GWPAX vs. BLPAX
Compare and contrast key facts about American Funds Growth Portfolio Class A (GWPAX) and American Funds Moderate Growth and Income Portfolio Class A (BLPAX).
GWPAX is managed by American Funds. It was launched on May 18, 2012. BLPAX is managed by American Funds. It was launched on May 18, 2012.
Performance
GWPAX vs. BLPAX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
GWPAX vs. BLPAX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GWPAX American Funds Growth Portfolio Class A | -4.53% | 20.47% | 20.17% | 28.76% | -26.97% | 18.59% | 25.34% | 27.19% | -6.59% | 25.12% |
BLPAX American Funds Moderate Growth and Income Portfolio Class A | -0.70% | 16.64% | 11.30% | 13.87% | -13.60% | 13.87% | 13.16% | 19.53% | -4.59% | 16.71% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GWPAX achieves a -4.53% return, which is significantly lower than BLPAX's -0.70% return. Over the past 10 years, GWPAX has outperformed BLPAX with an annualized return of 12.00%, while BLPAX has yielded a comparatively lower 8.55% annualized return.
GWPAX
- 1D
- 1.17%
- 1M
- -4.03%
- YTD
- -4.53%
- 6M
- -2.52%
- 1Y
- 19.48%
- 3Y*
- 17.76%
- 5Y*
- 7.90%
- 10Y*
- 12.00%
BLPAX
- 1D
- 0.61%
- 1M
- -3.19%
- YTD
- -0.70%
- 6M
- 1.52%
- 1Y
- 14.62%
- 3Y*
- 12.36%
- 5Y*
- 6.75%
- 10Y*
- 8.55%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
GWPAX vs. BLPAX - Expense Ratio Comparison
GWPAX has a 0.73% expense ratio, which is higher than BLPAX's 0.66% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
GWPAX vs. BLPAX — Risk / Return Rank
GWPAX
BLPAX
GWPAX vs. BLPAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for American Funds Growth Portfolio Class A (GWPAX) and American Funds Moderate Growth and Income Portfolio Class A (BLPAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GWPAX | BLPAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.09 | 1.40 | -0.31 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.65 | 2.03 | -0.37 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.23 | 1.29 | -0.05 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.80 | 2.00 | -0.20 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.18 | 8.40 | -1.22 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GWPAX | BLPAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.09 | 1.40 | -0.31 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.44 | 0.65 | -0.22 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.67 | 0.80 | -0.12 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.69 | 0.86 | -0.18 |
Correlation
The correlation between GWPAX and BLPAX is 0.95, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
GWPAX vs. BLPAX - Dividend Comparison
GWPAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.02%, more than BLPAX's 5.87% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GWPAX American Funds Growth Portfolio Class A | 6.02% | 5.75% | 5.83% | 1.61% | 9.94% | 3.42% | 3.42% | 5.77% | 6.19% | 3.39% | 4.36% | 4.84% |
BLPAX American Funds Moderate Growth and Income Portfolio Class A | 5.87% | 5.83% | 3.59% | 2.30% | 6.01% | 4.97% | 2.56% | 3.83% | 4.69% | 3.48% | 3.66% | 3.69% |
Drawdowns
GWPAX vs. BLPAX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GWPAX drawdown since its inception was -34.15%, which is greater than BLPAX's maximum drawdown of -23.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GWPAX and BLPAX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| GWPAX | BLPAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -34.15% | -23.21% | -10.94% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.78% | -7.26% | -4.52% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -34.15% | -20.65% | -13.50% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -34.15% | -23.21% | -10.94% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.74% | -5.00% | -2.74% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.77% | -2.94% | -2.83% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.96% | 1.83% | +1.13% |
Volatility
GWPAX vs. BLPAX - Volatility Comparison
American Funds Growth Portfolio Class A (GWPAX) has a higher volatility of 6.56% compared to American Funds Moderate Growth and Income Portfolio Class A (BLPAX) at 4.00%. This indicates that GWPAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BLPAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| GWPAX | BLPAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.56% | 4.00% | +2.56% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.34% | 6.69% | +4.65% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.91% | 10.74% | +8.17% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.17% | 10.36% | +7.81% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.95% | 10.79% | +7.16% |