D
1.02%
1M
-1.68%
6M
5.53%
YTD
7.97%
1Y
17.88%
3Y*
17.56%
5Y*
8.34%
10Y*
12.08%
ALL TIME*
11.42%

RYGRX

1D
0.12%
1M
-6.60%
6M
11.91%
YTD
18.71%
1Y
19.55%
3Y*
18.91%
5Y*
6.14%
10Y*
11.85%
ALL TIME*
9.17%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

GWPCX vs. RYGRX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
GWPCX
American Funds Growth Portfolio Class C
7.97%19.58%19.26%27.77%-27.51%17.70%24.46%26.74%-7.31%24.19%
RYGRX
Rydex S&P 500 Pure Growth Fund
18.71%11.00%25.73%5.80%-28.71%26.61%26.34%34.13%-6.28%23.74%

Correlation

The correlation between GWPCX and RYGRX is 0.87, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.87

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.89

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.90

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.91

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 2013

0.91

The correlation between GWPCX and RYGRX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.87 to 0.91 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GWPCX vs. RYGRX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

GWPCX
GWPCX Risk / Return Rank: 3030
Overall Rank
GWPCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2828
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GWPCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2828
Sortino Ratio Rank
GWPCX Omega Ratio Rank: 2828
Omega Ratio Rank
GWPCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2828
Calmar Ratio Rank
GWPCX Martin Ratio Rank: 3535
Martin Ratio Rank

RYGRX
RYGRX Risk / Return Rank: 2020
Overall Rank
RYGRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1717
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RYGRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1818
Sortino Ratio Rank
RYGRX Omega Ratio Rank: 1818
Omega Ratio Rank
RYGRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2020
Calmar Ratio Rank
RYGRX Martin Ratio Rank: 2727
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

GWPCX vs. RYGRX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for American Funds Growth Portfolio Class C (GWPCX) and Rydex S&P 500 Pure Growth Fund (RYGRX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


GWPCXRYGRXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.33

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.38

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.19

1.14

+0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.36

1.02

+0.34

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.63

4.21

+1.42

GWPCX vs. RYGRX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GWPCX Sharpe Ratio is 1.03, which is higher than the RYGRX Sharpe Ratio of 0.70. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GWPCX and RYGRX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

GWPCX vs. RYGRX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GWPCX drawdown since its inception was -34.59%, smaller than the maximum RYGRX drawdown of -54.22%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GWPCX and RYGRX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GWPCXRYGRXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-34.59%

-54.22%

+19.63%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.88%

-17.01%

+5.13%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.49%

-24.95%

+5.46%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-34.59%

-36.57%

+1.98%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.59%

-36.63%

+2.04%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.93%

-12.54%

+9.61%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.92%

-9.38%

+3.46%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.88%

4.13%

-1.25%

Volatility

GWPCX vs. RYGRX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for American Funds Growth Portfolio Class C (GWPCX) is 4.71%, while Rydex S&P 500 Pure Growth Fund (RYGRX) has a volatility of 10.64%. This indicates that GWPCX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than RYGRX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GWPCXRYGRXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.71%

10.64%

-5.93%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.93%

22.15%

-9.22%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.79%

24.87%

-9.08%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.47%

24.46%

-5.99%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.05%

23.34%

-5.29%

GWPCX vs. RYGRX - Expense Ratio Comparison

GWPCX has a 1.49% expense ratio, which is lower than RYGRX's 2.26% expense ratio.


Dividends

GWPCX vs. RYGRX - Dividend Comparison

GWPCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.22%, more than RYGRX's 4.29% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GWPCX
American Funds Growth Portfolio Class C
5.22%5.63%5.59%0.96%9.93%3.48%3.04%5.54%5.45%2.73%3.67%4.25%
RYGRX
Rydex S&P 500 Pure Growth Fund
4.29%5.09%0.00%0.00%0.00%2.81%4.43%12.10%7.15%6.26%0.05%2.96%

Frequently Asked Questions


GWPCX and RYGRX have a correlation of 0.87, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

RYGRX has higher volatility (10.64%) compared to GWPCX (4.71%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GWPCX dropped -34.59% vs RYGRX's -54.22%.

GWPCX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.03 vs 0.70), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GWPCX and RYGRX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer