PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GWOAX vs. YFSIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GWOAX vs. YFSIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in GMO Global Developed Equity Allocation Fund (GWOAX) and AMG Yacktman Global Fund (YFSIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GWOAX achieves a 17.69% return, which is significantly lower than YFSIX's 25.53% return.


GWOAX

1D
0.00%
1M
2.23%
6M
11.02%
YTD
17.69%
1Y
35.41%
3Y*
18.96%
5Y*
11.65%
10Y*
12.15%
ALL TIME*
8.29%

YFSIX

1D
0.45%
1M
4.74%
6M
16.72%
YTD
25.53%
1Y
22.87%
3Y*
15.34%
5Y*
9.12%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
12.81%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

GWOAX vs. YFSIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
GWOAX
GMO Global Developed Equity Allocation Fund
17.69%28.37%6.14%22.49%-14.10%18.53%10.53%26.56%-12.95%22.60%
YFSIX
AMG Yacktman Global Fund
25.53%14.91%-0.34%16.64%-9.15%13.13%18.46%24.40%2.18%20.95%

Correlation

The correlation between GWOAX and YFSIX is 0.49, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.49

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.64

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.74

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 2, 2017

0.77

Over the past year, the correlation between GWOAX and YFSIX has dropped to 0.49 - well below their long-term average of 0.77, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GWOAX vs. YFSIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

GWOAX
GWOAX Risk / Return Rank: 9494
Overall Rank
GWOAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GWOAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9393
Sortino Ratio Rank
GWOAX Omega Ratio Rank: 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
GWOAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
GWOAX Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank

YFSIX
YFSIX Risk / Return Rank: 2929
Overall Rank
YFSIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2626
Sharpe Ratio Rank
YFSIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2020
Sortino Ratio Rank
YFSIX Omega Ratio Rank: 3939
Omega Ratio Rank
YFSIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3333
Calmar Ratio Rank
YFSIX Martin Ratio Rank: 2929
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

GWOAX vs. YFSIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GMO Global Developed Equity Allocation Fund (GWOAX) and AMG Yacktman Global Fund (YFSIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


GWOAXYFSIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.74

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.54

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.49

1.23

+0.25

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.96

1.54

+2.43

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

15.74

4.46

+11.27

GWOAX vs. YFSIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GWOAX Sharpe Ratio is 2.71, which is higher than the YFSIX Sharpe Ratio of 0.96. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GWOAX and YFSIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

GWOAX vs. YFSIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GWOAX drawdown since its inception was -49.84%, which is greater than YFSIX's maximum drawdown of -35.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GWOAX and YFSIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GWOAXYFSIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-49.84%

-35.10%

-14.74%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.78%

-14.20%

+5.42%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.11%

-14.20%

-1.91%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.21%

-25.14%

-1.07%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.28%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-2.12%

+2.12%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.93%

-4.89%

-4.04%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.21%

4.86%

-2.65%

Volatility

GWOAX vs. YFSIX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for GMO Global Developed Equity Allocation Fund (GWOAX) is 3.20%, while AMG Yacktman Global Fund (YFSIX) has a volatility of 5.38%. This indicates that GWOAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than YFSIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GWOAXYFSIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.20%

5.38%

-2.18%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.20%

15.91%

-5.71%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.88%

22.66%

-9.78%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.22%

15.78%

-0.56%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.39%

16.35%

+0.04%

GWOAX vs. YFSIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

GWOAX has a 0.01% expense ratio, which is lower than YFSIX's 0.95% expense ratio.


Dividends

GWOAX vs. YFSIX - Dividend Comparison

GWOAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.37%, while YFSIX has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GWOAX
GMO Global Developed Equity Allocation Fund
5.37%4.46%0.60%6.10%7.27%12.75%3.85%4.33%3.02%3.05%6.43%12.47%
YFSIX
AMG Yacktman Global Fund
0.00%0.00%8.68%8.02%4.32%8.18%4.76%6.59%0.71%2.63%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


GWOAX and YFSIX have a correlation of 0.49, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

YFSIX has higher volatility (5.38%) compared to GWOAX (3.20%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GWOAX dropped -49.84% vs YFSIX's -35.10%.

GWOAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.71 vs 0.96), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GWOAX and YFSIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer