GWMIX vs. BLUEX

Last updated Jun 26, 2026

GWMIX (AMG GW&K Municipal Bond Fund) and BLUEX (AMG Veritas Global Real Return Fund) are both mutual funds - GWMIX is a Municipal Bonds fund managed by AMG, while BLUEX is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund managed by AMG. Over the past 10 years, GWMIX returned 2.23%/yr vs 9.75%/yr for BLUEX. At a correlation of -0.06, they often move in opposite directions. GWMIX charges 0.39%/yr vs 1.15%/yr for BLUEX.

Performance

GWMIX vs. BLUEX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AMG GW&K Municipal Bond Fund (GWMIX) and AMG Veritas Global Real Return Fund (BLUEX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GWMIX achieves a 1.18% return, which is significantly higher than BLUEX's -6.78% return. Over the past 10 years, GWMIX has underperformed BLUEX with an annualized return of 2.23%, while BLUEX has yielded a comparatively higher 9.75% annualized return.

GWMIX

• 1D: 0.09%
• 1M: 1.04%
• YTD: 1.18%
• 6M: 1.36%
• 1Y: 7.02%
• 3Y*: 3.49%
• 5Y*: 1.71%
• 10Y*: 2.23%

BLUEX

• 1D: 0.59%
• 1M: 0.03%
• YTD: -6.78%
• 6M: -6.85%
• 1Y: -6.42%
• 3Y*: 3.12%
• 5Y*: -0.08%
• 10Y*: 9.75%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GWMIX vs. BLUEX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
GWMIX AMG GW&K Municipal Bond Fund	1.18%	5.52%	0.04%	6.04%	-7.45%	4.19%	4.70%	7.91%	0.87%	4.80%
BLUEX AMG Veritas Global Real Return Fund	-6.78%	4.45%	7.24%	14.35%	-14.30%	3.22%	34.74%	35.34%	-4.91%	27.86%

Correlation

The correlation between GWMIX and BLUEX is 0.39, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.39
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.24
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.19
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.07
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 2010	-0.06

The correlation between GWMIX and BLUEX shifts across timeframes, from -0.06 (all time) to 0.39 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

GWMIX vs. BLUEX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GWMIX

GWMIX Risk / Return Rank: 66
GWMIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 91
GWMIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 87
GWMIX Omega Ratio Rank: 93
GWMIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 32
GWMIX Martin Ratio Rank: 28

BLUEX

BLUEX Risk / Return Rank: 1
BLUEX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1
BLUEX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1
BLUEX Omega Ratio Rank: 1
BLUEX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1
BLUEX Martin Ratio Rank: 1

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GWMIX vs. BLUEX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AMG GW&K Municipal Bond Fund (GWMIX) and AMG Veritas Global Real Return Fund (BLUEX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	GWMIX	BLUEX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.62	-0.64	+3.26
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.65	-0.84	+4.49
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.65	0.91	+0.75
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.82	-0.55	+2.37
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	5.47	-1.26	+6.73

GWMIX vs. BLUEX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GWMIX Sharpe Ratio is 2.62, which is higher than the BLUEX Sharpe Ratio of -0.64. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GWMIX and BLUEX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

GWMIX vs. BLUEX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GWMIX drawdown since its inception was -12.27%, smaller than the maximum BLUEX drawdown of -54.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GWMIX and BLUEX.

Drawdown Indicators

	GWMIX	BLUEX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-12.27%	-54.27%	+42.00%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-3.89%	-12.19%	+8.30%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-5.41%	-12.19%	+6.78%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-12.27%	-21.87%	+9.60%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-12.27%	-29.06%	+16.79%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.43%	-8.72%	+7.29%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.97%	-13.36%	+11.39%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.29%	5.26%	-3.97%

Volatility

GWMIX vs. BLUEX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for AMG GW&K Municipal Bond Fund (GWMIX) is 0.74%, while AMG Veritas Global Real Return Fund (BLUEX) has a volatility of 4.01%. This indicates that GWMIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BLUEX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	GWMIX	BLUEX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.74%	4.01%	-3.27%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	2.24%	8.33%	-6.09%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.70%	10.48%	-7.78%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	4.13%	10.72%	-6.59%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	3.99%	16.57%	-12.58%

GWMIX vs. BLUEX - Expense Ratio Comparison

GWMIX has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is lower than BLUEX's 1.15% expense ratio.

Dividends

GWMIX vs. BLUEX - Dividend Comparison

GWMIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.71%, more than BLUEX's 0.33% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
BLUEX AMG Veritas Global Real Return Fund	0.33%	0.31%	0.29%	0.03%	11.84%	27.20%	25.43%	13.71%	13.40%	0.00%	0.00%	0.24%
GWMIX AMG GW&K Municipal Bond Fund	2.71%	2.86%	2.60%	2.11%	1.89%	5.75%	1.82%	2.19%	1.88%	1.64%	3.38%	3.01%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both GWMIX and BLUEX in my portfolio?

GWMIX and BLUEX have a correlation of 0.39, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, GWMIX or BLUEX?

BLUEX has higher volatility (4.01%) compared to GWMIX (0.74%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GWMIX dropped -12.27% vs BLUEX's -54.27%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

GWMIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.62 vs -0.64), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.