GWMIX vs. YACKX
Compare and contrast key facts about AMG GW&K Municipal Bond Fund (GWMIX) and AMG Yacktman Fund (YACKX).
GWMIX is managed by AMG. It was launched on Jun 29, 2009. YACKX is managed by AMG. It was launched on Jul 6, 1992.
Performance
GWMIX vs. YACKX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
GWMIX vs. YACKX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GWMIX AMG GW&K Municipal Bond Fund | -1.16% | 5.52% | 0.04% | 6.04% | -7.45% | 4.19% | 4.70% | 7.91% | 0.87% | 4.80% |
YACKX AMG Yacktman Fund | 4.19% | 1.34% | 13.15% | 15.46% | -7.50% | 19.66% | 15.25% | 27.49% | 2.79% | 18.25% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GWMIX achieves a -1.16% return, which is significantly lower than YACKX's 4.19% return. Over the past 10 years, GWMIX has underperformed YACKX with an annualized return of 2.21%, while YACKX has yielded a comparatively higher 11.21% annualized return.
GWMIX
- 1D
- 0.18%
- 1M
- -3.72%
- YTD
- -1.16%
- 6M
- 0.97%
- 1Y
- 4.69%
- 3Y*
- 2.47%
- 5Y*
- 1.48%
- 10Y*
- 2.21%
YACKX
- 1D
- -0.42%
- 1M
- -6.86%
- YTD
- 4.19%
- 6M
- -6.42%
- 1Y
- 4.05%
- 3Y*
- 10.37%
- 5Y*
- 7.00%
- 10Y*
- 11.21%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
GWMIX vs. YACKX - Expense Ratio Comparison
GWMIX has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is lower than YACKX's 0.71% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
GWMIX vs. YACKX — Risk / Return Rank
GWMIX
YACKX
GWMIX vs. YACKX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AMG GW&K Municipal Bond Fund (GWMIX) and AMG Yacktman Fund (YACKX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GWMIX | YACKX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.13 | 0.20 | +0.92 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.46 | 0.35 | +1.10 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.31 | 1.09 | +0.22 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.12 | 0.18 | +0.94 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.85 | 0.55 | +3.30 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GWMIX | YACKX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.13 | 0.20 | +0.92 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.36 | 0.41 | -0.05 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.56 | 0.70 | -0.14 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.97 | 0.68 | +0.29 |
Correlation
The correlation between GWMIX and YACKX is -0.09. This indicates that the assets' prices tend to move in opposite directions. Negative correlation can be particularly beneficial for diversification and risk management, as one asset may offset the losses of the other during market fluctuations.
Dividends
GWMIX vs. YACKX - Dividend Comparison
GWMIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.72%, while YACKX has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GWMIX AMG GW&K Municipal Bond Fund | 2.72% | 2.86% | 2.60% | 2.11% | 1.89% | 5.75% | 1.82% | 2.19% | 1.88% | 1.64% | 3.38% | 3.01% |
YACKX AMG Yacktman Fund | 0.00% | 0.00% | 17.32% | 4.39% | 7.35% | 3.72% | 10.82% | 16.84% | 23.06% | 10.67% | 8.57% | 13.66% |
Drawdowns
GWMIX vs. YACKX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GWMIX drawdown since its inception was -12.27%, smaller than the maximum YACKX drawdown of -46.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GWMIX and YACKX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| GWMIX | YACKX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -12.27% | -46.65% | +34.38% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -4.41% | -16.30% | +11.89% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -12.27% | -19.86% | +7.59% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -12.27% | -30.93% | +18.66% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.72% | -10.67% | +6.95% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.97% | -5.28% | +3.31% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.28% | 5.46% | -4.18% |
Volatility
GWMIX vs. YACKX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for AMG GW&K Municipal Bond Fund (GWMIX) is 1.32%, while AMG Yacktman Fund (YACKX) has a volatility of 4.89%. This indicates that GWMIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than YACKX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| GWMIX | YACKX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.32% | 4.89% | -3.57% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 1.85% | 19.24% | -17.39% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.46% | 21.08% | -16.62% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 4.09% | 17.02% | -12.93% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 3.98% | 16.09% | -12.11% |