PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GWOAX vs. VMVFX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GWOAX vs. VMVFX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in GMO Global Developed Equity Allocation Fund (GWOAX) and Vanguard Global Minimum Volatility Fund Investor Shares (VMVFX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GWOAX achieves a 16.38% return, which is significantly higher than VMVFX's 8.43% return. Over the past 10 years, GWOAX has outperformed VMVFX with an annualized return of 12.17%, while VMVFX has yielded a comparatively lower 9.51% annualized return.


GWOAX

1D
0.59%
1M
5.69%
YTD
16.38%
6M
18.34%
1Y
37.95%
3Y*
21.19%
5Y*
10.98%
10Y*
12.17%

VMVFX

1D
0.06%
1M
2.52%
YTD
8.43%
6M
8.94%
1Y
13.14%
3Y*
13.60%
5Y*
10.78%
10Y*
9.51%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GWOAX vs. VMVFX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
GWOAX
GMO Global Developed Equity Allocation Fund
16.38%28.37%6.14%22.49%-14.10%18.53%10.53%26.56%-12.95%25.63%
VMVFX
Vanguard Global Minimum Volatility Fund Investor Shares
8.43%12.74%13.38%7.82%-4.48%23.74%-3.99%23.28%-1.79%15.93%

Correlation

The correlation between GWOAX and VMVFX is 0.64, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.64

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.71

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.75

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.79

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 16, 2013

0.81

The correlation between GWOAX and VMVFX shifts across timeframes, from 0.64 (1 year) to 0.81 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GWOAX vs. VMVFX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GWOAX
GWOAX Risk / Return Rank: 8888
Overall Rank
GWOAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GWOAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8888
Sortino Ratio Rank
GWOAX Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
GWOAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
GWOAX Martin Ratio Rank: 8888
Martin Ratio Rank

VMVFX
VMVFX Risk / Return Rank: 3939
Overall Rank
VMVFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4343
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VMVFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4343
Sortino Ratio Rank
VMVFX Omega Ratio Rank: 4242
Omega Ratio Rank
VMVFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3131
Calmar Ratio Rank
VMVFX Martin Ratio Rank: 3737
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GWOAX vs. VMVFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GMO Global Developed Equity Allocation Fund (GWOAX) and Vanguard Global Minimum Volatility Fund Investor Shares (VMVFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GWOAXVMVFXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.15

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.49

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.56

1.34

+0.21

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.33

2.08

+2.25

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

17.30

8.13

+9.17

GWOAX vs. VMVFX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GWOAX Sharpe Ratio is 3.07, which is higher than the VMVFX Sharpe Ratio of 1.92. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GWOAX and VMVFX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GWOAXVMVFXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.07

1.92

+1.15

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.72

1.01

-0.28

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.74

0.76

-0.02

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.47

0.82

-0.35

Drawdowns

GWOAX vs. VMVFX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GWOAX drawdown since its inception was -49.84%, which is greater than VMVFX's maximum drawdown of -33.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GWOAX and VMVFX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GWOAXVMVFXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-49.84%

-33.09%

-16.75%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.78%

-6.27%

-2.51%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.11%

-7.96%

-8.15%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.21%

-13.02%

-13.19%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.28%

-33.09%

-2.19%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.18%

+0.18%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.00%

-2.83%

-6.17%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.19%

1.60%

+0.59%

Volatility

GWOAX vs. VMVFX - Volatility Comparison

GMO Global Developed Equity Allocation Fund (GWOAX) has a higher volatility of 3.36% compared to Vanguard Global Minimum Volatility Fund Investor Shares (VMVFX) at 1.94%. This indicates that GWOAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VMVFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GWOAXVMVFXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.36%

1.94%

+1.42%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.48%

5.17%

+4.31%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.39%

6.81%

+5.58%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.22%

10.76%

+4.46%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.50%

12.48%

+4.02%

GWOAX vs. VMVFX - Expense Ratio Comparison

GWOAX has a 0.01% expense ratio, which is lower than VMVFX's 0.21% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

GWOAX vs. VMVFX - Dividend Comparison

GWOAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.83%, less than VMVFX's 9.20% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GWOAX
GMO Global Developed Equity Allocation Fund
3.83%4.46%0.60%6.10%7.27%12.75%3.85%4.33%3.02%3.05%6.43%12.47%
VMVFX
Vanguard Global Minimum Volatility Fund Investor Shares
9.20%9.98%3.77%3.05%4.96%12.73%2.02%5.12%7.27%2.30%2.71%3.22%

Frequently Asked Questions


GWOAX and VMVFX have a correlation of 0.64, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GWOAX has higher volatility (3.36%) compared to VMVFX (1.94%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GWOAX dropped -49.84% vs VMVFX's -33.09%.

GWOAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.07 vs 1.92), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GWOAX and VMVFX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer